Why the fuck are firearms owners the most autistic consumers of any product...

Why the fuck are firearms owners the most autistic consumers of any product? All Jow Forums does is shit on "le nusig" now because they released ONE (1) lemon of a pistol and ONE (1) pistol with an easily corrected flaw.

Exactly how the fuck does this affect the quality of the P226, P938, P250, MPX, MCX, etc?

Attached: 1532589506935.jpg (590x767, 127K)

Gun owners most autistic. Yeah no try getting into ham radio. Or airplanes

Train sets. Swords. Comic books.

nigger have you been to Jow Forums?
>>Jow Forums

shut up dont laugh

>ham radio
glad to see another autistic ham

That's 2 more problems than their competition. Also guns need to work as specified everytime lest one of the times it doesnt kills somebody.
>autistic
Is valueing your life autistic? Fuck sig.

>this user has never been to /a/ Jow Forums or /tg/

Attached: 1523303754798.jpg (480x451, 57K)

>Why does this widespread hobby/interest have people that are autsitic about it?
People respect gun autism 1000X more than video game or role playing autism

Because firearms malfunctions tend to get people hurt or killed.

>Exactly how the fuck does this affect the quality of the P226, P938, P250, MPX, MCX, etc?
because the sig 556 is incompetently designed and has the wrong furniture.
SIG-usa isn't evil and anti-civilian like HK is, they're just incompetent.

Oh hey there's two of you here? Been a ham since I was 13 (my father was serious into it, like go a variance on our property to build a 80ft tower into it).

Sig has been considered shit since they stopped being German made. Otherwise they might be right up there with HK today

It's not autism
The hobby is full of pessimists and realists. We're all still reeling from the rape of Remington.
There's no room for error with a device you would trust your life too. Also, like said, this is not like the other topics covered by more popular boards in the same category like /co/ or /tv/. It's somewhat separated from things like taste and opinions and it entails a lot more responsibility in it's enjoyment and employment.

Because Sig Sauer was bought out by Cerberus/Freedom Group. A conglomerate of New York Jews who buy tottering but formerly glorious companies and drive them into the ground. Shorting stock the whole way down.

They are literally parasites. And now they own Sig Sauer.

Or hi fi audio. And vinyl.

>Why the fuck are firearms owners the most autistic consumers of any product?
Never been to /tg/ I see.

>interests board
>but with heavy material investment
>and lore
>and rulebooks
>and plenty of history
Checks out

SIG is owned by Onex you fucking mong.

OP isn't familiar with /O/ autism.
> X brand is unreliable because my dad's friend's uncle's cat's owner's one broke after he didn't do any oil changes for 5 years.
> X engine/transmission is weak because it blows up if you tune it to 1000+ HP and track it every weekend while DDing it on 87 octane.
> X car is too slow because Y car is .00001 second faster around the HurrDuurrr Ring in Germany when driven by someone with more skill/talent than anyone here will ever have.
> I need a 5 foot lift on my F350 to navigate the gravel driveway at my mom's house even though she can handle it just fine in her Civic.
> I want to get into bikes but if itdoesn't have at least 1000cc and can't do 200mph it's not cool enough and people will think I'm a fag.
> I want a bike/car/offroader that's way too expensive and that I have nowhere near enough skill to use without killing myself so that I can grow into it.
> Why are X cars so expensive? (People link tons of cars like it that are cheap as fuck) all of those are gay/not under $500.
> Why did you buy car X? I have car Y and can't imagine why anyone would ever make a different choice or have different priorities/preferences than I do.
> Car X isn't good unless it's modded but everyone who mods cars just ruins them.

Oh and also my favorite which you will see everywhere including Jow Forums.

> My situation is X.
> I want to acquire Y even though that's completely impractical for X.
> Should I?
> Almost everyone posts that they shouldn't for numerous obvious reasons and offers far more practical alternatives.
> OP spergs out and defends Y, calls everyone fags.
> OP isn't actually asking a question, but stating that they want Y for X and seeking validation because they know it's a bad idea.

The P320's issue was so incredibly specific that it took nearly 3 and a half years for it to be discovered and was easily corrected. It's still a wholly reliable gun that wouldn't malfunction in such a way that would ever likely put your safety and wellbeing at risk.

That leaves the P365, which is undeniably and inexcusably shit. That's a single gun and none of the issues found in that gun translate over to the rest of their line, you're a fucking moron if you wouldn't trust a p226 to be reliable when it needs to be because the p365 is a piece of shit. It's akin to not wanting an F150 because the Pinto was garbage or an M&P because some of the revolvers have Hillary holes.