What are some Jow Forums approved philosophers?
What are some Jow Forums approved philosophers?
Jason Ross
Jonathan Rodriguez
Marcus Aurelius
Alexander Sanchez
Philosophy is the sign of a man more concerned with hypotheticals than he is concerned with the physical. All your bullshit psycho mumbo jumbo can be undone by a 10 cent bullet in 0.25 seconds.
Parker James
>what is analytic philosophy
Thomas Anderson
Jayden Thompson
>big words hurt
Julian Torres
Is that some kind of space artillerary?
Juan Barnes
Luis Richardson
Ernst Junger definitely
Henry Gutierrez
Robert Cooper
>he thinks the material is the real world
>he thinks the material is all that matters
Marx would give you a reach around right now
Evan Rivera
Juan White
Yes, he sucked at economics but he got one thing right
Julian Carter
Harvey milk
Carter Robinson
good fuck this corporeal form
Gabriel Ward
curtis lemay
Juan Cook
Read this
Noah Green
David Hogg
Mason Watson
>muh natural tights!
How is high school these days user?
Isaiah Sanchez
Huey newton
Gavin King
Lord humongous
Daniel Campbell
Henry Davis
Patton
Leo Thompson
Yes, the workers. He would love to disarm the burgeois however, so think again.
Dominic Diaz
Sun Tzu
Miyamoto Mushashi
Carson Sullivan
zizek is the man, one of the few commies I could actually expect high level discourse from.
rousseau is also one of the OG advocates for citizens' militias, so he definitely deserves some credit for that.
Dominic Bennett
These and Thomas Sowell (He served in the Marine Corps, so he's Jow Forums-related)
Cameron Collins
Zizek is the Alex Jones of philosophy: He's more of a meme that's fun to laugh at than a genuine source of information. Why do you think all the things he says are so convoluted instead of actually shedding some sort of knowledge of how the world works.Rousseau is good though.
Nicholas Howard
Evola
David Carter
>If I can't understand what he's saying, he's crazy!''
Ask him to use smaller words, maybe some pictures
Ryder Edwards
Richard Rorty was a commie leftist but admitted that morality would often come down to reaching for your gun.
Ayden Bell
I mean, smaller words really wouldn't help the situation since he's just sputing Derrida-influenced bullshit. That's why analytic philosophy is king: it's to the point and more direct not to mention it can encompass any statement in continental philosophy and derive it's truth value in a given logical system. At times it's just plain autistic, like when it took 200 or 300 pages for Bertrand Russel to prove 1+1 =2, but you could follow the proof and it wasn't obtuse, just long.
Nicholas King
Best post.
Jacob Howard
Antman
Dylan Reyes
Philosophy is vital to Jow Forums as it tells you who you need to shoot at. Sometimes it isn't as obvious as instinct would suggest.
Tyler Watson
>he hasn't ascended to his planar form
Juan Ortiz
This.
Hello platoni/k/ friend.
Easton Long
Colton Collins
Jeremiah Perry
Fucking kek. Every marxist regime disarmed the workers after gaining power. Marxism is singlehandedly responsible for the decline of the west.
Cameron Garcia
>all the leftishit philsophers itt
Holy shit, leftypol has infested this board
Adrian Russell
Nope lefty Jow Forums has invaded this board.
Jose Gray
Jordan Peterson
Owen Martin
Christian Sanders
Lincoln Howard
No such thing. Leftism is always an anti-gun collectivist ideology.
Cooper Martinez
spengler is Jow Forums as fuck. not only were all if his predictions true, he was truly Jow Forums
>and collecting ancient turkish, persian and indian weapons
Marxism is responsible for the death of the west.
Joshua Brown
William Bailey
It's mostly Leninism to blame, not just Marxism. The big boys in control of the revolutions (e.g. Bolsheviks) were power hungry dictators of the proletariat. They were paranoid of reactionaries and counter-revolutionaries so it made sense to them to disarm the populace. Then you see the same Leninist ideas of disarmament happening in China, etc. Marx himself really did emphasize that the workers should always be armed.
