*Dragon lady

Just how capable is she?

Attached: 1051520681.jpg (2694x1794, 374K)

*proceeds to get shot down by an F-22 over the horizon because the Communist Chinese lied and it isn't really stealth*

Attached: f22raptor.jpg (1486x1115, 100K)

Attached: short.png (2694x1794, 3.55M)

Definitely worse than western ones, but nobody really knows how much.

The lack of a control surfaces is disturbing.

Attached: T-50 tail.webm (640x480, 507K)

Superbly capable. It has real time better stealth than the Americans. The F-22 has better stealth only if it is pointing its nose towards the target. Which means a static target, best case is a weather balloon. While the J-20 has better stealth in angles. Not to mention the J-20 has better radar and missiles. Internet experts have even nicknamed the air to air ballistic missile as SHARM, super HARM. Truly impressive.

2 yuan has been deposited in your bank account

>J-20 better stealth
nigger the ailerons aren't even aligned with the wing, that's RCS city. Daily reminder that the chinese are only aping stealth technology based on looks, at best they're 4++ gen in stealth

Yeah but China has QUANTUM something!

I don't know what ailorons are but I do know that it has S-Duct and that just screams stealth. I doubt America knows more about stealth than China. Since China has already improved upon the base American knowldege about stealth when Israel gave blueprints to China.

F-22 all aspect rcs is the number they quote when theyre saying "it has the rcs of a fly"
The j-20 is laughably unstealthy for a "stealth" fighter. They missed basic stiff like all the edge angles, not to mention the fusalage. That thing lights up like a Christmas tree no wonder we haven't seen any of them bugging our recon planes over the South China sea

>I don't know what ailerons are

副翼

>Implying China improves the designs they steal

Okay Cheng, how can a jet be stealth if it's screaming, huh?

Attached: 1521064164080.png (883x318, 244K)

>Literally made in China

Didn't Putin asked Krauts to fund the project because they need new jets?

Excuse me, but this is the real Dragon Lady.

Attached: 160811-axe-u2-cold-war-tease_huuaqi.jpg (1480x833, 130K)

june 4th Tiananmen Square massacre 天安门广场大屠杀

VERY SUPER CHINA HOW CAN AMERICA F22 AND AMERICAS GREATEST BRO INDIA WITH TEJAS COMPETE! WHITEYS BTFO! LOLOL HYPER QUANTUM (QUANTUM IS WITCHCRAFT LIKE TOILET xDDDDD) STEALTH!!

t.legit Chinese shill

"The optimum location of a canard is on someone else's airplane"

>canards
not much

>nigger the ailerons aren't even aligned with the wing
Nigger your eyes arent properly alligned with your head.

Unless you are talking about the tilted actuators for the ailerons which means you are retarded and dont know what you are talking about, because it hardly matters to "stealthyness" how you turn those bumps, at least not on this level of discussion.

A daily reminder how faggots that dont belong to Jow Forums keep trying to talk politicized shit about an aircraft parotting some buzzwords and butthurt shit they read on posts and blogs but fail to determine characteristics you can even visibly confirm.

Based censorship DDOSer

IMPLESSIVE

Attached: 1516236700961.jpg (1080x1086, 100K)

Post real dragon ladies next time

I look at the J-20 as basically being a long-range anti ship missile truck. It's got a lot of internal fuel storage, so that it can conduct long range patrols, detect enemy ships, and fire from the maximum distance possible? Is this an accurate assessment?

The other plane I'd like to learn more about is the J-31. Do they have any non-Chinese buyers lined up for it?

That's not a U-2.

>all aspect
Lol no it's frontal RCS.

As capable as US airframes? no.
Capable enough to threaten to dominate the SE Asian airspace compared to the planes used by most of the other nations in the region? Yes, probably.

Capable of causing damage in a conflict? Probably.
Capable of causing as much damage as a US aircraft? Probably not.

its not a binary black/white. The US jets arent the nadir of aircraft design and the Chinese as much use as a Wright Flyer. What percentage its flight envelope is compared to its equivalents is debatable. 99% as good? 95? 90? Even at 1/2 of the capability, its still capable of performing a lot of stuff. Only a fool would dismiss it entirely, just because it is Chinese. Underestimating a threat is the surest way to end up killed.

I also have something. May be not QUANTUM, but hey. At least it's something!

The Chinese have made a business out of this. They sell their equipment to less wealthy, less developed nations, at a significantly lower cost than western manufacturers. So maybe they only get 75% of the performance, but for 50% of the cost that's not a bad trade off at all.

Stop responding to trolls! 98% of vatnik and impressive posters are fuckin trolls (the 2% is armatard which you shouldn't respond to either.).

Not unlike what the Soviets did during the Cold War.

Well without Russian built engines she's useless
if we kick out all the cold war retard boomers in government and the (((dual citizens))) of our "greatest allied nation" we could start a really good alliance with Russia and then China would be kill

Attached: 1482112705040.jpg (1480x1201, 190K)

more like because the canards make it have a laughable RCS.

The J-20 is a little confusing in specs, its 2m longer than the F22 but about the same weight empty. It has around 20% more fuel but inferior engines might negate some of the advantage. Internal weapon bays aren't all that large and it doesn't appear to carry external weapons. It's probably just an ASF to hunt bombers and air refueling tankers.

Good recon aircraft

Attached: u2one.jpg (2048x1329, 141K)

>then the F 22 melts in a light shower and both sides declare it a victory

The J 31 hasn't even entered mass production yet. But if there are, the only people who routinely buy Chinese arms are Pakistan and a handful of broken Southeast Asian and African nation.