Its a time for thread from the past

No, i am not nesterman. Russian people can just watch nester in english.

Posting some condensed Moldbug:

Progressivism

Progressivism (also called Universalism) is responsible for the vast majority of the world's problems today. It is a non-theistic religion descended in a direct line from the various Dissenter sects of England. Although the belief in God was dropped during the religion's evolution in order to improve its ability to spread, the core of progressive beliefs are very similar to the Quaker beliefs of a few centuries ago. In short, progressives are dangerous and creepy religious maniacs who don't need to believe in God but that makes them no less dangerous, creepy or maniacal.

The conflict between progressivism and conservatism

Progressivism always wins in the long run. Conservatism can at most slow down the implementation of selected progressive ideas. This is because progressives dominate the universities, media and non-governmental organizations which allows them to mold public opinion. Progressives dominate those institutions because progressivism is a far more attractive ideology for people who are intelligent, ambitious and status-seeking. In the US conservatives are largely members of Protestant sects of American origin (mostly Evangelical sects) whereas progressives are the spiritual descendants of the English dissenters, so this conflict is essentially a religious one.

The US government

The Presidency and Congress are mainly ceremonial. The US is governed mainly by the permanent civil service bureaucracy although the real decisions are made at elite universities and then spread by the media and by non-governmental organizations. The universities, media and NGOs are all essential elements of the de facto government, which is referred to as the Polygon or the Cathedral. There is no conspiracy involved - the system is self-organized and self-perpetuating with no need for central leadership.

>?
Castes

In an earlier version, the population of the US was divided into five castes: Brahmin, Optimate, Vaisya, Helot and Dalit. In the new, simplified version we have Eloi, Morlocks and Proles. A caste is a large social group with its own internal rules for ranking social status. The Eloi or Brahmin are the well-educated progressive elites. The Proles or Vaisyas are regular people who work for a living. The Morlocks or Dalits are the underclass supported by crime and/or welfare. The Optimates are the remnants of the old WASP elites and Southern aristocracy, but they no longer are of any importance - in the simplified version they have either joined the Eloi or become Proles. The Helots are unskilled laborers, largely of Mexican origin - they've been split up between the Proles and the Morlocks in the simplified version.

Crime

The criminal underclass is a military auxillary of the progressives. The criminals see themselves as taking what's rightfully theirs and waging war against an unjust society. Progressives enable and support this war by supporting ineffective crime policy.

Removing a democracy

The removal of a democratic government is called a restoration. It cannot be accomplished by forming a political party and winning elections. It can be achieved either by military coup or by making democracy sufficiently unpopular. The latter can be done by convincing sufficiently large numbers of the public that progressivism is a harmful and untruthful ideology.

Replacing a democracy

Democracy should be replaced by a temporary government headed by a Receiver with plenary powers which acts similar to what is done in a corporate bankruptcy - sells off assets and restructures. The future shape of government is left up to the temporary government but in order to prevent progressivism from taking over the new government, all parts of the Cathedral should be dissolved.

The military

Militaries are the only institutions with any importance or power which is not dominated by progressives. Because of this progressives burden the military with rules of engagement which make victory impossible and then use left-wing insurgencies or adventures in foreign countries to defeat the military in proxy wars.

Political parties

In a democracy with two major political parties, the more progressive party is referred to as the Inner Party and the more conservative party is the Outer Party. Supporting the Outer Party in any way is not an effective strategy against progressivism.

International relations

The US essentially runs the world since the aftermath of World War II. Many military conflicts around the world are usually best understood proxy wars in the struggle between progressivism and conservatism. What progressives refer to as independence means total dependence on the US. The current system should be replaced by a return to classical international law with all non-nuclear countries becoming client states of nuclear countries.

Insurgency

There has never been a successful right-wing insurgency in the XX century with the possible exception of Franco. Left-wing insurgencies can succeed as progressive auxillaries in the progressive-conservative in another (more powerful) country.

Activism

Progressive political activism is directed against the elected government and supports the unelected civil service bureaucracy. Anti-American political activism consists of pressuring the US to live up to its own progressive ideals, and therefore is more accurately called ultra-Americanism. Both are effective methods of influencing US government policy in the progressive direction

unqualified-reservations.org/2007/04/formalist-manifesto-originally-posted/
The existence of successful city-states such as Singapore, Hong Kong and Dubai certainly suggests an answer to this question. Whatever we call them, these places are remarkable for their prosperity and their relative absence of politics. In fact, perhaps the only way to make them more stable and secure would be to transform them from effectively family-owned (Singapore and Dubai) or subsidiary (Hong Kong) corporations, to anonymous public ownership, thus eliminating the long-term risk that political violence might develop.

As I can see, NRx ideas got stuck in early 2010's.
Is there anything new happened after 2016?

