siliconrepublic.com
denver.cbslocal.com
zerohedge.com
Nope.
lol, let's see someone actually build a single working example of a reactor first.
Planes crashing is rare, but when they crash they are spectacular and explode
What happens to the ((((compact fusion reactor))))) when it crashes into the ground
Not much. It would just be hot for a few seconds. Fusion isn't a bomb.
>fusion and fission are the same thing
sasuga chocolate
Several working fusion reactors have been built, that’s not the issue
But seriously, why is lockheed making all this up? what do they hope to gain from lying about this?Are they pulling a musk and hope to gain contracts via popularity alone?
False.
>inb4 farnsworth reactors.
>What happens to the ((((compact fusion reactor))))) when it crashes into the ground
the containment fails and the extremely hot 500 ml of gas simply dissipates
bump for interest
>fission is the same as fusion
american education
Uh huh, do they produce more energy then it takes to sustain them?
how will this help us expel 30 million illegal invaders that are conquering the country right now?
we need less weapons to fight bullshit and fictional enemies and more weapons to fight real enemies.
>that’s not too the issue
Can you read
Usually, can you write?
Actually, thinking about this, they could install these mini reactos on large naval vessels and use them to power railguns
As if this will be real within 50 years
While it would be a good idea to upgrade, don't naval vessels already have fission reactors?
Pretty sure that only applies to carriers. Other surface combatants/vessels still run on liquid fuel. It's still why we have tanker for refueling
bump
the fact that this hasn't been classified means that it's bullshit and that it doesn't work.
your mom is classified
>patents it when Russia is already fielding theirs
Fishing for more funding I suspect.