ϟϟ Your one-stop-shop for every redpill known to Jow Forums ϟϟ
Thread for discussion of the Jewish Question, Race Realism, Anti-Communism, the Aryan Ideal, Traditionalism, Racial Nationalism, and Racial Identity Movements.
1. The Jews are our destruction. They started this war and direct it. They want to destroy the German Reich and our people. This plan must be blocked.
2. There are no distinctions between Jews. Each Jew is a sworn enemy of the German people. If he does not make his hostility plain, it is only from cowardice and slyness, not because he loves us.
>"This movement, Bolshevism, among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States)... this worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire." -Winston Churchill
Why Hitler invaded the USSR ihr.org/jhr/v08/v08p389_Hitler.html. A truly impressive amount of authentic material is now available which confirms that a Soviet Russian attack was intended. We are also sure about when this attack was to take place. In view of this danger, the extent of which we are perhaps only now truly aware, I can only thank the Lord God that He enlightened me in time, and has given me the strength to do what must be done. Millions of German soldiers may thank Him for their lives, and all of Europe for its existence.
I may say this today: If this wave of more than 20,000 tanks, hundreds of divisions, tens of thousands of artillery pieces, along with more than 10,000 airplanes, had not been kept from being set into motion against the Reich, Europe would have been lost.
Hitler said "The people are at the top, the economy is the servant of the people, and capitalists and capital are the servants of the economy, not the other way around. The interest of the state comes before that of the individual. Why nationalize businesses when you can nationalize the people"
He also said politicians should not be involved in any way with business. They should not even own stock he said.
He was neither right nor left. He said the nationalists on the right lack a social consciousness, and that the socialists on the left lack a national consciousness.
Hitler said the error of marxism is: instead of emphasizing struggle and fight, they are pacifists; instead on concentrating on race they are internationalists; instead of individual or personality principle they rely on majority rule like democracy.
From an economic perspective, Hitler did nothing wrong. In his first year of office, he gave 3.374 million people jobs of the 6 million that were unemployed, highest per capita unemployment of Europe at the time. At the same time, most western countries were still stuck in the Great Depression.
They saw charging interest on loans as immoral, forced the banks to abolish usury, saving millions from debt slavery. Hitler was the first in Europe to introduce the 40 hour work week with extra pay for overtime. Workers were subsidized by the government to take vacation abroad. Free healthcare and generous financial support for expectant mothers. Factories were required by Hitler's laws to provide workers with restrooms and a cafeteria. First country to implement government policies to protect the environment and wildlife.
He gave several peace offers from 1933-1940, all of which were ignored.
Adolf Hitler for the first time made his appeal to the common sense of the other powers. On May 17, 1933, a few months after his appointment to the office of Reichskanzler, he delivered a speech in the German Reichstag, from which we extract the following passages:
"Germany will be perfectly ready to disband her entire military establishment and destroy the small amount of arms remaining to her, if the neighboring countries will do the same thing with equal thoroughness. ... Germany is entirely ready to renounce aggressive weapons of every sort if the armed nations, on their part, will destroy their aggressive weapons within a specified period, and if their use is forbidden by an international convention.
... Germany is at all times prepared to renounce offensive weapons if the rest of the world does the same. Germany is prepared to agree to any solemn pact of non-aggression because she does not think of attacking anybody but only of acquiring security."
No answer was received.
Britian also stabbed Germany in the back in WW1 when they got the US involved thanks to the Rothschild's Balfour Declaration all made to destroy Germany. Funnily enough WW2 destroyed the British empire, a war for nothing but Jewry.
When the nationality problem in the former Polish state was growing ever more intolerable in 1939, I attempted to eliminate the unendurable conditions by means of a just agreement. I may also add here that in all of these German proposals, nothing was demanded that had not previously belonged to Germany. In fact, we were willing to give up much that had belonged to Germany before the [First] World War.
You will recall the dramatic events of that period -- the steadily increasing numbers of victims among the ethnic Germans [in Poland]. You, my deputies, are best qualified to compare this loss of life with that of the present war. The military campaign in the East has so far cost the entire German armed forces about 160,000 deaths, whereas during just a few months of peace [in 1939] more than 62,000 ethnic Germans were killed, including some who were horribly tortured. In addition, the other minority population groups [notably the Ukrainians] were subject to a fate that was no less severe.
The former Polish government refused to respond to these proposals in any way. In this regard, the question presents itself: How is it possible that such an unimportant state could dare to simply disregard such proposals and, in addition, carry out further cruelties against the Germans, the people who have given this land its entire culture, and even order the general mobilization of its armed forces?
A look at the documents of the [Polish] Foreign Ministry in Warsaw later provided the surprising explanation. They told of the role of a man [President Roosevelt] who, with diabolical lack of principle, used all of his influence to strengthen Poland's resistance and to prevent any possibility of understanding. These reports were sent by the former Polish ambassador in Washington, Count [Jerzy] Potocki, to his government in Warsaw. These documents clearly and shockingly reveal the extent to which one man and the powers behind him are responsible for the Second World War. Another question arises: Why had this man [Roosevelt] developed such a fanatic hostility against a country that, in its entire history, had never harmed either America or him?
