Why didn't other armies use a larger magazine for their bolt-action rifles...

Why didn't other armies use a larger magazine for their bolt-action rifles? Surely it's great having 10 rounds instead of 5.

Attached: really makes me thinkle.jpg (1200x600, 72K)

Other urls found in this thread:

rockislandauction.com/detail/59/367/danzig-gew-98
anyforums.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Because you then have to re-load that 10-round magazine. If you're using a charger-loading system that means you need a 10-round packet of cartridges (like a stripper clip or en-bloc) that will stay together outside the rifle. Even the Brits stuck to using 5-round chargers.

Attached: Commercial_Mauser_98_military_rifle_with_10-round_extended_magazine.jpg (3500x2613, 2.7M)

Magazine technology wasn't up to it.
Rimmed rounds hate double stack mags so the magazine would be really long single stack and would be obstructive in prone. (It would be the length of a 20 round double stack mag)
You could say 'why not just have the mags be fully detachable' and the answer would be the same, Just look at all the problems with box magazine fed firearms of WW1- Early WW2.
Ppssibly also thought clips were fast enough, and that you didn't need more than 5-6 rounds.

Attached: 1948 Print .380 ACP CZ 9 mm Short Special Strakonice Pistol Interior View PR3.jpg (1000x713, 77K)

So then why didn't other armies use 10 round mag's and issue 5 round stripper clips/en-bloc clips?

It takes the same amount of time to shoot five reload and shoot five as it does to shoot ten then reload ten. Not much practical benefit with a bolt action.

The only advantage the 10-round magazine has is when shooting starts. Once you have to re-load it's the same time whether you load 5 into a 5rd magazine or load 5 into a 10rd magazine.

Attached: Mausers_Model_1893_Gew98_and_Model_1893-95_with_10-round_magazine.jpg (3239x2381, 1.5M)

Enfield mags were double stack.
Rimmed cartridge is meaningless if the rifle and mag were properly designed.

Maybe a little faster 10 rounds than with two reloads.
But so minor that there is not huge advantage.

Why did Dragunov allegedly have such a difficult time developing a reliable magazine for the SVD when the Brits had already mastered rimmed cartridges in a double stack magazine with the Lee-Enfield? Does it simply have to do with the differences in geometry between .303 and 7.62x54R?

Cartridges play a part too.
Certain cartridges are easier to get rimlocked with lee-enfield.

it was a really big cost, and would require re-tooling factories and probably a new design

the germans in particular didnt upgrade much because the gun was already sufficient for its purpose of supporting and protecting an MG42, the main offensive punch

they would rather build more MG42s then spend more time upgrading an already perfectly fine rifle

The SVD is also an autoloader and the Lee-Enfield rifles aren't. You can have more leeway when the system isn't moving faster than most people can see.

Nice pic

That's a pretty big advantage though, give the riflemen double the firepower with which to control the initial reaction to the firefight and suppression before needing to stop and reload. Which is a critical time.

Protruding magazines are more prone to damage than flush ones.

You weren't supposed to outlive 5 shots anyway.

>Ivan gets 91/30 and 1 stripper clip of 54r
>Ivan loads rifle
>Ivan runs in
>Ivan dies
>Ivan drops garbage rod on snowy ground.

In addition to the concerns other anons have mentioned, 19th-early 20th century military strategists were concerned that enlisted men would 'waste ammo' if you gave them fast firing or high-capacity rifles. They were afraid that the infantryman would rapidly shoot all the rounds he had, fail to conserve his shots, and quickly be completely out of ammo

If his rounds were especially dear due to low-capacity or low rates of fire, it was thought the infantryman would make each shot count.

Where can you get that?

They gave them huge mags but only for specialized applications. I imagine they weren't very popular since they didn't return for WWII. It must be a pain loading pic related with stripper clips.

Attached: 367.jpg (1800x338, 48K)

why not just use all box magazines?

for the same reason most of these rifles had sights for 2000m volley fire

old men clinging to old doctrines

Is that a dust guard like on the T38?

Waffenfabrik Mauser, Oberndorf am Neckar, Kingdom of Wurttemburg.

James Paris Lee pls.

Attached: Russian_cavalry_prototype_Mauser_98_carbine_7,62x54mmR_1910_original_Mauser_factory_photo.jpg (1533x487, 90K)

Yes it is, according to the guys I stole the image from
rockislandauction.com/detail/59/367/danzig-gew-98

but it's faster to shoot 10 rounds that you loaded while not in combat than to shoot 5 and then reload while in combat. If the fight is resolved in the first 10 rounds it's an advantage. I don't know if that is a worth it or not.