Name a sexier aircraft

name a sexier aircraft

ill wait

Attached: b2sprit.jpg (956x509, 60K)

>Not an SR-71
/thread

Attached: lockheed-martin-sr-71-blackbird-1.0.jpg (1600x900, 166K)

This

Attached: 1519342013418.jpg (5953x3747, 2.13M)

Attached: RAF Harrier 20 SQN.jpg (1115x1585, 128K)

kill yourself

Attached: 1518297793942.jpg (787x968, 165K)

no u

Attached: Blackbird1.png (1920x1080, 2.03M)

Attached: RA-5C_Vigilante_overhead_aerial_view.jpg (2344x2916, 2.46M)

You guys all try way too hard. This can be yours for $600/mo

Attached: image.jpg (630x946, 245K)

Attached: image.jpg (400x234, 62K)

how do these planes hold up to the intense heat expansion/compression cycle?

By being made mostly of titanium, and also making everything a bit too small so when it's up in the air and warmed up everything fits together right
Side effect: it leaks a shit ton of fuel on the ground

> Retired 1998 (USAF), 1999 (NASA)
What went wrong?

satellites

Satellites. It's also kind of sad that the U-2 outlasted its intended replacement

Spy sats and the demise of the only country which could knock them down as fast as the US could put them up.

>name a sexier aircraft
Why stop at simply being sexier than an ugly flying triangle? Basically anything is sexier than it. I will rather name the sexiest aircraft ever produced: it's Su-27.

Attached: su-27sm3 (6).jpg (1200x813, 134K)

>no one has posted the F-4
Losers

Attached: IMG_2793.png (999x666, 1.13M)

done

Attached: thumb-350-345486.jpg (350x219, 10K)

Attached: do it for F-4.png (1920x1200, 1.2M)

>slavshit
>good looking
ahahahahaha

Attached: brainlet4.jpg (588x823, 109K)

Done

Attached: C.202.jpg (720x523, 55K)

it was shit

>commu-garbage

Attached: amCYYaP.png (610x457, 448K)

I like it how your picture mathes your appearance, which is apparent from the content of your post.

Attached: su-27sm (6).jpg (1300x880, 100K)

srsly?

>actually liking the look of these bulky flying coffins
LAMO
it looks like what happens when you cross a F-15 with a harrier

Attached: 1488815458182.jpg (500x500, 244K)

>has to fly Winchester to look even decent

Sory, can't hear you over the sound of proper A E S T H E T I C S.

Attached: su-27sm3 (1).jpg (1000x1270, 767K)

THICC

Attached: tumblr_muai4sp21r1s42d75o1_1280.jpg (664x443, 51K)

A E S T H E T I C

Attached: f14.jpg (800x387, 34K)

all you plebs need to get a plane with real curves.

Attached: 1200px-IŁ-102_NTW_3_95_1.jpg (1200x735, 159K)

>calling that flying gravestone "proper aesthetics"
vatnik education

Attached: ZXJTAKW.jpg (1920x1080, 497K)

>still flying Winchester
You slavaboos keep getting progressively worse.

Attached: chrome_2017-12-25_00-03-43.png (1037x911, 659K)

HOT

Attached: Macchi_M.67_right_2009-06-06.jpg (2791x1467, 752K)

Attached: F-4 phantom wallpaper.jpg (1400x900, 100K)

>knock SR-71s down
Never happened

>Aesthetically bankrupt seething
As expected of all inferior specimen at the sight of the top aesthetic performance.

Attached: su-27sm3 (7).jpg (902x613, 188K)

not even the best Russian jet let alone an aesthetic one.

Attached: 321245.jpg (1920x1200, 306K)

burgers you disappoint me by not having posting this little lady and leaving it to a bong like me.

Attached: 3ab13b3675886f03793cf4acaef7a73a.jpg (1280x829, 112K)

>suckhoi
>calling anyone else aesthetically bankrupt
hahahahahaha
lemme guess, you go to /sg/ too dont you?

Attached: f4phantom.jpg (2048x1152, 159K)

>trying this hard
>it's STILL flying Winchester

>THE FUCKING FULCRUM

Olds laughs at the both of you.

Attached: Fiat G.55(1).jpg (1005x441, 34K)

PATRICIAN

Attached: Macchi-Castoldi-MC72-6s.jpg (1267x774, 61K)

>*extremely loud Battotai moving at incredibly high decibels*

Attached: d0eccfa7c7ab13fa35113ada7cb45a29.jpg (2030x2059, 245K)

this will always be the most aesthetic thing to ever grace the flying public

Attached: pan am L-1011.jpg (1356x907, 111K)

>Posting an obese flying hydrocephalus
As expected of an amerimutt.
Can't get worse than an amerimutt.
>Posts Fail-4 of all aircraft, the rival to Yak-38U for the title of the ugliest aircraft ever produced
Lol.
Fulcrum is just smaller Flanker. Same thing, essentially.
>Still being an amerimutt

Attached: su-27sm3 (2).jpg (1280x813, 122K)

>Olds laughs at the both of you.
implying being old means you know fuck all, I never said it was good or bad I just said it looks better then the su27 which it does.

Attached: s5kMDmb.jpg (1920x1080, 167K)

>It's S T I L L FLYING WINCHESTER

>vatnik is so brain-dead that he resorts to Jow Forums memes
lamo
that thing is a fat coffin with disposable engines

Attached: blocks your flightpath.jpg (1960x1159, 418K)

doesn't that speak for the dire state of your country fella?