Ever since my peace proposal of July 1940 was rejected, we have clearly realized that this struggle must be fought through to the end. We are not at all surprised that the Anglo-American, Jewish and capitalist world is united together with Bolshevism. In our country we have always found them in the same community. Alone we successfully fought against them here in Germany, and after 14 years of struggle for power we were finally able to annihilate our enemies. ihr.org/jhr/v08/v08p389_Hitler.html
And Hitler fucking DESTROYED England in WW2 - you buttfucking toothless british cunts fucking deserved it
John Parker
I have further never wished that after the first fatal world war a second against England, or even against America, should break out. Centuries will pass away, but out of the ruins of our towns and monuments the hatred against those finally responsible whom we have to thank for everything, international Jewry and its helpers, will grow. en.wikisource.org/wiki/My_Political_Testament
At the founding of this Movement we formed the decision that we would give expression to this idea of ours of the identity of the two conceptions: despite all warnings, on the basis of what we had come to believe, on the basis of the sincerity of our will,we christened it "National Socialist.'
We said to ourselves that to be 'national' means above everything to act with a boundless and all-embracing love for the people and, if necessary, even to die for it. And similarly to be 'social' means so to build up the state and the community of the people that every individual acts in the interest of the community of the people and must be to such an extent convinced of the goodness, of the honorable straightforwardness of this community of the people as to be
>It is not for ideas that we live! >Not for theories! >Not for fantastic party programs! >No! >We live and fight for the German people! >For the preservation of its existence!
Wait, what? Marxists weren't pacifists. They would bash peoples heads in. There are multiple accounts of Marxist violence IN Mein Kampf for crying out loud.
Alexander White
I think he means that in terms of how their utopian would manifest. Their ideal world would breed incompetence and laziness, the National Socialists had youth programs and focused on race and fitness. Their volkish pride inherently created strength while the Marxist rejects nation and race.
I wish I could have this kind of ethnocentrism but I just don't. I've read a lot about the problem, from Edward Dutton and other studies on ethnocentrism among the races. My problem seems to be common among whites. We don't really love our own people, we mostly just dislike the other races. I think this is where the individualism flows from, and the ability to be tricked into thinking other races are the same as us. A notion the other races would laugh at, and one of the reason Jordan Peterson lectures are full of all white boys.
It's a real problem and I'm not sure what to do about it because so many others are like me. Only negative ethnocentric ideas like building the wall catch on. Positive ethnocentrism doesn't seem to catch on.
Jose Brown
>Positive ethnocentrism doesn't seem to catch on. I think it's just we've grown up in a time where there has been no escape from the manipulation going on at least the past 50 years and it's a mistake to attribute that to something inherit in yourself or the race of white people Honestly, what do you expect when at every turn in society it seems like everyone hates you, your culture, your skin, and instead applaud the biggest victims. You internalize that biggest its all you've ever known. Instead imagine a society that holds strength as something to strive for, where it is all about supporting each other and the community. In that society, don't you think positive ethnocentrism would catch on then? Our society has been subverted.
Julian Sullivan
I'm sure subversion is a large element of it, and it's heartwarming to see the National Socialists having escaped it, even for a time. However I can't shake that constant examples even as far back as the founding of America that the same patterns of individualism and negative ethnocentrism towards other races, but not strong positive ethnocentrism, show up in our thinking. When you see how ethnocentric for example Asians are, it blows your mind by comparison.
It seems like these issues long predate Hollywood and the outrageous level of Jewish hypnotism today. I am sure I'll never know to what full extent my thought processes have been altered from my natural state by brainwashing. It took my years to figure out I was trying to get from my girlfriend for example what I needed to get from male friends. Even though I didn't believe in the blank slate theory of leftist equality, I was still behaving in such a way with my girlfriend. The brainwashing is too deep. I worry our generation can never really be fully healed. That we must have children grow up in an environment free of modern liberalism and see what wondrously natural way they behave. I do sincerely hope you are right. I wish it to be true.
Jace Hall
Bump
Charles Ross
>However I can't shake that constant examples even as far back as the founding of America that the same patterns of individualism and negative ethnocentrism towards other races, but not strong positive ethnocentrism, show up in our thinking. When you see how ethnocentric for example Asians are, it blows your mind by comparison. Yeah I see where you're coming from but I think the positive ethnocentrism has been a strong force throughout history, take a look at European colonialism for example, positive ethnocentrism was a big part of that. Sure there's still individualism, but that's not a negative to ethnocentrism, it's still under that ethnocentrism umbrella because everything the individual does for themselves still originates and extends from their own culture, so like it or not every individual plays a role when ethnocentrism is involved.
Daniel Hughes
I think that quote shows the fundamental break between National Socialism as a manifestation of pure immanence and Christianity. In Catholicism, your "most precious possession" is God, not "your own people." Hitler's main error was his admittance of Darwinism. This led to the erosion of his Catholic upbringing, and his appeals to Christian morals and Christ as a perceived predecessor in his struggle against Jewish power were mere rhetoric. Sterilizing the mixed race, as an example, isn't Christian in the slightest. Neither is thinking all things must bend the knee to racial struggle, or that the race question is the answer to all human history. That's just Marxian historical materialism, except class is replaced with race.
"Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community – however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things – whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds." - Pope Pius XI
"No one would think of preventing young Germans establishing a true ethnical community in a noble love of freedom and loyalty to their country. What We object to is the voluntary and systematic antagonism raised between national education and religious duty. That is why we tell the young: Sing your hymns to freedom, but do not forget the freedom of the children of God." - Pope Pius XI
>How do you recognise an glownigger poster? Muh Russia, Never calls niggers niggers, Encourages shooters, Encourages threats of violence against politicians, "Schizo" is his favourite word
