Surprisingly enough, WaPo asked if it was selfish to for a woman to have kids at 47. Old leftist hags and manginas threw a fit.
Old roasties mad at Washington Post
Other urls found in this thread:
Women only have ~12% of their eggs left by age 30.
It's fine if the kids healthy.
literally the last, deformed, retarded egg she had left.
Think about it, she had a son at 47, if her son decides to have kids at age 30, she'll be 77 by then (if alive). So she is likely denying her grandchildren the opportunity of having a grandmother. Our actions impact other people as well.
Chances are she won't stay alive into the kids mid 20's.
How is this anyone's business but hers? Who fucking cares?
maybe in shithole brazil where the average life expectancy is 48
This is a redpill
Downs kids are kinda cute. If that's what you're into. I guess.
this is retarded, the ovaries have MILLIONS of eggs, they never run out. the issue is hormonal changes.
50% of all eggs are depleted before puberty
So she is likely denying her grandchildren the opportunity of having a grandmother.
so what? for millenias most people didnt know their grandparents
society fucks over men
nature fucks over women
My grandma was 50 when I was born
It's everyone's business since we are forced to pay welfare
you can't have it both ways
I can't read the article because I will not turn off my adblock, but is she on welfare? Also, do you pay welfare to the US?
a nerve I touched
it's true. When a girl is born, she's already losing eggs.
I know grand parents around this age raising their grand children because of the opioid epidemic and crack epidemic...having the grand kids around have been both stressful and meaningful
I will take you at your word