How legal is luring paedophiles to your house and murdering them for trespassing?

TBQH im pretty sure that's legal in most parts of the US. Only places like europe and NYC are THAT cucked.

>How legal is ... murdering?
Well gee OP, I feel like you answered your own question.
youtube.com/watch?v=Xj1a59FKUOo&t=0m24s

He was literally telling everybody about it, admitted it to the cops, AND recorded it.

t. Live in the town where the shooting happened

Is there a video?

Not that I know of. It was an audio recording

>Who lured a couple of druggies into his garage
>lured

>druggies break into his house and steal shit
>happens several times
>old man decides instead of going out to bingo or whatever he'll just sit in his basement with a gun
>druggies break in again
>he kills them
The ruling on this one was a farce, it was based entirely on his remark when he shot the girl and his personal appearance. They were able to turn his reasonable conjecture that his house would be robbed again into premeditation. How many times is he supposed to call the cops and have them do nothing before he shoots the burglers? Is the attitude of "I will kill the next person that breaks into my house" really the same as "premeditation"? If so, I'm guilty.

Only cops are allowed to trick you into breaking the law and then arrest or kill you for it.

>Is the attitude of "I will kill the next person that breaks into my house" really the same as "premeditation"? If so, I'm guilty.
in our legal system, yes it is, and it will be for as long as someone with no morals has their pay depending on their mental gymnastics and word bending to put you in jail for killing their poor innocent client

You forgot how he killed someone who wasn’t a threat.
That’s called murder

Is it still illegal if you have a sign that says that anyone who breaks in will be shot?

Attached: supreme sacrifice.jpg (476x672, 43K)

AZ has similar laws. You can justify deadly force in cases where it's reasonable that you'd be set in such a rage that you can't hold yourself back from killing the person, ie: seeing your 5 year old getting raped.

That however does not include seeing someone stealing shit out of your garage or backyard or breaking into your car. It's sad that the vast majority of gun owners call themselves responsible yet don't even know when they're legally allowed to use their guns. You can have the best gun on the market and all the gucci tactics in the world, but if you don't know your state's justification for deadly force you're just a ticking time bomb waiting to get sent to prison and lose all your guns.

Seriously it would take less than 5 minutes on jewgle, look it up now for your particular state.

>You forgot how he killed someone who wasn’t a threat.
>That’s called murder
That's not how it works.

That is exactly how it works.

If you shoot someone, and they fall to the ground and otherwise are no longer a threat, then you rant for five minutes before executing them, that is 100% murder

You can absolutely shoot somebody breaking into your car in Texas. We have too many boomers with $100,000 brodozers and '67 Mustangs, they wouldn't sleep right if they couldn't.

Sounds like you are already planning the killing

Op you are the hero we need. They cant execute retards, so most youll get is five years in a minimum security mental health facility. Just drool alot durring the interrigations. Goodspeed user goodspeed.

You're an idiot, he executed them after the first initial shots, while saying "You're dead". Then he waited an entire day before calling the police. He was camped in his basement with snacks and drinks. A clear case of overstepping the bounds of self defense.

Quit fantasizing about shooting people. Its not fun.

If someone is just standing in your house they don’t pose a threat to you. Its perfecty legal to hold them at gunpoint and start issuing commands to get off your property or get on the ground. But plain shooting? No. You HAVE to articulate to the courts in ANY shooting that you felt in danger of losing your life or being grievously injured. That doesn’t mean they have to be armed, but it does mean they at least have to be responsing to your prescense aggressively. I.e. you hold them at gunpoint and order then to leave now and instead they start angrily walking or running towards you. I.e. they just kicked in the door and have a baseball bat i.e. they scream ILL KILL YOU or you see a gun in which case open fire

>all that shit
God I am so thankful to live in Texas. We don't have any of that.

If you care about preserving freedoms I give it 10 years before you have to start shooting.

This.

Attached: 1530928090486.png (720x720, 484K)

>They can't execute retards
lol tell that to Texas

Not as legal as it should be op...fucking kikes

>living in texas
Why live in nücali?

lol I live in the actual free state of Montana.

Just pointing out that the state everyone ITT is so proud of because you can dome somebody in the back of the head for tresspassing is ALSO they state where they routinely execute developmentally-disabled manchildren.

>Just pointing out that the state everyone ITT is so proud of because you can dome somebody in the back of the head for tresspassing is ALSO they state where they routinely execute developmentally-disabled manchildren.
I see nothing wrong with anything here.

The only thing wrong with that is waiting until they kill somebody instead of doing it at birth.

I'm vaguely remember that case cause how stupid the shooter was. Anyway, if the police just did their fucking job those kids would probably still be alive and might have not even seen any real jail time either. I really can't blame the guy because if some little shits kept robbing me over and over and the police won't help me, I'd do the same thing. I wouldn't fucking record it or let the bodies chill in my house for awhile before calling the cops though cause I'm not retarded. I'd just shoot the little shits and call the police.

> but if you don't know your state's justification for deadly force you're just a ticking time bomb waiting to get sent to prison and lose all your guns.

The problem is even if you follow the states justification depending on how cucked your jury is you could still end up in the slammer.

>I wouldn't fucking record it or let the bodies chill in my house
This, the dude was totally justified in shooting his home invaders but the recording, and just the fact that he recorded it, and then the suspiciousness of delayed reporting, plus his homeless, child rapist appearance led to a life-ending conviction for what should have been a non-arrest.

Honestly all those requirements are liberal horseshit politicians passed that cops don't care about and you know it. If someone breaks into your house unarmed and you blast them, you aren't going to be in any trouble in a state that doesn't suck as long as you don't say some dumb shit to the cops. They aren't going to take the word of a criminal over yours either if he survives. Just make sure to paint him as the aggressor and stick to your story. You have every right to protect your home with lethal force. The only people who disagree with that shit are virtue signalers and politicians.

Greetings from the queen city fellow montananon

Yeah probably don’t brag about it or record it

Since most pedophiles are people in authority like cops and politicians, prolly not legal

I'ma be honest I'd beat the ever loving fuck out out of someone for this no matter what state I'm in.

well fpbp I guess

Attached: 555mm.jpg (499x390, 68K)

Chick was on the deck wounded he dragged her in and put a gun under her chin, dude was always going down

Do It

That would be premeditated murder. You could literally get the death penalty for that.