Per Sig Sauer, the P365 has the lowest bore axis ratio of any handgun currently made

> Per Sig Sauer, the P365 has the lowest bore axis ratio of any handgun currently made.

Does SIG ever stop lying? That's a fucking XDS of all things on the right. If anything, the P365 has the highest bore axis of any single-stack 9mm striker-fired pistol.

Attached: 20180816_151155.jpg (4000x3000, 2.44M)

Source faggit

Why do you fags worry about shit like bore axis. It doesn't affect my shooting ability and if you're really so weak you can't shoot a 9mm because it had a higher bore axis than another pistol you need to stop lying to people and actually go shoot

*Teleports behind you*
Nothing personnel, kid...

Attached: prodotti_immagini_immagine_526.jpg (531x371, 23K)

Slide height and bore axis are not the same thing.

It's on Wikipedia for some reason without an actual source. Just says "Live Broadcast from the Shot Show 2018" in brackets. Which live broadcast? Sig did a ton of them at SHOT.

Attached: 1534447543140.jpg (158x200, 23K)

>the P365 has the lowest bore axis ratio
>"""ratio"""

There's the issue.

XD is a cheap Glock copy.

*inhales*

I know, I measured it too. That pic was just easier to show.

Measured from the highest point in the grip to the center of the bore

>P365 1.37"
>XDS 1.27"

I'm not so much worried so much as I am sick of SIG's lying bullshit. Between lying about the P320 being safe and hiding that they fixed the military version, lying about this in the P365 marketing, lying about the number of P365s that were having broken firing pins, etc. they need to get their shit together.

Also in guns this small and light bore axis makes a noticeable difference. The P365 has far more muzzle rise than say a G43 and makes it harder to control in rapid fire.

I don't remember exactly which video but I think it was a SIG broadcast, not an interview with someone else. Phil Strader said it during a demo on the range.

>bore axis ratio
What does that even mean?

Quality front sight post.

Less is less, more is more.

>claim sig lies
>post picture compairing the back of the slide

Haven't seen this one. Thanks for the chuckle

>be user
>ignore natural correlation between bore axis and slide height

You're right, SIG must have just put a giant slide with the barrel sitting really low in it for no reason.

oh wait no

Attached: 20180816_154242.jpg (3475x2775, 1.56M)

>Hudson h9

well i just made it so not surprised you haven't seen it lol

Nigger have you ever fired a handgun? Go fire a Glock 17 and P226 side by side and tell me there's no difference.

So true hahaha. Sig's are trash.

>the lowest bore axis ratio of any handgun currently made.

Attached: s14763_grande.jpg (480x360, 29K)

Your pictures show the Sig frame is larger, not that the slide is.

Nope vector

Attached: KRISS-PSB-6.jpg (2000x1335, 142K)

I made the mistake of firing a 9mm Vector carbine at the range last weekend and now I really want one. Goddamn are they comfortable, both just holding one and shooting it. You'd never guess by looking at one. Also it's really cool how you can feel the muzzle go up and then force itself back down. Definitely a unique recoil impulse there.

From your picture it seems like you don't know what bore axis is.

Also when did Sig say that?

But you're not showing the bore axis and also only idiots think bore axis matters.

That's no longer being made.

That's not a handgun.

Attached: steyr_l9_a1_trapezoid_sight_re.jpg (600x265, 16K)

y'all niggers skipped over

Isn't that the H9's claim to fame?

Attached: very expensive full steel 9mm.jpg (768x724, 82K)

Ok idiot, show that picture with the XD next to it. Not that bore axis really matters but you don't seem to even know what you're mad about.

Attached: Shadow2BandBWeb2.png (1070x713, 234K)

I own a USP40, and a G17. I have faster follow ups with my USP because i have shot it more, and I have nicer sights on it.

BOARAXES don't mean shit.