What if all the original founding fathers some how came back to life

The founding fathers would be appalled by the state of modern America, as we should all be.

Attached: 1533580581445.jpg (260x283, 6K)

This. Transporting people +100 years into the future anytime past 1900 would probably cause most people to go into shock and die soon after.

Why did Americans let so many mexicans in and so many niggers free?
How could they knowingly let that happen?

Well, they also lead a rebellion, but it was just the first in quite a few economic rebellions that the founding fathers quashed. They didn't give a shit about their countrymen.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shays'_Rebellion#Rebellion

4th paragraph of the background. The US government paid shit, then wanted taxes from the men who fought for their nation.

Not what I was taught, but if the Brits had just executed the Founding Fathers, the American Colonies would probably still be in the Commonwealth.

They'd probably think "eh whatever I'm dead but at least my face is on their money"

>what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms. the remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. what signify a few lives lost in a century or two? the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. it is it’s natural manure.
We know, atleast where Jefferson stand.

>American Colonies would probably still be in the Commonwealth
Yeah fuck that. Stay jealous, limeys

Benny Frank would do coke nonstop and fuck french whores

If the British could have executed the founding fathers they would have.

It's just that British attempts to create a police state caused a full scale armed insurrection.

Revisionist history from Marxist faggots who are terrified at the idea of America having heroes outside the Civil Rights Movement.

Malcolm X is my nigga. King was a busta.

The Brit Elites have never stopped w/their police state BS, they re-invaded the US and now they imprison any white Brit that speaks the truth. They have kicked-out Americans as well as imposed their Police State Globalist will in their 'former' colonies-human rights mean nothing to these rats. The Crown and it's Globalist allies must be destroyed.

Outside the BLACK Civil Rights movement, even though the Revolution and the Civil War were ALL about human rights

PS It was the Crown that instigated the slave revolt against the French in Hati, a massive slaughter of whites followed by a brutal subjugation (by the Crown) leaving the Brits in control of Haiti and 1000s of Blk slaves that were "free" so the Crown did not even have to feed them, the result is today's Haiti; average IQ of 60

the fathers would be divided as well

washington, adams and hamilton we're federalist af and believed in centralized government holding the leash to keep everyone else in check

Jefferson and madison would probably be the only "our guy" in the group, wanting small government and give the eternal jew a big fuck you to their endgame debt slavery scheme. but would probably be labeled hipster anarchists by todays political spectrum

all i have to say is thank god for jefferson and his love for individuality and freedoms, had a boot licker like hamilton or adams been at the helm we would have replaced one monarch with another

Washington is neutral hes a military guy not a politician but would lean big govt with republican ideals of today

Garvey, Malcolm X and Muhammed Ali understood that we need racial separatism. Those are great niggers, none of that utopian King nonsense.

People forget that the founding fathers wrote on paper that america was for white people of good character

Attached: 1535050419187.jpg (960x716, 207K)

Depends on which ones.

Some of them were genuinely pretty based, others only wanted property-holding ultra-wealthy elites to have any rights at all.

Washington chopped up a few British soldiers with his ax, would you like to hang out with him, maybe get drunk, tell scary stories by the fireside?

Attached: 1520764409632.jpg (541x480, 20K)

How would segregation work in jobs? Or do you give them one state for them to live and work in

Attached: 1527807246941.png (485x443, 22K)

>what is a border

Jeffersonian Anarchism, baby. Gimme that political party.

We have the black folks do all sports and dance entertainment

>Why did Americans let so many mexicans in

Somebody had to do the work Americans didn't want to. Not wanting to do their own agriculture seems to be a re-occuring theme in US history.

zfg. would shoot commies with a good company.

holocaust but this time a real one

Attached: father land.png (1240x1870, 3.48M)

You say that like it's a bad thing. Yet you have no problem with niggers in south Africa saying blacks only

You can only be a nigga if your American.
As a white SA what they call them cause it ain't nigga

Ben Franklin would probably slay pussy like he did in France, desu.

Picture a man with a large nose and crooked teeth gleefully rubbing his hands together.

>Yet you have no problem with niggers in south Africa saying blacks only
What if I do disagree with that?

How is buying land unconstitutional?

It means you're a disabled nigger loving soi goi and should go fucking kill yourself by choking on nigger dick you pathetic beta male.

Attached: 1513395371811.jpg (377x325, 35K)

>ignorant of history

Attached: mint-two-faced18.jpg (550x425, 168K)

What is Liberia?

