Grenade launcher and suppressor combos

I am the one true slavemaster motherfuckers

>posts a picture of a welfare queen
I would NEVER save a picture of somebody who serves israel.

Attached: PicsArt_07-12-12.42.59.jpg (360x360, 40K)

LEAVE NIGGERS

REEEEEEEEEEEE

Attached: a-marine-from-the-2nd-light-armored-infantry-battalion-attached-to-marine-forces-2aedb2.jpg (2820x1810, 2.45M)

>posters: 8
>user posts: 7 including this one
What is happening

Attached: man-40057_960_720.png (590x720, 59K)

Suppressor pushes muzzle blast/sound forward and acts like a muzzle brake at the same time. It's really useful if you can handle the extra weight and length

If you can't a few extra inches and ounces, you're a pathetic weakling anyway.

Attached: a-member-of-the-marine-detachment-from-the-nuclear-powered-aircraft-carrier-b03787.jpg (2400x3376, 1.85M)

chicks dig it

Attached: glssc.jpg (1024x683, 101K)

russia made 30mm suppressed grenade launchers

Attached: bs-1_0.jpg (650x212, 25K)

Disregard this I suck cock

is the grenade also suppressed
I know they make silent bullets*; can they make grenades that blow up at hearing-safe decibel levels too

---
*forgottenweapons.com/russian-silent-ammunition/

Attached: ammo-compare.jpg (941x768, 119K)

y tho

AESTHETIC

That's a beauty.

Attached: 10th Mountain Division Grenadier Haiti.jpg (2560x1700, 550K)

this

Because then you can ambush people and blow them up without them being able to figure out where you are. Most likely it's for counter-terrorism use in very urban environments.

You can't really make a grenade suppressible since it's designed to kill by hurling shrapnel around.

>bottom handguard still in place
>carry handle to rail adapter to rail mount to carry handle mount

Attached: img093.jpg (1024x768, 117K)

NOU

You can if you violate the geneva convention

Attached: chem.jpg (1536x1024, 256K)

you could also make a sphere with a bunch of barrels radiating from the center featuring gas-trap devices. Would have to be very large to do anything though and is generally a retarded idea

Nathan Bedford Forrest has multiplied.

Attached: maximum violence.jpg (536x619, 407K)

>those textures

>M320

Also is that the Dutch Army?

Attached: vomiting pepe.jpg (228x221, 6K)

Fan-made maps tend to be shit.

Attached: Navy SEAL Howard Wasdin HDV.jpg (1919x1080, 349K)

>M320

What's wrong with it, frogposter?

Yes, Dutch SF before they switched to HK416.

Attached: DRkYE22W4AAVeX3 (1).jpg (2048x1536, 440K)

Sneaki Breeki

The m320 is objectively better in every way than the m203, especially in standalone configuration.
Double action, can take more types of ammo, and built-in leaf sights.
I've carried both, and I'd choose the 320 over the 203 any day of the week. The only downside is the weight, but again, anybody who's anybody uses it in standalone mode

>shorter barrel
>objectively not ambidextrous despite claiming to be
The only reason I'd say it's better than a 203 is that it can load long-ass guided munitions without removing the barrel. Also, the fact that most commands mandate that it be attached to the grenadier's rifle for accountability purposes is ass. I know the Army would never have bought it otherwise, but HK should have made it incompatible with rifles for the user's sake.

It's an overpriced unergonomical malfunctioning piece of shit. Three times the cost of an M203 and worse in literally every single way.

Attached: lance-corporal-monjaral-from-the-13th-marine-expeditionary-units-mspf-maritime-9cb0f9.jpg (2030x1659, 1M)

t.

Attached: The Eternal DoD Shill.png (666x666, 240K)

Shorter barrel is better. It's lighter and handier and you only lose like ten feet per second compared to a 12" M203.

bump

>inb4 25 pound 30 inch rifle

i'll admit the only thing the m320 is lacking in is aesthetics.

>overpriced unergonomical malfunctioning piece of shit
How can I tell you never used one? fuck off neverserved.

Attached: bs-1_1.jpg (650x244, 17K)

>worse in literally every single way
Except being able to load longboi rounds. And having an easy standalone option.

Has anybody here ever actually used the longbois? They are a mythical unicorn. Why care about a feature for a round nobody uses?

Isn’t it dangerous when the barrel of the rifle is longer than the UGL?

I can be, if you're stupid.

I have personally witnessed somebody with an M16A2 & M203 combo fire from a supported sandbag while resting the *barrel of the rifle* on the sandbag. Result was round straight into the sandbag. Fortunately it was training and he had a chalk round loaded up, so all that happened was he ended up covered in powder like an idiot.

And that's why we put safe-arm distances on 40mm.