Landon Garcia
Marxist regime is an oxymoron. There haven't been and can't be a Marxist regime due to the fundamentals of Marxism.
t. Ancap
Liam Reed
Marx never said anything about weapons after the revolution retard. Do you think you will be able to abolish private property and businesses without a monopoly on force?
Camden Perry
>Marx never said anything about weapons after the revolution retard.
Can you not read?
"Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary."
This isn't specific to pre-revolution.
The Marxist definition of private property is different from today's private property. The Marxist definition refers to property that is used by capitalists to exploit worker labor like land, machinery, tools, etc.. It's not the same thing as a house, a gun, or a toothbrush. Those are referred to as personal property.
t. not a Marxist
Juan Long
>This isn't specific to pre-revolution.
With the fucking context it literally is you mongoloid leftypolian. That quote comes from the communist manifesto which is a call to revolution.
You are not going to be able to deprive people of land they own and businesses they own without a monopoly on force. What if somebody doesn't want to live in a shitty commieblock and wants to work so they can build up wealth for themselves and have an easier life? You need a monopoly on force to prevent that.
Marxist regimes need a monopoly on force. Unlike the USSR, at least Nazi Germany made gun laws much laxer for the vast majority of the populace.
Liam Butler
incorrect brainlet usage
correct brainlet usage
Aaron King
Unless he actually likes Petereson. That is better than a lot of other options.
Aaron Thomas
Aristotle is The Philosopher.
"Animals have just one method of defense and cannot change it for another. For man, on the other hand, has many means of defense that are available and he can change them at anytime. Take the hand. The hand is as good as a talon, or a claw, or a horn, or again a spear, or a sword, or any other weapon or tool, that it could be all of these ”
Zachary Perez
>people who have 0 knowledge on the topic at hand calling anyone who knows what they're talking about communist
Jonathan Sanchez
You just made a philosophical statement.
Well spooked my property.
Aiden Sanders
Socrates.
Gavin Clark
Wyatt Miller
Parker Bennett
Gabriel Lee
It’s a microscope
Andrew James
Ethan Rogers
Locke. In his Treatise on Government (actual title longer but you can find it) he lays down the philosophical basis for castle doctrine.
>the world is dog eat dog
>law and order is the only thing holding back total mayhem
>if a person shows they're willing to steal, there is no reason to believe they won't also kill, so kill them first
Jacob Cook
He’s lying
Austin Ross
@37355934
Jonathan Torres
How? I bet you think the two party system is a good idea, sicophant.
Aaron Jones
>Unlike the USSR, at least Nazi Germany made gun laws much laxer for the vast majority of the populace.
Except for the Jews, Slavs, Gypsies and anyone else that wasn't Germanic. So yeah, the Nazis were no better than the Soviets in that they used their monopoly of force to commit atrocities against certain groups of people.
Cooper Morales
>you mongoloid leftypolian
Yep. You can't read. I said I'm not a Marxist already. I just read some of their shit.
>You are not going to be able to deprive people of land they own and businesses they own without a monopoly on force. What if somebody doesn't want to live in a shitty commieblock and wants to work so they can build up wealth for themselves and have an easier life? You need a monopoly on force to prevent that.
This has nothing to do with gun ownership, disarmament, or Marx's stance on guns.
>Marxist regimes need a monopoly on force.
Already agree with you on that.
>Unlike the USSR, at least Nazi Germany made gun laws much laxer for the vast majority of the populace.
>unironically defending the Nazis
Isaiah Hughes
>Except for the Jews, Slavs, Gypsies and anyone else that wasn't Germanic. So yeah, the Nazis were no better than the Soviets in that they used their monopoly of force to commit atrocities against certain groups of people.
The vast majority of Germany at the time was ethnically German. So, no, here isn't a comparison. Sure attacking minorities is wrong, but attacking more people is always worse.
Colton Roberts
If he were alive today, he'd probably be on here or Jow Forums screeching that we're all boot-licking statist cucks for not illegally converting our combat rifles to full-auto and smuggling in RPG-7s.
Juan Davis
Samuel Gray
Why doesn't he do it then?
