After phasing out all nuclear power plants

>They already buy tons of electricity abroad

We are a large electricity exporter now.

Attached: C0EE5B41-629F-4581-B826-2AC37D8DFEDC.jpg (1200x873, 194K)

So germany is getting 100% depending on Russia for energy and heat? damn

Natural gas by itself is sufficient. Fuck coal

bad choice i will combat that will force.

coal must stay!

P.S. we produce electricity pretty cheaply, but got lots of taxes on it.

Attached: 81C77DC1-0E6E-4071-86EF-74927601AC35.png (1200x848, 529K)

>Getting rid of nuclear is good

Attached: 1528939185091.gif (1200x850, 64K)

This makes Mrs OPEC happy

Attached: gretatemplate.png (881x1488, 259K)

Uh, are you just getting out of a coma from the year 1967?

Attached: download.jpg (900x577, 91K)

>shut down nuclear
>shut down coal
Germany won't have electricity in the coming decades
to be fair, Germany also won't have any white people in the coming decades thanks to jewish communists like Merkel.

Leftists confuse nuclear energy with nuclear weapons and drank the dank meme-ade that is solar and wind despite neither of those EVER going to work for baseline load.
Rightists continue to be in the literal pockets of oil, coal, and natural gas.
It works for both groups to give massive welfare subsidies to solar and wind.

The only clean energy sources that can deal with baseline load are geo and hydro but you need sufficiently small populations and be blessed with geography and geology (like Iceland).
But really what Germany is doing is just outsourcing clean energy production to nuclear reactors in France. Its inefficient and silly, but its a way to both admit that nuclear works without having it within your borders.

>Such a fucking coincidence, just in time for Nord Stream 2.
Those fucking idiot students didn't have shit to do with this.

Attached: 31123857237.jpg (225x225, 8K)

Yup, just like how China is leading the charge on clean energy by creating CFCs and then destroying them to bank the credits and pump their own numbers

>wind
>solar
Bad geography/weather for that in Germany. Unless the conditions are optimal you'll increase your carbon footprint on top of having expensive energy.
>hydro
Limited by geography. If you had more good spots for them you would have used them by now.
>geothermal
Probably also very limited, but who knows.
>trash
>biomass
Hard to imagine this could be efficient at a large scale. At a small scale it might make sense when the material is easily available.
>natural gas
Seems to be Europe's only option overall. The whole world seems to be preparing for a natural gas future (despite the noise of the environmentalists).
In any case, Europe will have energy shortages once the US stops guaranteeing cheap oil for everyone. Your energy will get more expensive and your industries will take a hit. And your leaders know that. So they want to make you believe that this was your idea all along and that this is self-imposed to save the Earth. But it's not. It doesn't make a damn difference. You just don't have enough energy and you have to accept it.

wont work all year around
coal,oil and gas can be deposited and used 247

meanwhile as much as you cut down, china, india, indonesia, south america and africa will just offset that so that it doesnt matter

Your own graph says 2019 is predicted to be the year that changes. As you go green, you import more and more.

No it won't. Geothermal is also out, it's not practical.

I guess europoors have to be really protective of their nuclear fucking nightmare because their stupid female-led jew-run police states rely on the cheap energy this dangerous practice provides.

fucking cheerleaders for the new world order, haha

Attached: JAPAN-FUKUSHIMA.jpg (1256x942, 530K)

>Will this be sufficient?
Well, it depends on how good you are at sucking Uncle Vladimir's gas-pipe.

Attached: 06_Soldaten_Berlin_copy.jpg (1200x829, 155K)

Are you not realising that the cleanest form of energy comes from nuclear? Watch the video.

>all we need is natural gas we're all good

Attached: boomer nap.jpg (500x500, 35K)

Your pipe dream of energy production with zero pollution cannot happen without at least some nuclear power.
>But muh Chernobyl
The Soviets were retarded so the whole world has to be punished? Sounds like par for the course with you leftyfags.

But germany has coal. Natural gas has to be imported from Russia.

>coons want revenge for King Leopold, but they're all too dumb to look at a map and figure out which country belgium is so they just run to the one with the most gibs and beer by volume right on time for it to lose electricity

>Germany now aims to phase out all coal power plants by 2038. We don’t have any oil fired power plants.
>That only leaves wind, solar, biomass, geothermal, trash, hydro and natural gas. Will this be sufficient?
no prob, most hydro is only 20% cap due to not wanting more dams.

plus, you Nazis could make as many "oil fired" plants as you need in short order.

"oil fired" is diesel or jet engine connected to generator. Those are good for peak demand.