At least post the best one

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1800x1207, 183K)

>posting suckhoi
>calls any other aircraft ugly
i bet youre a euro too.

>flying with no weapons says something about the US not being able to do something about it
No, it means the fucking thing cant fly

you are like a little baby
watch this

Attached: f18 with ww2 paint job.jpg (1024x768, 394K)

Good jobs anons. Now I can post my other love.

Attached: 1418140188897.jpg (700x362, 165K)

tr3b

Attached: ovni-traingular-usa-696x387-1020x536.jpg (1020x536, 21K)

Attached: saab draken.jpg (736x552, 101K)

>russian aircraft flying with no weapons is somehow related to the US

>Amerimutt is still seething
>Resorts to an Jow Forums meme
>Expects anything else in return
>Posts even more flying hydrocephalus
Will amerimutts ever learn?
>Argues the aesthetical superiority of the Flanker
I don't even have to bet, it's obvious only an amerimutt can be this stupid.

Attached: su-27p.jpg (1280x834, 567K)

Be of fucked.

Attached: 43165_1500565264.jpg (1600x1086, 500K)

>Nobody posted her.

What are you, gay?

Attached: 1155587504245.jpg (1596x2000, 417K)

Why does it even need missiles or the Avenger? It can reliably kill people with it's ugliness alone.

didn't mean to link him, meant to link vatnik, have plane instead.

Attached: F-18C_VFA-86_F-14A_VF-102_on_USS_America_(CV-66)_1991.jpg (3000x1997, 2.75M)

>ITS
>STILL
>FLYING
>WINCHESTER

This and basically any F-16 variant/derivative.

Attached: JASDF_Mitsubishi_F-2_(16)[1].jpg (1920x1280, 1.41M)

don't worry, i'm here to replace you
>heh nothing personal kid

Attached: a-29_over_afghanistan.jpg (1200x739, 204K)

Attached: 3231.png (1078x559, 498K)

>a fucking black triangle

Attached: starfighter.jpg (881x657, 84K)

looks like you need to learn to save decent resolution photos of planes, let me help you with that.

Attached: 1520948607590.jpg (2680x1802, 258K)

Not as hot as the 72 though. The M72 is like the fucking chad of seaplanes.

Awww yaaah girl

Attached: THRUST INTENSIFIES.jpg (800x600, 45K)

Yeah, they go for between 85 and 140k and piston twins are easy to finance.

Not one Valkyrie in this whole thread

Attached: image.jpg (300x237, 77K)

>It's still a seething amerimutt

Attached: su-27sm3 (9).jpg (1500x1013, 912K)

american planes just LOOK like killing machines.
like these things are itching to shove an AIM-9x right up your ass.
slav planes look like the engineer had too much to drink that morning and maintainers are hoping it doesnt fall apart mid-air

Attached: f15.jpg (2207x1932, 784K)

>boris cant even read over his own posts
you must be blind
that explains why you like that target-with-wings

The only blinds here are the meager ones who turn away from the beauty of Su-27.

Attached: su-27m (1).jpg (1219x1500, 261K)

Attached: 25123317631_6179e6dae5_o.jpg (1200x800, 524K)

Attached: kahdha5261112f.jpg (1920x1080, 275K)

Also, dont ask me why But the Crusader and corsair II just look rad to me.

Attached: 1964671.jpg (1280x865, 753K)

is that meant to be an aggressors camouflage?
pretty cool, haven't seen it before if so.

Attached: bac_lightning.jpg (1024x768, 188K)

if you don't look at the front the corsiar it kind of looks like an Su-25

Attached: thumb-350-380182.jpg (350x219, 17K)

The Corsair II looks like a proto-Boeing JSF.

Attached: boeing JSF.jpg (1000x831, 120K)

I -think- so. F-16s see a lot of aggressor work, and I know the navy's F-16s wore jet black for a year or two but thats no Navy 16.

Attached: mig-29k 9.31 (1).jpg (900x602, 46K)

Controversial opinion of the day. We should have kept the A-7 and dropped the A-10. Better bomb truck, and we already had 2 seaters making delivery of PGM and combat air control easier.

Attached: 0969184.jpg (1024x780, 459K)

Valkyrie is lewd

Attached: IMG_20180328_151036-2024x1518.jpg (2024x1518, 755K)

oh my.

Attached: rafhawkredb.jpg (550x323, 28K)

A man of culture I see

Attached: 1521928056078.jpg (1600x1067, 218K)

>six exhausts, more than enough to propel anything that moves

more like lawn dart enthusiast.

Attached: GVW5wx5.jpg (2880x1800, 422K)

Those F-104Gs are much further away from that beautiful German countryside than I'd expect them to be.

Attached: 0408693.jpg (1600x1079, 866K)

thicc

>6 x 128 kN
2 x 245 kN

Attached: tu-22m3 (6).jpg (1280x979, 528K)

on a completely unrelated note and on something i didn't know i wanted until now does anyone have any pictures of planes with livestock around them like this? kinda looks cute.

Attached: 1518624119304.jpg (1920x1080, 431K)

4 x 245 kN

Attached: tu-160 (3).jpg (1200x813, 110K)

4 x 157 kN

Attached: t-4 (4).jpg (1120x840, 217K)

2x 513KN lmao thrustlets are you even trying

Attached: THIQQW AF.jpg (1290x726, 200K)

4 x 137 kN

Attached: b-1b.jpg (2000x1333, 302K)

6 x 230 kN
Bite me.

Attached: an-225 (1).jpg (1595x700, 259K)