Isaiah Brown
Brody Thomas
Libertarian varieties of leftism definitely are not anti gun. Anarchism and syndicalism are generally (or at traditionally) very pro gun.
Tyler Nelson
Never thought I'd agree with an ancap about something regarding Marxism, but this is true. Marxism as Marx wrote it is supposed to be antithetical to any sort of regime.
Daniel Butler
James Gomez
You're a barbarian.
Gabriel Anderson
>Sure attacking minorities is wrong, but attacking more people is always worse.
So with this logic you should be a big fan of socialist revolutions since the bourgeoisie who are being attacked comprimise an minority, and an oppressive one at that. Fuckin Nazis and tankies are two sides of the same coin.
Carter Harris
This.
Chase Reed
>So with this logic you should be a big fan of socialist revolutions since the bourgeoisie who are being attacked comprimise an minority, and an oppressive one at that. Fuckin Nazis and tankies are two sides of the same coin.
You show no knowledge of actual socialist revolutions. The one in Russia did not target just the very rich. It targeted tons of everyday Russians and Christians, who were the majority of the country.
No, commies are definitely worse.
Aiden Green
Not an argument.
The vast majority saw gun laws loosened.
Do you really think commie regimes would allow liberal gun laws? You are a goddamn fool.
Isaac Sanchez
The Cuban revolution targetted a minority for sure. It had the support of the large majority of the population. I'm just saying your utilitarian justification for Nazism can be used by your political opponents as well. Tyranny is tyranny and natural rights are natural, not granted by a majority.
Aaron Fisher
"Fuck the king." - George Washington(probably)
David Gomez
Good slave
Henry Russell
True story
Luis Hernandez
This post greatly concerns me.
Josiah Brooks
Chase Anderson
>tfw you will never be as chad as Diogenes
Ryan Bennett
You heard the man. Kill yourself. For Jesus
Michael Perez
You are a pleb. Evola is a traditionalist who was not favorable to christianity because he thought it had a slave mentality. Read a book lefty fag.
Alexander Cruz
>The first shitposter
F
Caleb Nguyen
>Do you really think commie regimes would allow liberal gun laws? You are a goddamn fool.
When did I ever say they would? I've already agreed with you that the Bolsheviks disarmed the people. That's a fact. But the problem with this is not Marx's position or quote on gun ownership. It has to do with the cancerous idea of Leninism which means you have a group of "elite proletariat" that leads the revolution because they're power hungry and they think they're the most qualified.
The path from capitalism to communism is supposed to be like this:
1) Start with a capitalist society
2) Workers led by a vanguard party (Leninism) start a revolution to take control of the country
3) Vanguard party (e.g. Bolsheviks) become the new leaders of the country
4) Socialism begins; in the USSR's case, EVERYTHING was owned by the state; all industry and business was state-controlled; some people argue whether or not this was actual socialism because the workers themselves did not own the means of production, the state did
5) After a while, the government is supposed to disband and society becomes classless, stateless, and moneyless. This end goal is called communism. But we both know the problem with this. It's that those people in power, the Bolsheviks, don't want to give it up, because they're in such a high position of power.
History shows that no one has ever come close to reaching step 5. Again, I'm not a leftist. I've just done some research.
Jacob Murphy
>In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of some phony philosophy, but because I am enlightened by my own intelligence.
Lincoln Robinson
This.
Also C.S. Lewis.
>trench fighter in WWI
>was the second most famous wartime BBC radio presenter in WWII (Churchill was #1, obviously)
>wrote kids books that glorify courage and just warfare
>Perelandra ends with one of the most unexpectedly violent twists in modern literature
>gave one of the best thrashings of pacifism in the last century - youtube.com
>said that in some cases, peace is sinful
Justin Sanders
>hurr durr he said kys
Did your mother drop you down a flight of stairs?
Daniel Ramirez
He wrote a book about using Japanese swords. It's an instruction manual made for its day, not a philosophy book.
Joshua Lewis
a fedora image doesn't justify the ascended edgelord faggotry of egoism. Just fuck off with your hipster variant of nihilism you colossal faggot.
Ayden Hernandez
>I am enlightened by my own intelligence.
*bullets