You use wind and solar excess to pump water back up stream for Hydro-banked power for when solar and wind stop.

Just deport Muslim and kill all the Jews (including first Merkel) and Germany will have an excess, most due to Germans autistically buy the latest most energy stingy advanced consumer products, like those all in one washer/dryer combos that dehydrate clothes without heat.

Biomass is pretty large here. Wind is ok too, especially in the North.

It is really simple. Whenever you shut down a nuclear power plant you are guaranteeing starting up more oil, coal, or natural gas plants. Every damn time

Nope, what happened is that we had exceptionally low wind months in May and June.

Attached: 59A69E4C-EC78-4F28-91FA-C3F6DC35D1F6.png (1184x822, 21K)

>Will this be sufficient?
According to the Eternal Growth System, it's not.

Shut up you stupid god damn smelly french weeb pedophile.

But burning liberals is forbidden by law sadly.

Cleanest? nigger what is 100,000 years of pollution. What is the current no-go zone in Belarus and Japan? Are you kidding?

Build more coal, build hydro, build anything... nuclear is literally insane if you ask me.

I don't care about no pollution, I care about the bloodline-altering, territory-erasing pollution that nuclear energy can cause.

>exceptionally low wind months in May and June.
what i said here which you didnt even bother to address...

who needs nuclear energy, lol?

Attached: 20190801160417.grafico.jpg (530x397, 63K)

>nuclear is literally insane if you ask me.

Attached: 1567307749948.png (352x425, 7K)

Really. The EU environmental regulations or environmentalist activists dont have a problem with biomass?

I'd rather side with reddit than the jews on this one. Who benefits most from cheap energy other than fucking niggers? Have you ever thought about this? No, you just want cheap energy for your pornbox. Circumslave, go cheerlead for more nuclear power plants to serve your mulatto society, and mock those who want to limit the risk of radiation fallout on tiny Europe.

cheab enegee :-DD-:D:DD;DDDD

Germany won’t ban coal. It’ll just buy more “carbon credits” from itself and virtue-signal it’s way into the next century and the most ecologically friendly (on paper) Muslim country on earth.

8.3 geothermal, wtf?

Why are you Arabs so obsessed with fucking European whores?

No, biomass is organic, so we love it.

>shut down efficient western coal plant
>now we can import energy from khazakstan where they use a coal plant which produce ten times as much co2
>but atleast it's not in our country so we don't need to give a shit
>what are you doing for the climate goy?
I will never forgive leftists for what they did to the climate discussion

They start to have now. Because this fucking biomass industry kills nature on large scale.

Strictly speakin* so are fossil fuels.

user, you are in for a surprise.

Hahahahahaha
>Germany

Attached: 1569002758058.jpg (481x329, 82K)

after they let the muslims kill half of you and then 'unify' the remainder under their leadership to push the muslims back out, yes that will be sufficient.

Nobody imports electricity from Khazahstan, don’t be silly. We import fish and Volksdeutsche from there, NOT power.

Attached: 75B3E09B-CE32-4943-8948-6A55C5421E5C.jpg (819x1023, 179K)

They're right you know

Attached: 1567867640728.jpg (415x600, 58K)

Germany closed coal mines, but left electric plants fueled by coal. Only now they will import coal from abroad. This is a gigantic hoax.

You'll get your energy.
It'll just be really expensive.
The bourgeoisie really do hate the working class.

you cant scrub CO2 from coal emissions lmao

>fade out all self reliance
>completely dependent on mercy of others
>give tons of money to other polluting countries
>we save der planet
Fuck Hans I wish to god Churchill was allowed to finish genociding you, thanks to Merkel my prayers are slowly being answered

No user, harnessing energy isn't a jewish plot.

Attached: 1477756717569.gif (360x240, 1.83M)

Coal was already imported to a certain degree from China for years.

Anyway, glad it's going downwards now. The faster this "society" breaks down, the sooner we will have a race war that will make Weimar's chaotic political situation look like Kindergarten.

Your love will be over soon and turns into hate.
forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/03/07/with-ethanol-and-biomass-no-longer-viewed-as-green-will-other-renewables-soon-follow/

Oh I have my criticism of entrenched centralized power systems but you are quite obviously a fucking uneducated mong f your current ratio Al is anything to go by. Of course you'll trot out da jooz! I wouldn't expect anything less than that from a person like you.

