How would a war between China and the USA turn out?

How would a war between China and the USA turn out?

Attached: main_900.jpg (900x586, 480K)

Lousy for the chinese. Yet.

The Illuminati makes it drag on for years and the EU plays both sides like a chump. Kazuhira Miller comes in and begins playing a sad little fiddle as millions of people are sent off to die for plastic NERF guns.

We would win but at what cost? Our infrastructure and economy would be in shambles

The problem is that the communists at Wawa would do the swoosh penguin and interfere negatively with our plans.

US would become stronger than ever relying on its own material sourcing and labour

Attached: bigiron.jpg (522x522, 110K)

Chinese pyrrhic victory. 6 million people eaten.

Lol good luck with that. Americans are lazy as hell compared to the chinese and we would not have enough raw materials.

With American pigdogs lying defeat under the feet of the HAN BVLL

That's not how economics work

You do realize we have millions of tons of iron, coal and oil shale still in the ground.
Other that a few rare earth metal were pretty much resource independent for another 100 years.

Putting money in your own economy instead of shipping it abroad increases your own economy
>would not have enough raw materials
western countries got rare earth minerals too, there just aren't operational mines because of environmental laws

>putting money into your own economy
Money is made of paper, and in the modern economy mostly one's and zero's. And in exchange for money they gave you goods.

Large dimsim removal.

>oney is made of paper, and in the modern economy mostly one's and zero's
that is completely besides the point and irrelevant

No it’s not. Don’t criticize him because you have faith in an overall shitty plan that would never work. This country isn’t that great.

>No it’s not.
Yes it is, it doesn't what format the medium of exchange takes

Then you're saying chinas not gonna miss the lost income? GOOD! Much rather give it to americans instead

Retard

Why dont you just check out all the copy pasta shitpost rrplies you want to hear, in the last 50 threads you asked this, Pajeet?

What is the highest level of education you have achieved and what is your annual income?

In favour of India

I could be more relevant if I knew how economics works in your mind

No, but both sides are going to miss the loss of goods which each are better at making.

You’re dumb. Like really dumb. Did you even graduate from high school?

3.5 year academic degree and way more than you get for shilling here
>No, but both sides are going to miss the loss of goods which each are better at making.
what if WE DON'T WANT TO support a literal fucking dictatorship that has murdered over a hundred million of its own citizens?

Literally not an argument, you already lost

China exports worldwide. Lack of trade with the US is a non-problem for them.

I don’t offer factual counter arguments to retards because they won’t appreciate it anyway. If you want to face less ridicule, either read more or talk less.

Wtf is a 3.5 year degree? Are you saying you’ve been in an econ program for 3.5 years? If so, demand your tuition back, because you’re beneath the level of a highs high kid after 1 semester of AP micro econ.

Oh, I forgot to mention my annual compensation is north of 320k.

Major chinese defeat almost as bad as desert storm, they have the numbers and thats about it same as saddam. They havent proven themselves in war in recent memory and their infastucture, logistics supply and force projection are very weak. They dont have the tanks aircraft or warships in large enough quantities to stop the us navy and air force from steamrolling them in a few days. Their army is mostly for parades and show, they boast about it on the international stage to deter russian and indian aggression and shill it on a mongolian yurt sewing forum to attempt to intimidate the rest of the world but it doesnt work, that's how you get threads like this one.

Attached: Lt3+_432978140cc03546f47446985ef3f77b.jpg (250x200, 18K)

>compensation is north of 320k.
>literally can't craft an argument to save his life
>doesn't understand plain English either

Sure m8, and my dad works for Nintendo

>I don’t offer factual counter arguments
Because you don't have a single one or you'd have included it in your opening salvo

400 000 000 million chinese surrender and crash the us logistics, economy, food supply and chokes the continent itself while other chinese fight and the 400 000 000 do damage of their own

It would be a curbstomping. The Chinks are the least intimidating nation on earth. Anyone among them with a brain wouldn't risk their lives for a government that treats them like shit.

