What does anti ship missiles use for target designation? I know Russian skimmers pop up, which is bad since it lessens radar horizon and negates stealth. That's why Chinese ships laugh at the Harpoon since it is useless against Chinese ships. But what about other missiles? A frogman lazing a moving ship? A plan WVR lasing a ship? A drone?
What does anti ship missiles use for target designation? I know Russian skimmers pop up...
Jayden Gomez
Isaac Lee
nice chinkpost
Colton Thomas
fuck off chink nigger
Jaxon Turner
Nice try, Wang!
Jose Ramirez
almost worked but you made sloppy mistakes that show this is fake
Hunter Gutierrez
Animal Farm
Tianenman Square 1989
六四事件
William Walker
what is that supposed to mean?
Nicholas Lee
I think he's trying to activate the Winter Soldier.
Juan Johnson
does that work? if so that's genius
If the person is chinashill the chinese national "independent thought" filters might kill their connection to the thread
Landon Diaz
>Posts Soviet helicopter.
>Talks about Chinese supremacy
>"N-no Russian!"
Cameron Allen
IMPRESSIVE
William Stewart
Not Chinese here but it's not that hard to understand why people like Chinese military. Because it has shown quite a fast progress with very efficient designs and impressive performance. Even African governments are now buying Chinese because of its superior price to performance ratio. The Soviet helicopter is because it is carrying a missile that is far less effective than the Chinese equivalent. And using American photos of its useless Harpoon is very dehumanizing since it is really useless. That is why a lot of people in this forum ask, Why can't Russia just buy Chinese?
Anthony Wood
Its just a retarded meme started by a fat jap faggots on Jow Forums believe it
Jose Martinez
Because Chinese technology is Quangtung™ based. Meaning, it exist in between reality and fiction until you open the Aliexpress box and inevitable collapse the hype-waveform to the mediocre reality.
Nathaniel Bell
Aliexpress is a good company though. I've bought a lot of things using it. Far better than ebay or Amazon.
Parker Bennett
>Not buying military armaments from the Wish app
Jeremiah Hernandez
>Quangtung™
Blake Watson
Lel
Elijah Lewis
a modern classic of a post. congrats.
Juan Cook
>does that work? if so that's genius
Adrian Bell
Most long-range anti-ship missiles are fired with a programmed inertial guidance trajectory and target data from the launching plane’s radar.
Once the missile is close enough it then turns on its own active radar to home in on the target.
Lucas Morris
Ethan Baker
Lucas Wood
Daily reminder that chinkroaches aren't people and never will be and should be treated like the disposable cock roach people they are.
Alexander Baker
Gook shill, pls go.
Liam Barnes
>That's why Chinese ships laugh at the Harpoon since it is useless against Chinese ships.
Spoiler alert, all AShMs are useless against a defended enemy ship. Defenseless target, or defenses turned off.:
94 out of 111, pHit = 84.7% for 64 ships OOA and 27 sunk. This includes merchant ships.
Maneuvering but otherwise defenseless target:
32 out of 67, pHit of 47.8% for 16 OOA and 12 sunk. This includes merchant ships.
With either ECM, chaff, or anti missile hard kill systems: 0 hit out of 59 launches, pHit: 0%, This includes defenses by Russian, Georgian, Egyptian, Israeli, Iranian, Iraqi, Pakistani, Indian, and the majority being from the USN (we’ve been shot at a lot!)
Hell I could sail a single vessel equipped solely with ECMs, Chaff, and decoys and safely sail through the middle of a warzone. Looking at this, even if an armada came up with 100 AShMs it would only expect to have 1-2 missiles actually strike the opposing fleet. Why is this? Are ECM, Chaff, decoys really so good that AShM manufacturing cannot overcome them, except by having the enemy turn theirs off?
In before, while those are all old AShM and thus the new ones completely rewrite the equation. Well, the only Chinese missiles that haven’t been used and countered (YJ-12, YJ-18, and DF-21), so more than 95% of Chinese anti-ship missiles in their inventory have completely failed to score a single hit on a US vessel despite more than 20 attempts. Further the untested ones all travel much faster, and thus have significantly less processing time (1/3 for YJ-12 and Yj-18, 1/11 for DF-21) to sort the real return from decoys and fakes, making them significantly more susceptible to ECM and Chaff.
Thinkdefence.co.uk
Arrse.co.uk
navy-net.co.uk
defencetalk.com (section navy - Royal Navy)
warships1discussionboards.yuku.com
ukdefenceforum.net
warships1discussionboards.yuku.com
Jaxon Ross
Some have IR guidance instead which is why they had to upgrade RAM
Levi Ross
What are these 59 combat ashm launches
Hunter Stewart
I saw cock then presumed sleeve was the next word. I was disappointed to see that it was not
Sebastian Fisher
>Quangtung™ based
Anthony Jackson
Anthony Stewart
t. Chang
六四事件
Logan Parker
>A frogman lazing a moving ship
That frogman is going to end up deader than a nigger on a cross in a KKK meeting, ships these days are made so they can identify lasing and autonomously take aim on the location of the laser.
Preferred method is two-point-spotting, but most probably on the open ocean there's going to be at least some sort of radar involvement