Flying wings

Post em

Attached: 1494873080753.jpg (1500x984, 520K)

Other urls found in this thread:

horten229.org
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horten_Ho_229
youtube.com/watch?v=VKGWETo6Sho
youtube.com/watch?v=RtNr9mb6CZI
youtube.com/watch?v=birTa1e_09U
youtube.com/watch?v=gXP-6jkdOD4
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_wing
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horten_Ho_229#Expert_Debunking_of_Stealth_Claims
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunne_D.8
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chyeranovskii_BICh-3
airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/horten-ho-229-v3?object=nasm_A19600324000
youtube.com/watch?v=uPU8dxUhkus
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Horten 299

First flying wing, yet powered, stealth and decades ahead of its time!

1944

horten229.org
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horten_Ho_229

some youtubes on the horten 229

youtube.com/watch?v=VKGWETo6Sho
youtube.com/watch?v=RtNr9mb6CZI
youtube.com/watch?v=birTa1e_09U
full documentation: youtube.com/watch?v=gXP-6jkdOD4

Attached: Horten-229.jpg (1852x975, 228K)

>First flying wing
nope en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_wing
>stealth
nope en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horten_Ho_229#Expert_Debunking_of_Stealth_Claims
>decades ahead of its time!
[citation needed]

What the fuck did you just fucking say to me, you little bitch?

Attached: Northrop_N-1M_flying_wing_demonstrator.jpg (1583x873, 156K)

>The German Horten Ho 229 of March 1944 was the world's first twin jet engine pure flying wing, and pre-production examples were test-flown during the closing stages of the war.

>>first twin jet engine pure flying wing
>>JET

Attached: HighFlight-DunneD5-7.jpg (1600x491, 153K)

Soviets had an earlier version of a tail-less, shaft engine aircraft

>>First flying wing, yet powered
>>'YET' powered
see:
Also the one you posted has a tail

>first jet powered flying wing
>hurr durr first flying wing guys!!!!!!!!!!

the fukk is that toy
it even has propeller n shiet

>>First flying wing, yet powered

...

Jack Northrop is rolling in his grave

Didn't know that that is an reaction engine.

The speed at which he's spinning in his grave from all these Horten fuckboys is astounding.

Soviets had something earlier, suck it teaboo

what are you even saying

Attached: 6b7.png (645x729, 32K)

Attached: (you).jpg (600x600, 52K)

>Also the one you posted has a tail
are naziboos seriously this retarded???
>The Dunne D.8 of 1912 was a tailless swept wing biplane, designed by J. W. Dunne to have inherent stability.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunne_D.8

Attached: Burgess-dunne_floatplane.jpg (800x541, 57K)

>Jack Northrop
>teaboo

post your Soviet flying wing nerd

Attached: 1502921444432.jpg (430x260, 30K)

Attached: Northrop-XB-35.jpg (1094x1500, 207K)

Attached: C8A63276-ECA5-4BFF-AB0C-EF4C408AA80D.jpg (1200x740, 172K)

Seems I was mistaken, it looked like it had a tail on some images.
Doesn't change the fact that the Horton was the world's first twin jet engine pure flying wing

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chyeranovskii_BICh-3
Keep your biplane teaboo

What do the jets have to do with anything?

The first post you retard
>>First flying wing, yet powered
>yeah nuh it wasn't the first xd
>*posts shaft engine aircraft*
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_wing

What the fuck are you talking about? If we're talking the N1M, then it's not fucking British. If we're talking the D.8, you must be severely retarded.

Attached: X-47B.jpg (1280x784, 78K)

Oh I see, you refuse to correct typos even in your fucking replies.

stay mad biplane teaboo

Ok start nitpicking like a little kid because I'm quoting somebody else

The word "yet" and "jet" have very different meanings.

You're grasping at straws now
Learn the difference between a shaft engine and reactionary engine

Attached: gay.png (506x94, 5K)

>Debunking
>Reimar Horten claimed that he wanted to add charcoal to the adhesive layers of the plywood skin of the production model to render it invisible to radar, because the charcoal “should diffuse radar beams, and make the aircraft invisible on radar”
>The Smithsonian has performed a technical study of the materials used and determined that there is "no evidence of carbon black or charcoal in the Horten jet"
The absolute state of Wikipedia, he said he WANTED to what implies that he didn't.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_wing
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horten_Ho_229#Expert_Debunking_of_Stealth_Claims
How about you read the sources you post, lmao

Attached: 1510856106342.png (594x544, 411K)

Not the same user.

I guess you're the one who needs to read.

here the remains of the stolen horten 229

airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/horten-ho-229-v3?object=nasm_A19600324000

Attached: A19600324000cp05.jpg (2000x1627, 1.04M)

>no u
kek

youtube.com/watch?v=uPU8dxUhkus

I WANT IT RESTORED NOW DAMMIT

FUCK SYMINGTON
FUCK CONVAIR

IT COULD HAVE BEEN GLORIOUS

Attached: YB49-9_300.jpg (2251x2771, 465K)