The leaders are probably not even aware of their deficiencies because of Chink cultural issues like not questioning superiors, interethnic animosity, a national insecurity complex, etc.

>typical communist trash lying his face off
>still manages to start his message by admitting he doesn't do 'factual arguments'

You don’t have to feed dead men.

Attached: 9355C465-B6CE-43BB-A3B3-7307982A2C22.jpg (427x430, 46K)

history is always repeated. the Xi dynasty fall down, US, Europe and Russki put straws on Chinese slaves. just like the end of Ching dynasty

Only facts you retards need to know is your acute lack of mental acuity. Enjoy your retardation, and poverty.

I’ve offered to play the w2 game on here, but nobody wants to take me on. It’s ok though. If thinking everyone here lives in abject poverty like you makes you feel better, I ain’t gonna stop you.

Let’s see that collection then m8

>Having to shill this hard or your government disappears you and your family
I feel you for you man but you're still making your country and people look bad by spouting shit

What collection? My gun collection?

>what if we don't want a literal dictatorship murdering millions
Then we would be turning our backs on half a century of foreign policy

But how would stopping trade with them help? By inciting a vastly violent uprising where tens of millions die? Or just by impoverishing them and hoping antagonistic action helps reduce the support for dictatorial nationalism? What we've failed to learn since Vietnam is that politicial change comes from within. Forcing an alien ideology on people at gunpoint doesn't work.

No your Chinese knock off mimi dolls. Yes your guns you retarded faggot

well, here's about...half. Now show me yours.

Oh, btw, I'm not Chinese.

Attached: I have no guns.jpg (2823x1713, 1.36M)

>But how would stopping trade with them help?
The money used to buy cancer causing shitty toxic plastics and cancer drywalls would be spent on better quality items leading to increase in profits by american businesses and workers wallets and increase in quality of life for not being poisoned

>would be spent on better quality items leading to increase in profits by american businesses and workers wallets
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
this level of retardation is simply extraordinary

Only china ships toxic drywall, China is poison

so are you saying that
1) All drywall from China are toxic
and
2) Nobody else makes toxic dry walls
and
3) Dry walls constitute the entirety of Chinese imports in the US?

You probably shouldn't open your mouth so much if all you're going to spout is retarded shit like this.

Now you're literally making shit up and putting words in peoples mouths

You fucking lost

Only china poisons people and mislabels things to the degree they do

ONLY CHINA HAS HAD TO EXECUTE PEOPLE FOR TOXIC FAKE MILK AND EVEN THAT WASN'T ENOUGH TO STOP IT

CHINA IS A SHITHOLE

yawnnn. Room temp IQ retards really need to know their place. Come at me when you stop foaming at the mouth and can form a coherent argument against Sino-American bilateral trade.

Don't worry. I'm a patient man.

>a coherent argument against Sino-American bilateral trade
would benefit americans financially and healthwise, only people losing out would be chinese

Implessive

>lies to peoples faces about what they just said
>calls people stupid when lies are pointed out
communist

>only people losing out would be chinese
Sorry, try again.
I really hope you were joking about the 3.5 years in an econ program. Do you know the difference between GNP and GDP?

Literacy. You need some. Or at least get your IQ to 90. Your demonstrated level of intelligence is pretty embarrassing.

>the 3.5 years in an econ program
again, literally making shit up, putting words in other peoples mouth

typical communist

You're literally hearing(reading) things people are not saying(writing), you're either a communist shill or genuinely mentally ill

You’ll have to excuse me. All you retards sound alike. But what did I tell you about foaming at the mouth? Stop it.

You're literally making shit up, no one in the thread claimed to have been 3.5 years in any econ studies

Literally all in your head commie

My prognosis for you is to repeat 4th grade and stay off Jow Forums. Your retardation is very close to terminal.

Wrong date, moron. We're definitely not going to believe you now. Definitely making shit up.

>making shit up
>calling people stupid when people call you out on it
Literally no one in the thread has claimed to have done 3.5 years in econ studies

Like I said: literacy.
See Give your parents my condolences. It must be hard on them to bring such an extraordinary retard into this world.

