We've been through this already. That pantsir wasn't operating.
That's exactly was the article is saying.
Tyler Nguyen
the pantsir is only the start of the issue. the IDF has been running sorties on syrian airspace for a long time, and they have had minimal issue with AA.
Joshua Clark
That's not a Jow Forums problem but a Jow Forums one.
Grayson Jones
The Russians stated that it wasn't operating. They also said that they would shoot down incoming missiles from the US, France, and UK. They didn't. it just seems like their making up alot of excuses at this point.
Jayden Ortiz
nigga what? the fact that the IDF has been able to conduct massive amounts of sorties over Syrian airspace with minimal issue from Russian AA equipment is indicative of a larger issue in either doctrine or equipment. >inb4 muh arabs
Camden Reed
Russian weapons have always been overhyped. Every once in a blue moon they shoot down a western jet and somehow act like that is proof of their dominance. What they don't mention is the literal thousands of missiles launched per airplane hit. During operation shock and awe there were over 6000 SAMs launched and not a single american aircraft was hit.
Parker Collins
even if it was operating i doubt it would have made much of a difference. the IDF has been able to destroy or negate syrian AA plenty in the past.
Connor Collins
>caught with our pantsir down kek
Jaxon Scott
This >anti air system is not active >gets destroyed before activated >XXDDD RUSSIA BTFO >SAMS IZ MAGIC M SHIET Also >Pantsir >new Apply shovel directly to the forehead
Evan Martin
Russian AA only good for shooting down airliners.
Blake Hall
seethe pantsir is just indicative of a larger issue in syrian/russian dialogue.
Bentley Thomas
>caught with our pantsir down Kek But SAM's aren't perfect i.e. Patriot
Luke Thomas
Mongoloid shit is obsolete and breaks down constantly. NATO and USA would btfo Russia in less than a week.
Ethan Phillips
oh boy this meme again
Carter Green
>IT WAS BUT IT WAS FACING THE WRONG DIRECTION >CAUGHT WITH OUR PANTSIR DOWN
Why are they pointing to this one instance of a stowed Pantsir-S1 getting destroyed as "Russian air defenses don't work".
The Pantsir-S1 has been downing drones, mortars, and rockets fairly constantly in Syria. As for why no Israeli jets got shot; that's just means their stand off weapons are being utilized. As we know that F-16I have been shot down by S-125 before.
Samuel Lee
Also (I'm not an expert) but why not use BUK's they're clearly superior to the pantsir
Isaac Cox
This as well
Luke Adams
>The Pantsir-S1 has been downing drones, mortars, and rockets fairly constantly in Syria. while this may be true, its not nears as much as it should be, or as much as needed. it more of an issue with doctrine.
Using BUK is fine, they need to be placed properly so to have best coverage.
Unfortunately the Syrians have a shit air defense doctrine.
All their medium and long range stuff (BUK, S-125, S-300, 9K33 Osa) is part of the Syrian Air Defense Forces.
All of their Shilkas, TOR, Pantsir-S1, Tunguska; SHORAD/SPAAG systems are part of the Syrian Arab Army.
As such they're not side-by-side nor working together.. which their supposed to in a proper Intergrated Air Defense System. A Pantsir-S1 would work far better if it got fore warning by the BUK mast search radars instead of relying on its own small dish.