Wouldn't an underclass of ever-increasing size only serve to solidify globohomo's rule? What interest would serfs have in high-minded experiments in decentralized libertarianism? They'd all vote for more gibs.

Only influence on alt-right as i can tell
youtu.be/MXwokY-nYos?t=1218
sad story of some incel

The bottom line is that no one asks them. Achieving the libertarian ideal through an absolute state, because otherwise we cant. MOldbug says that economically inexpedient people should be put on virtual reality, as it happens now with all this stupid gaming atuff etc

>checked and moldbugbumped

therightdrama.wordpress.com/2015/05/18/hes-still-fucking-going-at-it-day-three-of-the-anissimov-meltdown/
what a clown

As Dubai in particular shows, a government (like any corporation) can deliver excellent customer service without either owning or being owned by its customers. Most of Dubai’s residents are not even citizens. If Sheik Al Maktoum has a cunning plan to seize them all, chain them and make them work in the salt mines, he’s doing it in a very devious way.

I urge you to pay attention to right wing philosophy anons, because that's how degenerate lefties had won in the past.

"look at ancient Europe and how quickly it turned Christian. White people are inherently predisposed to keep expanding their ingroup until it becomes unsustainable and collapses.
Just look at the concept of "whiteness" which is just a collection of ethnic groups in Europe.
The entire colonization of the world was facilitated by a Christian desire to spread the gospel along with the desire for material wealth.
Then the spreading of technology and education was called "white man's burden".

If you can claim that the thousands of years of Jews living in Christian societies impacted their personalities, then you have to also make the claim that whites have been impacted for living in Christian nations for the last thousand of years. Think about it as a form of social darwinism. All the heretics got exterminated, if you questioned Christian dogma you often got killed. Those who wanted to keep their own cultures were killed, why those who were willing to convert survived. This resulted only in the whites who could accept it's teachings. It's no surprise that the modern "Cathedral" is simply a continuation of the Christian dogmas of egalitarianism."

fuck off loser sage and reported stop shilling your jewish spam here

>unqualified-reservations.org/2007/06/why-i-am-not-anti-semite/
i place it right on op post.

Did Moldbug say this?

no its user quote from here
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/143454641/#143478914

Hop along into the oven already kike.

fuck all discurs on internet is dead. here, in russia too. the fucking idiocracy already here. i am so depressed about this. what have we done

home.earthlink.net/~peter.a.taylor/moldbug.htm

read this newfags
unqualified-reservations.org/2013/03/sam-altman-is-not-blithering-idiot/

We're all spiritual-intellectually hungover from the wild bender of 2015-2018

it has been a gradual devolution since the eternal september

try again at a different time of the week

youll find a place on a non Internetwork of the future - it cant be simple to access

my god. checked

>
Facts

>kek is here

Bump

So let’s apply one of these identities to understand AGDP. Forget foreign trade, which we’ll add back in in a sec, and consider an isolated unit like a planet. How do we measure the economic production of the planet? We arbitrarily divide economic actors, with some difficulty but not too much, into “consumers” and “producers”—i.e., peasants and businesses. AGDP is simply the total sales of all businesses to all peasants.

I.e., if all businesses were One Giant Business—you can see the attraction of this approach to the mid-20C central planner, snorting boa-thick lines of pure administrative Bolivian as he plays SimCity with real peasants—AGDP is simply the gross revenues of this monster. And because the amount of water that runs off the ground is the same as the amount of rain that falls from the sky, AGDP is also the number of dollars that consumers spent this year at OGB.

For example: how much more fun of a computer is an iPad than an Apple II? Is it 37.6 times more fun? Or 198.2 times more fun? Or even 547.9? It would seem clear, to anyone not a blithering idiot, that any process which claims to be able to derive any such number is retarded at best and may well constitute felony math abuse.

Not at all! The Bureau of Labor Statistics is, in fact, in possession of exactly this figure. Here’s how they do it. Since Apple was selling computers continuously from Apple II to iPad, we can look at the period when both the Apple II and Apple III were on sale, divide the list price of the Apple III by the Apple II; later, the Mac 512K by the Apple III, and so on until we reach the iPad. This process is called hedonic regression. It is thoroughly official—approved of by both Harvard and the US Government. So who’s the blithering idiot now?

Well, sure! I, for instance, am seriously confused about why everyone in 2013 is still wearing headphones with wires. What’s with Bluetooth A2DP? Doesn’t it work? And definitely, they should speed it up with that Google Glass thing. If that ain’t hedonic I don’t know what is. Especially when it comes to pr0n. Certainly the BLS is falling down on the job if pr0n isn’t part of their GDP deflator. OMG, pr0n—what could be more hedonic than pr0n? Google Glass + pr0n—that’s what. As Glenn Reynolds puts it: faster, please!

fellow whites we are importing shitskins for this