Good thing or bad thing? Progress, or sliding further down the slope of degeneracy?

Good thing or bad thing? Progress, or sliding further down the slope of degeneracy?

I feel like the only women who are going to be taking advantage of this are hambeasts with armpit hair, not 10/10 supermodel babes.

Are you #FreeTheNipple, Jow Forums?

Attached: Topless.png (658x658, 252K)

Surprised Jow Forums doesn't want to talk about tits

>Men are going to start getting arrested for pointing, laughing and vomiting now
Bad thing letting hambeasts unsheathe their hidden weapon

>females as young as 11 years old can now legally walk around cities topless

Attached: 1562542056507.png (367x414, 123K)

No, just wait and watch how they'll bitch that theyre either getting too much attention or not enough, how they're getting "shamed" by "white Christian" families with little children and many more such complaints ad nauseum.

your days are over, kike

Attached: der_coomer.png (518x617, 475K)

This is good though. It'll definitely show you which one you should and shouldn't marry.

guys, the women who show their tits will not be the ones you want to see naked.

Attached: feminism.jpg (460x675, 41K)

I used to think sci-fi stuff like blade runner where women are running around with they titties out in clear plastic coats was ridiculous. Who would do that? And why?
Except now I know the answer is feminists. And we're headed for that dystopia. Fuck.

Attached: 1568994122960.jpg (618x464, 37K)

Such a shame, oh what you don't do for equality.

Didnt the frog discover that wearing bras is actually bad for the tits.
There was also a study suggesting that men merely observing naked breast improves their health.

Imagine letting your 11 year old daughter do this. Liberals accelerate things more than anything.

There's going to be parents parading their little girls around topless like they do with their little boys taking female hormones and dressing like women. God, end this hell.

Attached: 1552537190894.webm (818x840, 2.89M)

Ironically most bare breasted women in the world probably don't even know what feminism is.

Attached: a42f77dafd1682af794f3f4db2076b85.jpg (252x390, 14K)

Might be like when it first became legal for men to be topless. At first it'll just be the ones fighting for it taking advantage of the new law while others think they're weird, lot more women just openly breast feeding and such maybe. Hot and outside so some girls just start going out in bras or no bra more willingly. This generation will think it's some new racy thing to do. Next generation won't even get why it was ever illegal. How fat insecure dudes don't go swimming without a shirt, fat insecure women won't as much either. Sure some will but the same majority of insecure bitches that wear a giant shirt over they're torrid two peace aren't about to go full topless.

WELP. Looks like there is only one thing we can do. RIGHT WING RAPE SQUADS.

Attached: rape.jpg (750x500, 93K)

soon

Attached: John_Martin_-_Sodom_and_Gomorrah.jpg (2863x1830, 1004K)

I remember being 8 and running around topless swimming. I guess older is weird but I don't get why it's weird for kids to be topless unless you sexualize kids. And if you do then you do that regardless of what the kid wears anyway. Not like some pedo is going "I wasn't gonna bother molesting that kid but then I saw a nipple and I couldn't help myself".

I'm more libertarian though. If it doesn't hurt anyone it shouldn't be made against the law.

Its not that I sexualized kids, it that other people do and I don't want to give them anythinf

post tits or shut the fuck up

all the while bringing hispanic's where this is considered rape baiting, they better get ready for that sweat increase in rapes, all the while is just one more of the american civil society cohesion going away and giving place to anarchy

>I'm more libertarian though. If it doesn't hurt anyone it shouldn't be made against the law.

No, laws aren't just there to protect others from other people, it to also protect themselves from their own irrational and impulsive behavior and/or to be able to unite for a common good. This is what lolberts don't undestand and its why libertarian society is inherently degenerate, people will simply follow their own irrational and impulsive desires if allowed that freedom

>I guess older is weird but I don't get why it's weird for kids to be topless unless you sexualize kids.
>unless you sexualize kids.
Gee I wonder what (((tribe))) wants kids to become sexualized for their perversions?

>If it doesn't hurt anyone it shouldn't be made against the law.
That's a dangerous philosophy. Who gets to dictate what is harmful and what isn't?

When will the US collapse finally?

define collapse, for all we know the old US is already gone at the most part, we are seeing the new US coming from its ruins

When the dollar fails.

You have to prove and argue how something hurts someone. You can't prove an exposed nipple hurts anyone.

You're more likely to be molested by your dad than a jew and he's gonna see your nips whether it's legal in public or not. So you're arguing it's gonna benefit pedos. Fully aware you're on #1 pedo site arguing jews seeing a nip gets your kid molested when it's way more likely you should stop molesting your kids.

Same shit was argued when men started exposing their nipples. Lot of wild shit has happened since then but no one attaches those occurrences to a lack of law over nips.

It's a stupidly small legalization. It's just funny watching pol sperg out over a tit on a beach. Stupid funny anyone on Jow Forums acting like they give a fuck about the children. pol really just christcuck newfags from r/donald now or you virtue signal harder than any sjw.