IT WOULD BE A SHAME IS SOMEONE FORCED YOU TO FORGIVE ALL THAT DEBT

Attached: 15676514_10154329248359436_967645291575024015_o.jpg (1038x576, 86K)

That 3.5 isn't econ studies and the message you linked doesn't claim so

Its an european bachelors degree in information technology and processing

Yawnnn. Denying your poverty won’t make it go away.

So you have even less business talking about this topic? Wow. Why do the uneducated tend to proselytize the loudest?

Not how it works. Clearly you’ve never heard of the secondary fixed income market.

>making shit up
>calls others stupid when its pointed out

Also economics is bullshit, an economist doesn't have to create anything that has functional logic, their ideas never get tested, computer programmers understand working systems better

>Kazuhira Miller comes in and begins playing a sad little fiddle as millions of people are sent off to die for plastic NERF guns.
Atleas we get to taste those magnificent burgers.

Give a current time stamp, poorfag larping with someone else’s collection

>Also economics is bullshit, an economist doesn't have to create anything that has functional logic
Ooookkkkkkk. Wipe that foam away boi.

Will you return the courtesy if I do? I’m more than willing if you provide a timestamped picture of your....”collection”.

Economics is right up there with gender studies in terms of validation

America would be all HOOHAA!, while china would be all WAAAAAH! Would make a great movie if they got the right director.

Unironically this

Micro is a science, macro is a religion, and you’re not qualified to make statements about either.

Mathematician/programmer/engineer > economics "expert"

>literally more than two thirds of curriculum literally same as straight up engineer
>not qualified to give opinion

Must be why the federal reserve is full of people who aren’t economists , heh? Must be why the ECB is staffed by IT monkeys, no? Oh wait.

Sorry boi, you lack the prerequisites to have this discussion with me. But just for fun, let me disclose something about myself. My first undergrad (really first of 2, I double majored) was a BS-EE with an emphasis on MEMS.

Photoshopped picture. Those aren't your guns, nice try though.

Attached: shooped.png (603x735, 1.03M)

What kind of shitty school did you go to?

still not an argument

whatever lets you sleep at night, buddy.

Attached: LOL_PHOTOSHOP.jpg (2628x1948, 1.49M)

still a retard. Sorry, if you want me to take you seriously, you have to demonstrate a certain level of brain activity.

>Must be why the ECB is staffed by IT monkeys, no? Oh wait.
This one is actually ran by politicians and has so far caused tens of millions of european youth to be unemployed, not really a good example on your part

Literally not an argument

>literally more than two thirds of curriculum literally same as straight up engineer
>literally
I'm sure you're using that term wrong, because outside of stats and math, there is very little core overlap between the two.

I'm afraid to say that it's fairly obviously most of you have no idea on what you're talking about.

I hope both succeed in wiping themselves out.

>I'm sure you're using that term wrong
The lectures and classes were mixed with engineering students so I am pretty fucking sure I was not imagining things

Again photoshopped. How fucking shameless are you?

Attached: shooped again.png (605x905, 1.23M)

Literally not worth my time.

You can argue ECB's mandate is a bit different from that of the US Federal Reserve, but Draghi's PhD is from MIT in Econ, and if memory serves, the majority of the council are econ degree holders.

with this much denial, you must be sleeping well at night.

This. Check out how the last major war came out for the US. After WW2 way into the 60s we were the absolute global powerhouse of economy.
China on the other hand would get curbstomped, would lose it's cheap production capability real quick and with a little luck would also get sucker punched by the russians who still hate them

The only denial is yours, denying you photoshopped "your" pics.

>The lectures and classes were mixed with engineering students
I don't know how it works in Europe, but there is no significant overlap in course load between an Econ major and, say, an CE or CS major in the US.

And it's fairly obvious given your previous statements that your background in economics is rather lacking.

Great job not posting the other half of your collection with the same wrong time stamp, noguns larper.

>After WW2 way into the 60s we were the absolute global powerhouse of economy.
that's because you had no industrial competition and western europe was your dumping ground. America was feeding the GLOBAL demand at that time.