>nuclear bad
>coal good

Get ready for managed brown-outs, German anons

>f your current ratio Al
*if your current rationale

Attached: 1549763080871.png (648x770, 391K)

we are near to a tectonic plate boundary

lithium batteries are now cheap enough for renewables to compete with gas peakers.

putin will build nordsream 3 for your gas plants

>yes goy 20% of what you pay is a "renewables surcharge", surely you have to problems with that. You wouldn't want to be a bigot, right, yiu fucking nazi piec of shit?

get ready for regular power outages like in Venezuela

Attached: ▄█▀ █▬█ █ █ █ █▀█▀..png (642x687, 326K)

only retards care about that.

No one has died from Fukushima, oh wow how dangerous. The only reason people can retrun after only 6 years is because the rules on nuclear energy/radiation are so strict its retarded.

who owns the banks other than jews? guatemalans?

yes, I think nuclear energy poses a larger threat to society than other forms of power generation. I have a BSc. Cry about it, most people agree with me, look it up.

Attached: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Forked River, Lacey Township, Ocean County, New Jersey (201 (2352x1764, 310K)

Which is no surprise since we live in times where people are afraid of radio waves.

okay, go ahead and live near Fukushima and expose your bloodline to that. Doesn't concern me.

And people never account for inefficiency of energy transmission.

because you cant store renewable and source it as needed
well, not unless you use the goblins at least

You Germans are weird.
First you build more coal power to replace the more environmental friendly nuclear and then pretend you're great friends of the environment by shutting down those coal power generators you just built.

Wrong. Our politicians are in alliance with farmers and large land owners who provide the biomass for burning. This is a very lucrative business and there is no way the militant vegans can change our love for biomass.

Attached: 5897F73B-27A5-4ABF-86A2-CF408D0E92FC.png (1920x2955, 213K)

>I have a BSc.
In gender studies?

I have a MSc. in material science. The new Thorium reactors would be a great source of clean energy whilst producing a lot less waste.

You forgot that Germans still think that burning biomass (=nature) is nature friendly.

Greta will be released on you.

The renewable surcharge pays for past subsidies, not current ones. It’s a total clusterfuck, we paid for solar and wind with taxes when they weren’t competitive price wise.

Burning biomass is nature friendly. It regrows, total net emissions are 0.

>Eternal Growth System
Is that what they are calling a system that doesnt feature artificially enforced shortages mandated by the corrupt and decadent elite?

Attached: 1568853005406.gif (416x498, 666K)

>Nuclear is bad and racist, don't you know about Fukushima?

Attached: 1566473493235.png (827x953, 279K)

They are a great source of energy. Put them in the middle of nowhere, not metropolitan Europe. Sorry your countries are too tiny to support what I would deem an adequate safe distance for this type of plant. To me, living in France seems hilarious... One accident and your bloodline is forever doomed. You don't just die, your kids get mutated, and their kids, etc.

>inb4 nuclear accidents are a myth and your enzymes and DNA run on cesium

remember to pray for luxembourg

Attached: Luxembourg area nuclear sites map.jpg (840x594, 80K)

>The Soviets were retarded so the whole world has to be punished?
YES

from Jow Forums
>I finally made a twitter account yesterday and decided to check out the denizens of the #cancelstallman hashtag

>They were all celebrating how Stallmans ousting would help more women into software. They said his suffering was justified as it would help usher in an age of diversity in computing.

>It's kinda like human sacrifice in their minds. I once heard someone say that intellectual support for communism declined as violence in communist govenrments declined. Sort of a notion that the violence was evidence that a new world was being created.

>I think that's the mentality that these people have, that violence and suffering is evidence to them that they are creating their utopian diverse world and so they seek to deal out as much as possible. Sort of a demonic type of outlook

Wow you're so fucking stupid, you think flying over Fukushima exposes you to enough radiation to cause harmfull exposure? You do know that radiation decreases with square law of distance you fuckwit? Or are you afraid of particles in the air km's above ground? You do know Uranium is one of the heaviest elements and falls down to the ground pretty fast. From which diploma mill did you get your Bsc. The exposure to solar radiation you get from flying that high is way higher and even that is negligable. Does nuclear has risks? Yes, but nowhere near the scare mongering put up in the media. It took a fucking 9.0 magnitude Earthquake and a Tsunami to causea fracture in a reactor, and noone died, tell me how dangerous it is.

This

>living near
>flying over

9 words in and I'm done reading your reply. nice strawman tho

Just buy more from us okay?

Attached: download (7).jpg (275x183, 9K)

They want to claim their prearranged climate measures were a response to public sentiment. The protest was funded by the same wealthy elite funding the collapse of the West.

Energy density is a thing Fritz. Efficiency (η) is another. These two factors are the silver bullet that kills the mythical unicorn of renewables.

t. BSEET