I'm going to assume this is to protect women who are breast-feeding in public from any indecency laws. If it's not, then I just don't know what's happening in this world. Will public gay sex be allowed next? I know that's quite a jump, but I'm just wondering where the line will be drawn.

why are all libertarians pedos?

You're right, let's live like savage jungle apes.

If they allow public gay sex they have to allow straight. But not even straights wanna see straights fuck going by porn stats online so you're safe that that line won't be crossed.

nice if it's hot young white women, gross if it's mokeys or old women

Because they're Jews convincing people that the (((free))) market definitely won't totally monopolize and enslave everyone

Do you always cope with pretending to be shit at reading comprehension for the giggles, cause if so I get it but you could've done better.

But if it's not I'm sorry I'm still writing too many words here for you. I wish they had better English teachers in your land.

tldr: I'm sorry you are slow but also I am still laughing at how slow you are.

Lol y u mad tho?

>Utah
There goes Jow Forums's theory that mormons are based

stop touching kids

>You have to prove and argue how something hurts someone. You can't prove an exposed nipple hurts anyone.

Can you prove me walking outside naked with a boner standing next to a topless 11 year old doesn't hurt anyone? The "if it doesn't hurt anyone, it's ok" philosophy is incredibly retarded.

Equal rights. Men can go topless

Its a Weimar thing, you wouldn't understand.

This article was reported from KUTV (a utah centered news outlet) retard.
Mormon girls can't even show their shoulders or wear anything that doesn't cover the temple garment.
This is likely the work of Californians who've been invading the states listed.

You're the one mad over a nip. Still can't argue outside dead /b/ memes. It's cool I'm killing this thread. I love arguing against pol till the idiots can't come up with any logic back and resort to dated memes. Takes about 2 posts usually.

You should be allowed to do that too desu, the government shouldn't force you to wear clothes.

BRB on my way to Utah to see some tits

Weirdly specific but I can prove it'd hurt you. You never go outside around kids so when you do you stand out starkly. You also got a boner whether kid is topless or not. But kids 11. 11 year old will notice, be freaked out and scream. His big black dad punches you cause violence is greatly justified against pedos in any community. No cop is gonna give a shit. It'll go on worldstar.

But you already know all this. It's why you don't go outside much. It's one of those things that doesn't need to be against the law. You just self police yourself, truly for the betterment of society.

Now watch the kikes import 100,000 somalis to these locations and the rapes will skyrocket.

And yet those same irrational and impulsive people are expected to choose the leaders who will protect them from themselves?

The only appropriate response to this is to take pictures with the flash on. If women want to objectify themselves so be it.

Breed itnoutnof them.

And I suppose that government bureaucrats are magically immune from (((their))) influence?

This. Zion national park is now going to be swarming with outdoor fit girls in tight spanks and nothing on top

Standing naked with a boner can be reasonably seen as a threat, since men can and often do force erect penises on unwilling parties. An exposed tit is not a threat in the same way since women pretty much never shove an unwanted tit inside of another person.

This may come as a shock, but men and women differ both in their anatomy and in their nature.

>he has never had a woman force her bare breasts onto your face without your consent

/thread

We'd all probably think we'd see some perky college girl tits.
But in reality it will be a whole bunch of post-wall purple haired fat fucks with saggy tits.

If I lived there, I'd still report them for public indecency.

faggot

Attached: 6ee.jpg (491x491, 42K)

That aint good

Yep, *I'm* the Jew faggot, not the guy who wants to shove his boner in the face of kids.

That's the problem with you women, you think because it doesn't hurt a direct individual that it's a victim-less crime.
Men are thinking big picture, if it's society and thus indirectly hurts the individual.

Although, most men nowadays would probably agree with you, but not because they don't see a problem with it, but because they see how they can accelerate and exploit it.

>Also, show tits or GTFO

>you're the one mad at a nip
I like the japs theyre pretty chill. You on the other hand are a child molesting rabbi faggot getting bent because people are calling your hobby sick and perverse.

So why weren't men worried about it when it no longer became against the law for men to expose nipples.

Oh wait some weirdly were. And yet nothing came of it. We now call those men retarded. Cause a nipple never murdered anyone and they were sissy dudes scared of a nip.

mfw thot patrolling the whores of babylon

Attached: mormon.jpg (1242x630, 65K)

Men can do whatever the fuck we want.
Also, men's nipples aren't naturally sexually, where women's tits are.

Again though, you're a woman, you are intellectually inferior and probably didn't read the part where men are going to abuse your logic and use it against you.

Not a jew but laughing at how they got you. My only hobby is laughing at you fags on pol try to argue a nipple hurts you more than your uncle molesting you and turning you into a closet pedophile now.

Which is better than an open one but also why you feel weird and everyone in this thread keeps bringing up hypothetical 11 year olds while all the normies away from here are just thinking "sweet I might see some tits on the beach next year".

>Good thing
yes
now you can walk your slave bitch with just a thong and gag-leash in public places
imagine the roasties' butthurt

Attached: 1556622009879.webm (720x1280, 665K)

>What we have is, failure..to communicate.
>This is how [she] wants it, so [she] gets it.
>I don't like it anymore than you men.

