Facebook is auto-generating pages on the site for terrorist organisations Islamic State and al-Qaida, whistleblower claims IS and al-Qaida have been using the platform for networking and recruitment In response to a request for comment, a Facebook spokesperson told the AP: >'Our priority is detecting and removing content posted by people that violates our policy against dangerous individuals and organisations to stay ahead of bad actors. >'Auto-generated pages are not like normal Facebook pages as people can't comment or post on them and we remove any that violate our policies. >'While we cannot catch every one, we remain vigilant in this effort.'
Really now, Mossad and CIA, just give the local Syrian warlord a bag of cash like you normally do, you can't be trying to recruit ISIS from Faceberg to fight Assad.
I'm trying to get my head around it, are they saying some scraps the web for associated content and because there's already a stub, it get auto filled? That's the only thing that makes sense, unless Faceberg is actively trying to recruit ISIS on behalf of Mossad -which was true in the past.
Ian James
>bans anything remotely pro-white >b-but we can't ban terrorist sites because reasons!!!
Fuck Farcebook and its Jewish masters, everyone who has any sort of site on their platform NEEDS to cross-publish to other platforms, before Farcebook crashes and burns.
>Why does Facebook have a legal responsibility to deal with this? Because Farcebook has taken upon itself the authority to control its user's content, this changes it from a "platform" to a "publisher."
And as a "publisher" it is now responsible for ALL content that appears on its pages.
Kevin White
>publisher So Faceberg is now basically a giant Yahoo news back in the day but with people taking pictures of their food and Nan too?
Aaron Torres
Yes. The thing is, back when they had people suing THEM for content, they should have stood strong and won the cases in court (which thery would have), with the defense that those suing were suing the wrong people, they should be suing those that created the content.
When they were told by certain companies, "we won't advertise unless you remove certain content from your site" they should have stood strong and said, "fine." Those companies would have crawled back, as mainstream media is losing viewers while online media is gaining. They could have even set it up so advertisers could choose their own Facebook pages to advertise on, instead of having their ads splashed across every page. This way, advertisers could support pages with content they agreed with. This is how TV used to work, back when it was new. Individual tv shows had sponsors, who would advertise on that show.
But Farcebook is run by Jews, and so the Jewish agenda is THEIR agenda, and they took control of the content of every page.
Now THEY are responsible for ALL the content on EVERY page.
>Now THEY are responsible for ALL the content on EVERY page. And they have taken an active part in genociding whiety, something that I can't imagine we will forget when we get power.
Cameron Roberts
Checked. I always tell everyone to stop using faceberg, twatter, jewtube, jewgle and the other (((big techs))). If more people will start using alternatives we will avoid to estabilish the aforementioned as official monopolies.
Josiah Wright
>bans anything remotely white nationalist because of "hate" >even granny posting cute frog memes >helps spread terrorists pages >"cant" prevent because of muh freedoms WTF
Lincoln Mitchell
Is Facebook bombing buildings?
Jose James
no, but if it doesn't stop terrorism recruitment propaganda it can be accused of enabling it.
8ch*n was shut down because it supposedly did the same with "white terrorism"
Mason Sullivan
But that's different user, cant you see
Dominic Green
There is no difference, only double standards.
Eli Lee
>terrorism recruitment propaganda >enabling Sounds like a slippery slope of bullshit to censor speech. Oh right, that's why people were opposed to the Patriot Act
Carter Lee
I also oppose shutting down 8ch*n because of that, but if it's been done for 8ch*n now I want to see the same treatment applied to everybody.
Hudson Peterson
>>Why does Facebook have a legal responsibility to deal with this?Because Farcebook has taken upon itself the authority to control its user's content, this changes it from a "platform" to a "publisher."And as a "publisher" it is now responsible for ALL content that appears on its pages.
Interesting how liberal activist facebook is fine with the crimes of ISIS and AQ but is quick to shut down any conservative comments supportive of pro life movement, etc.
>NOTE (importint): Even if you do not like Trump, or do not have faith in him (honestly it is a naive thing to think Trump supports Israel, but to each its own), if you want to help destroy support for Israel by turning ALL Trump supporters against it, this is the way to do it.
think of the adl andsplc generating "hate groups" it boosts their budget and justifies their existence even though no one in middle america reaaaally gives a fuck about race shit