Thats a beautiful picture.

The constitution never actually says the government or executive has the power to buy land. People made the argument that it is covered by the necessary and proper clause but Jefferson didn't buy that argument, but bought the land anyways. Point is he did some he believed was unconstitutional for what he considered the greater good.

>"it is the case of a guardian, investing the money of his ward in purchasing an important adjacent territory; & saying to him when of age, I did this for your good"

Just say jews.

"Darkies, get back to the fields."

Attached: 1522314112928.jpg (650x2018, 414K)

"Revolutions are a spectator sport. The majority will sit in the stands and watch the factions fight. At the end they will choose side with the team that is winning." - George Lincoln Rockwell
Although I know little about the American war of independence (as I am not American), it is historically fairly common for the amount of "Active participants" to always be fairly low. It makes sense as it takes great devotion to throw away your life (with tough odds, a high chance of death, capture or the loss of your livelihood and wealth) and fight for the underdog, something that most normal people are not willing to do.

If/when I get pulled over again I'm gonna use that as an argument
>OFFICER WHERE EXACTLY IN THE CONSTITUTION DOES IT MENTION SPEED LIMITS???? AM I BEING DETAINED???

Sam Adams violently suppressed a riot against British-style taxes on whiskey.

>this meme picture again
What shitty statistics manipulation.

Attached: a7fa7152aa533488ce2f45493a71180c2d71bd2e869884118089b4002072e7a4.jpg (1506x552, 224K)

Yeah of course,

Fucking retard

considering washington freed his slaves when he was legally allowed to in virginia and jefferson wasn't allowed to but attempted to abolish slavery numerous times at the state and federal level (coming only 1 vote short of abolishing it at the federal level) i doubt they'd really have that much of a problem with it. don't know about mexicans though

can only imagine what jackson would do yikes lol

>british-style tax
>implemented from state-elected officials
nice history 101 faggot.

Not believing in slavery isn't the same thing as being okay with your country being filled with niggers.

true, still there's a huge difference between niggers and blacks. just as there is between wiggers and white trash and whites, cholos and hispanics, et hoc genus omne and yeah i bet washington'd grind the fuck out of his composite dentures with the amount of degenerate morons about

The side that wins

And if Lincoln had his way they would have all gone back to Africa.

>couldn’t be our own retardation
>had to be le Jew
Good thinking goy

someone's mad about getting ANGLO'd

Attached: 1523023246471.png (824x542, 35K)

What about Andrew 'Fuck You' Jackson? Does he make the cutoff for the list?

Pretty sure the Texicans would have opted to shoot every border-hopper on sight, it was the industrialists that liked wage-suppressing power of imported wage-slaves. Only in recent era has agriculture become so villified by the 'educated'.

whether jefferson saw it as constitutional or otherwise is really academic. The house and senate went along to provide funding for it. It was 3cents an acre. What nation would pass up the opportunity to double its size with the swipe of a pen? We likely would have come into conflict with france or spain or whoever owned it at some point as americans spread westward anyway. It wasnt just a good deal for us, it likely averted conflict with european powers in north america.

I think people sort of undersell the strategic significance of controlling the Mississippi as well. Any nation that could control new orleans could launch a back door invasion. It was an existential threat to every southern state. The purchase might not make any sense constitutionally, but once you look at the strategic implications it becomes imperative.

>it was the industrialists

its the porous border with mexico. Any farmer that can hire mexicans to work for half of what an american would could undercut the competition. If you dont hire illegals you cant even keep your head above water. It doesnt have to have anything to do with industrialists, its just simple market economics. The only way to end this dichotomy is to seal the border, which until recently no one has been willing to do.

Yes industrialists, They pushed out any small operations with undercutting and then scooping up the opened land. They were also the ones that lobbied to cutting back the immigration limits that were in place upto the 50's
Those same moguls love advocating for open borders for cheap workers they can get kicked out on a whim. If food values weren't artificially suppressed with subsidies farms -would- have enough money to pay competitive wages/benefits, but why would you when you can pay under the table?
It's not 'simple economics' when it's driven fuckery. The Wall won't do anything, re-implementing a tighter immigration policy and expeditious deportation is whats needed. Also there's a simple fact that prices of food will also need to rise in order to allow farmers to get enough farm hands so subsidies would need to be rolled back.

>t. Shartblue

They'd probably die from all the faggotry.

>GLR
Based and redpilled.