Men also feel some stimulation from nipples being touched so they're actually more sexual than woman's nipples. Mens nipples only exist to be stimulated while at least a woman's can produce food for a baby. If it seems mens nipples aren't sexualized it's only because women control themselves, women do actually enjoy touching and staring at a nice man chest.

And lol still ain't feeling that superior logical man brain. Must be too smooth. You didn't use any of my logical points at all or even point them out as wrong. It's ok though because I really don't expect you to be smart on pol.

Dilate

Attached: 1546127543582.jpg (1024x683, 366K)

Hah another dated coping meme when you can't argue back. So easy.

What if theres children?? PEDOS

Good thing.

You'll be able to more easily identify degenerate whores.

That's only true for faggots though, and we don't want to base societies rules around faggots.

Also, why did you change your ID, shilling I assume, but you must realize, you have no power here.

>t.seething incel

>Yikes

Attached: 294.png (843x903, 39K)

Woman, no matter what they look like, should be able to do as they please. Ironic though some of the windiest states are listed. Titties flop in the breeze as well as when jogging on Baywatch.

I don't see what the big fucking deal is anyway, a tit is a fucking tit.

Until men can understand that fully though, women popping tits out should expect to be ogled, photographed, and approached.

and very little will actually change
some lefty protest here or there will have some topless women but that's about it

public degeneracy to corrupt the children.
kys op

>that webm

Attached: 1368510790658.jpg (805x601, 92K)

What's only true for faggots? Nipples being sensitive? Or that women like mens chests?

Cause I feel like the easy joke is to make fun of how no woman probably touches/looks at you. But then I worry that's what you want. Like you get off to me demeaning you and pointing out you're lack of logic. Thus all the more lil cope meme replies.

Also didn't modify a thing. I'm shitting on y'all from a smart refrigerator.

Attached: libertarians lel.jpg (567x527, 58K)

Means more hoes going topless on instagram. I’m okay with it. Doesn’t matter how much they try to de-sexualize the nipple. I can’t get enough. Been with my wife over a decade now and still watch her changing her bra or in the shower and can’t get enough of her tits.

Finally, a way for Jow Forums to see female tits outside the internet!

Hell, I even find myself trying to catch a quick glimpse right before she shoves it in the babies face.

>Been with my wife over a decade now
Lucky you, I've been with my wife for 6 years, and now her tits are scarred with stretch marks (not from getting pregnant, from getting fat). At least they're still perky, but they won't be after 30.

She’s in her mid thirties, three kids later, still pointing up and nearly perfect size. I could go with the areoles being 10% smaller, but meh. I think the key is that she was small chested when we first started dating, but they grew with each pregnancy.

''>No, laws aren't just there to protect others from other people, it to also protect themselves from their own irrational and impulsive behavior and/or to be able to unite for a common good. This is what lolberts don't undestand and its why libertarian society is inherently degenerate, people will simply follow their own irrational and impulsive desires if allowed that freedom''

Because fuck personal responsibility am I right!

''>You're right, let's live like savage jungle apes.'' Those savage jungle ''apes'' actually live in a highly militaristic and masculine society were women not only have no power over other adults but are also considered inferior. I think the alt-right should give their life style a chance.

most "people" indeed hate individual responsibility
that's one of the reasons why they're disgusting
truly, they shouldn't be treated as Humans, since they don't want to behave as Humans...

Just because you disagree with the choices people make doesn't mean people don't value their individual responsibility.

it's not the disagreeing part that bothers me
it's the buggering others part

Incoming 100000% increae in sexual harassment/rape cases

Is it the nipple thing?

no need for laws to protect "people" from themselves
I'm very fine with letting them be as degenerate as they want
as long as I can openly discriminate against them for it
let toasties expose themselves as sluts, and let the actual people patrol them for it
there's no moar efficient way, anyway

Attached: 1567476370569.gif (264x480, 2.47M)

It will be the fat hamplanet feministd who do it, and they will turn around and cry sexual harassment if a white man looks.

What do you consider "patrol"?

Cause you can call em a slut on facebook all you want. You just can't assault them.

You're also basically saying that while the state can't infringe on individual choices, which makes sense, you want the ability to do so. You don't though. Mainly cause you're very powerless.

That's pretty hot.
I bet we're going to see some interesting fashion trends.

I like breasts, gentlemen.
I am an ass-man by nature, but I'll never turn down some tiddy.

if I'm throwing a muhtits tenant out, or fire a muhtits employee, or refuse service to a muhtits client, you can be sure I'll get sued for discrimination, here
shit, even insulting a woman is illegal, here (not shitting you: if you call a slut a slut, it's considered as discrimination, now)
that's the problem
I'm all for sluts flashing their tits being legal, and all social consequences thereof being legal too
bretty simple, and very efficient

Why does it feel like the female dream is to be able to act like the biggest whores possible while being immune from any criticism or responsibility?