Are these types of vehicles invulnerable to small arms fire or do they just look tuff?
Are these types of vehicles invulnerable to small arms fire or do they just look tuff?
>rpg fits into small arms
You could just use wikipedia and look under that section labeled armor, but that's too hard isn't it?
LAV-25 base model has jack shit for protection and only really protects up to mid size rifle cartridges. Same goes for most shit in that role. Russian stuff like the btr-90 and bmp3 are like paper when dealing with something stronger than 7.62x51
Sorry, I meant firearms.
they are deisgned to resist up to .30cal on all sides, because 7.62x51 or similiar is the most likely threat they will face
.50cal will go right through and so will RPGs, but if they encounter resistance that stiff they will just run, its not their job to fight
>Russian stuff like the btr-90 and bmp3 are like paper when dealing with something stronger than 7.62x51
But bmp 3 without era package can hold 30mm frontally and AP 12.7 all around
I mean they gotta fare better than a Humvee when encountering IEDs tho right
Not the base model, you need armor panels for 50 bmg all around.
Base model exactly
You need armor panels and era package to protect it against AT launchers
I always wondered if a PTRD would work on AFVs and IFVs
>40mm
yes
Nope, you need additional add on armor to get 50bmg protection.
No you don't
12.7 protection is included in base model
I wonder if xm193 would go through it? Velocity and whatnot.
Absolutely not, and if you think that your pic related is the base model you are dumb as a rock.
Kill yourself retard it's literally written in specs on official site that it has all around except rear 12.7 mm protection AND with additional pack on my pic it's protected against AT launchers and low velocity heat rounds
Nope, not the Bmp-3. If it were true you would have posted the link.
The LAV-25A2s have an armor kit that provides protection from 14.5mm HMGs and has an anti-spall liner
>0313 here
Ohohohoho boi. Don’t get me started. A .50 will chew an LAV up quick. Even a 7.62 AP MG will make quick work of an LAV. Especially without up-armor
if 50 LAV-25s zerg rushed a MBT would they be able to win?
Not really. It’s easier to get out of a burning humvee than an aluminum coffin
Yes. Few casualties, but a concentration of dumping all ammo on the tracks and weak spots, concussively killing the crew and disabling the vehicle long enough to call for fire
Checked tank encyclopedia for you two.
> Protection against 30 mm gun rounds at about 200 m is assured at the front, machine gun rounds elsewhere. [...] The standard weight of the vehicle is 18.7 tonnes but reaches 22.2 tonnes with all the add-on armor panels mounted. Equipped with such a kit, the vehicle is immune to 12.7 mm machine gun rounds at a range of 100–200 m.
So it can beat 30mm at front but needs package for .50 all around.
Not realistic though. Our role is reconnaissance. We’d drop a warhead on his forehead before he could pick up our mufflers heat dig or hear our T-case commiting suicide
>Лoбoвaя бpoня выдepживaeт пoпaдaния cнapядoв кaлибpoм 30 мм c диcтaнции 200 мeтpoв. Кpышa и бopтa выдepживaют пyлю Б-32 кaлибpoм 12,7 мм c диcтaнции 100—200 мeтpoв. Пpи ycтaнoвлeнных мoдyлях нaклaднoй бpoни c yчётoм мoдyлeй и динaмичecкoй зaщиты мacca вoзpacтaeт дo 22,7 тoнны
Why the cyrillic user? Pretty sure vatnik can read english.
sit down cousin, yoo cannot fight someone with 50 cal
My bad I was thinking the BRDM BMP and BTR all had similar thicknesses. Was too lazy to look through the bmp3 specs again to make sure. I just remembered vatniks had some wacky ideas about what actually protects troops.
AC is optional on the btr-90 tho
They're more for wheeling bois around rather than taking shots.
I'd not trust them to be able to take AP rifle rounds from all sides.
>Russian stuff like the btr-90 and bmp3 are like paper when dealing with something stronger than 7.62x51
As is the Stryker
We found Ivan
Hes right tho.