Just turn them in...

‘Assault’ weapons existed at the time fo the founding fathers so to say the 2nd amendment only applies to muskets is ridiculous

Attached: 91EC14CE-C1C5-4B3C-84B1-F4D5D236F390.png (500x716, 126K)

Could you make a musket that looks like an ar? It'd be sort of hilarious.

"well-regulated militia" in 1776 meant the citizenry were adequately equipped for national defense/war.

Type of armament is deliberately not specified. The 2nd amendment includes all state of the art weaponry. meaning warships and cannon at the time, as well as any form of personal firearms or manual weaponry.

of course, back then we didn't just let anyone be a citizen.

Of course this is bait but that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be argued against.
Newfags need to know where we stand and they need to see us argue so they can apply our arguements when they are inevitably confronting irl

Expected. From a choconigger

'of course, back then we didn't just let anyone be a citizen.' How FNN TRUE .

Fuck off faggot

I agree: When the 19th amendment was passed women just weren't like they were now. Times have changed, shouldn't our voting laws?

Theres a reason the term "lurk more, fag" exsists.

Attached: 1518449337792.jpg (2514x1950, 907K)

there ya go.

Attached: well regulated militia.jpg (1517x1496, 513K)

The interpretation of the term "Regulated" has been twisted.
When the term Regulated was used, it was used to promote an active direction for the militia and thus means the legal code must allow for the active promotion and combat readiness of a militia.
For a militia to be functionally active they must then be allowed viable weaponry to achieve objective successes in their mission statements.
So technically right now the lawmakers are in violation of this, as militias require military grade equipment to be even near effective.

Attached: regualte.jpg (645x366, 48K)

'Well-Regulated' in 18th Century terms means "In good working order."

Language changes, just because our meaning of the word regulated changed with time doesn't mean the original point did. If you read an old book and they call someone gay in the context of being happy, do you genuinely believe they meant gay in the context of homosexual?

But if everyone just said ‘bait’ and moves on, newfags will never learn.
Far better to cut the fishing wire than just leave the bait hanging

fun, innit lad?

>and thus means the legal code must allow for the active promotion and combat readiness of a militia.

Yeah, the various national guards are allowed pretty much whatever they want. Feel free to join, or at least try to.

>that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be argued against.
That's exactly what it means.

Reminder that the deadliest shooting in recent memory was carried out with a pair of handguns.

Read the rest you moron.

Attached: 7D61D26E-B2C6-44CF-B5B2-85361254CB88.jpg (919x1024, 52K)

According to the Dick Act, as amended, those people were exactly a “well regulated militia”. They stopped being so at the moment they turned their weapons against their fellow citizens in the absence of legal orders to do so.

I mean, they're not wrong on either account.
None of those people are a member of the militia, and they aren't allowed to own that gun, which isn't a musket.

of course i need one, have you seen how many shootings there's been in the year? christ, even the kids have them

Then you have no right to complain when People of Color get greased by cops.

Attached: 1522256280090.png (500x881, 138K)

Attached: 1522629497541.jpg (480x640, 136K)

Let me translate that for you:
>give the state more power and ability to initiate force against people who have done no moral wrongs, so we can keep avoiding dealing with root causes

Attached: 1501470755508.gif (320x320, 240K)

Attached: 1521328679034.jpg (736x706, 106K)

Well according to the Cock Act, YOU are wrong boi!

Your mom amended my dick act last night

>The national guard, a state run force, fills the roles of militias

Attached: 1519098880074.gif (450x551, 213K)

the puckle gun was basically a revolver musket
you still had to add new powder for each shot
it was not a machine gun by modern definition

Not even trying

2/10

Fact still stands, and add the girandoni air rifle, which had a 20 round magazine.
>amendments need updating
No, or else we'd be stuck with using printing presses and ink quills.

>when the second amendment clearly applies to muskets.
And the 1st amendment only applies to print presses, clearly.

Attached: no cuts!.gif (242x167, 2M)

weren't those rare and hard to get ? let alone practical ?

SAGE GOES IN EVERY FIELD

Attached: eJwVx8kNwyAQAMBeKIDliDnczQqjBQUDgs3LSu9R5jeP-KwmTlGY5z4BrrrTWJfcPBZSljQGtYyzbpnGDciMqdy58wYTDmeV80EH (128x128, 9K)

Kinda like assault rifles today?

where the fuck does the second amendment say "musket' and why do libs keep saying this

>Occupy Democrats
And into the trash it goes.

I was going to call bait, but you're probably talking about retarded laws or exorbitant price for certain pieces.

No, I was asking about how hard they were to acquire physically, not because of price or law, but numbers, spare parts, actual usefulness, etc...

plus volley guns are one shot and extremely inaccurate. Don't tell me the volley rifle wasn't already made obsolete by contemporary coachguns

I need one should I decide it’s time to kill.

Attached: B9BA6601-DD12-4630-907F-8E5767035BC8.jpg (500x331, 64K)

>it was not a machine gun by modern definition
Neither is an AR-15. Also fuck off soros shill.

fuck you

I'm tired of bait threads you stupid shit.

But why would it say arms instead of muskets?

Attached: 1499253398845.jpg (1377x1540, 338K)

>when someone commit mass shooting
>push more gun control

>when a muslim commit act of terrorist
>shut the fuck up you fear mongering bigot

I cannot believe this shit. I just cant believe border security is even an issue. At this point Trump needs to turn to the people in a public address and call out the Democrats for what they are really doing. Importing millions of illegals for votes.

This is literally what happened. Planes flew into the towers and Bush comes out and says Not all Muslims are bad!
A few psycos shoot up a school, club, etc. Ban guns!!!!!

Easiest board to troll

You're half right.

Why should I be limited to AR-15's when the intent of the law was for the citizenry to be as well armed as the individual infantryman?

I should be unfettered in my desire to own a new M240.

Trump was a Trojan democrat. He won’t save you. Keep prepping. You’re about to fight for your survival

Why do you need a computer to post on the internet. You have a printing press.

At this point the Army needs to start setting up machine gun nests on the border and just fucking obliterating anyone that tries crossing illegally. It is un-fucking-believable that a nation with a bigger military budget than the combined GDP of Africa and access to surveillance technology out of an Orwellian nightmare is incapable of securing a fucking border.

You’re delusional if you think that small group of unarmed, uneducated shitters are worth prepping over
Keep larping

I know that. Hes in love with Dreamers (illegals). He falsely believes that granting amnesty will gain him votes for reelection. Same with gun bans and democrats.
Hes a delusional fuck wit. That will likely end up costing us all of our gun rights.
All of us should have backed Ted Cruz

the first automatic machine gun was invented in 1726. The founding fathers knew what guns would become.

Attached: Puckle-machine-Gun.png (594x427, 425K)

Rich people don't want poor people to have freedoms.

You are absolutley right.
However I have a fool proof plan. Land mines. No shit. It works in Afghanistan.
Litter our southern border with land mines. Signs for miles. Shit will go down for a week. Then after the media crys.
They will stop coming over the fence.

US military cares more about Syrian and Afghan borders than the US borders. In fact, US military fought more wars to defend foreign countries than their own.

US borders are wide-open.