Aim Surplus Beretta 92s

What do you think, k? Buy or pass? Don't exactly need another 9x19, but it's cheap as hell.

Attached: F1BER92S17XA.jpg (800x520, 78K)

Other urls found in this thread:

gunbroker.com/item/768620730
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

quality double stack 9mm for less than 3 bills.
It is a good deal. Doesnt hurt to just have another gun around.

its a good deal but its not that desirable of a gun. if you dont like the 92s dont buy it. dont buy thing just cause its there and cheap. if you like it buy it.

To me that heel release is a dealbreaker, but may not be for others

The front sight sucks but the one I got is like new

I love mine.
it shows alot of holster wear. but internals are fine. functions flawlessly.
Heel mag release is literally no big deal i actually like it alot

Attached: 92.jpg (2016x1512, 878K)

>its not that desirable of a gun
your giving good advice. but that part is a subjective opinion.

ok i have to admit. yes, the sights do kind of suck. but are probably fine if you have good eyes

Attached: 20170203_173309.jpg (4032x3024, 3.38M)

if these cost the same as actual new 92fs you think people would still buy these 92s? or would all of them just buy 92fs?
nah man the mag release is a negative. its not a huge one but its enough.

Seemed bretty gud.
I was looking at it weeks ago, backed off when i found it had a small welded front sight.
Still a great deal just something that made me less interested

>if these cost the same as actual new 92fs
but they don't. they are about half the price of of a 92fs
>the mag release is a negative
that is still mostly subjective opinion. it is just a slight difference in battery of arms to use the heel mag release. might mean a tenth of a second difference in overall reloading speed only noticeable for the fastest elite operators

I got one when JG was selling them for $250. It's a nice gun for the money. I have larger hands, and I find it very comfortable to hold and shoot. As others mentioned, the sights suck. That's about the only complaint I have. I like that everything is made of metal. It makes the gun feel robust and high quality. I understand newer Beretta 92fs handguns have a lot of plastic parts which isn't necessarily a bad thing. I just tend to prefer metal.

I had one. It shot very nice, but the DA trigger and non replacable front sights killed it for me. Wife hated it too. Sold it to friend who promptly put a spring from a 96 in it to clean up the trigger, says it's real nice.

Terrible sights, would not recommend

Call me when they have surplus 92f(s)

Shitty sights and stupid mag button placement kill it for me

Attached: 1358740615013.png (400x400, 7K)

go build a timemachine. posurp 92fs were common like 2 decades ago. they still pop up but its really rare.

They've been coming in from Israel for a few years now. Keep an eye out on CDI Sales and Mach1 Arsenal on gunbroker. I've even seen a few stainless models pop up. Right now, CDI has this:

gunbroker.com/item/768620730

Good deal. You can sell it in a few years for a little profit if you want as well. Even got some 30 round mags for it. THE FUN NEVER ENDS.
t.it was my first pistol

If I didn't live in CA I would have bought one by now. Or two. Or a dozen.

Yes, buy it.
I actually fingerfucked an early import 92S in an LGS. The heel release is pretty comfy, but it does make it a 2-handed reload. You can reach it with your pinky if you have long fingers though.

Unfortunately they wanted $600 for that one and some idiot JB welded S&W revolver sights on it that aren't anywhere near aligned. Because it's off roster if I want to buy a 92S that's pretty much my only option.

Why do you have such a moronic nigger tier fucking trip

whats the matter? were you expecting some cool trip like "Queerbait" or "mooseshit"?

that's one of the prettiest guns i've seen in a while