HoweExcited are you for this melanin enhanced male to repeal the national firearms act?

why not, if they're on my side? I don't see your type complaining when the left gets theirs, only when we fight back.

It's almost as if people with short attention spans suddenly forget his judicial record of being extremely pro gun and pro constitution but because he gives tempered answers during the confirmation hearings LIKE HE HAS TO rather than just shouting SHALL NOT he is suddenly a fudd/rino/whatever

Fucking retards

Attached: 1534715076114.jpg (512x384, 39K)

Hopefully the hughes amendment goes away and never comes back. Banning full autos is a ridiculous infringement of liberty.

And for any absolute moron who thinks that hurp durp school shooters will get higher kill counts will full autos, you're wrong, they'll end up just emptying their magazine into the ceiling and even less people will die.

No you idiot. Everyone here is complaining when the left uses activist judges to circumvent the executive branch or legislate new or existing laws. Two wrongs don't make a right and at some point, someone has to take the high road. The courts are supposed to be impartial. Justice is supposed to be blind.

He's not going to get to the supreme court and shout SHALL NOT either. He can hold his beliefs and biases and set them aside when he puts on his robe. If he can't do that, he's not fit for the job.

He has made it clear that from his position absolute SHALL NOT'ing is part of the Constitution

Attached: 1533914839865.jpg (720x759, 73K)

> at some point, someone has to take the high road.

No, nobody has to. We're in a race to the bottom, and the only thing worse than getting there is being second place.

Just curious, where do you guys get the bulk of your news, particularly your information on Kavanaugh and what he can and will do as a supreme court justice?

This. I'm not expecting much from the guy, but he's not a grabber and I like that.

Do zoomers understand how the branches of our government work? Do they still teach government and civics in school?

Taking civics indoctrination at face value is how boomers created this mess.

Found the commie

No he hasn't
Not at all, he said he strongly agrees with Keller and that only "common use" weapons can be protected
So he will uphold any pre-existing ban.
If manufacturers stop making, for example, revolvers he would reason it's okay to ban them all together.

>learning how our government functions, the roles of each branch, how laws are written and interpreted, and learning how to think critically about government and legal issues and debating with civility is bad

I don't think many have bothered to watch any of the hearing or read anything about Kavanaugh from any reputable source or even bothered to read any of his written opinions.

They just hype what they wanna believe in and have read in other threads on Jow Forums and Jow Forums. I don't know maybe they got some hype mail from the NRA or something too.

Sorry, meant for

You don't understand right-wing thought, so you label it as the only outgroup you know.

Democracies *inb4 "but we're a republic)" are steered by whoever steers the populations' opinion and controls the factions.

Most civics classes teach that the three branches are counterbalances to each other (even the founders didn't believe that), and skip real checks and balances, like parallel government (deep state to you boomers) vs elected government.

Selling the party line is their function; not teaching critical thought or complex historical knowledge.

Sounds like something a communist would say.

>melanin enhanced
He's almost as white as his shirt.

I'm pretty sure he's not going to be rolling back the NFA, but the second an Assault Weapons ban reaches SCOTUS, that shit is getting destroyed. The mental gymnastics required to think that AR-15s aren't in common use is staggering.

I really hate the Heller decision, though. Completely misses the point of the Second Amendment.

I need the sauce on that image
It's for my senior thesis.

>melanin enhanced
??
do you know what that means ?

Attached: cant_arson_the_carson.jpg (792x884, 452K)

Implying this wouldn't be the best supreme court possible.

Attached: ideal_court.jpg (1024x682, 407K)

>Still don't know why you retards vote for these people
Alright, well let's look at the choices we have.

>NRA fudd
>Rabid anti-gun Jew.

Hmm...

>The mental gymnastics required to think that AR-15s aren't in common use is staggering.
Common use means common USE, not common ownership. Just because a lot of right wing freaks own AR15s doesnt mean they are commonly used.

How are they not commonly used? Are they not commonly shot at the range? Are they not common in competition? Just because they are not frequently used in self-defense shootings does not mean that their ownership or presence is not being used as a deterrent.

> random right winger user vs a long time US senator
Yeah sorry, not commonly used.

>Repeal NFA

lol never going to fucking happen, the (((NRA))) was responsible for it in the first place.

Attached: 1533853680163.jpg (890x719, 57K)

Shouldn't you be at your stem cell treatment from aborted goyim right now Feinstein?

Best case scenario is a ruling against AWBs. I'll take it. That's a nice win.

>Still don't know why you retards vote for these people
>SCOTUS judge
>vote for them
Fucking hell user...

>hurr it's bad!!!
It's moralfags like you is why we're in this mess, the left has no morals, only goals.
You'll hold you head up proudly as you're led to the gallows, it helps to get the noose tight.

>SC Justice vs a firearms illiterate elderly senator
Yeah sorry, precedence is on our side

So if you ditch your morals, how are you any different?

It's kill or be killed, you can restore your moral code once the threat has been eliminated. Communists CAN NOT BE ALLOWED TO GAIN A FOOTHOLD. There is NO action too severe to root them out, because the consequences of their victory is far worse than any action you could take.

You could detonate a nuclear weapon in 10 American cities, and that is still better than having a communist government.

>he's an originalist, which means
No, he's primarily a precedentalist. There's precedent for restricting gun rights; he's not going to ignore that.

Decent bait. Still tho, fuck off with it.

I'm not even sure what the fuck you're advocating anymore. I'm not sure that you even know what you're advocating anymore.

>he's not going to ignore that.
Neither is any judge that makes it to the highest court in the country.

The Outcome Justifies The Deed.
Communists utterly destroy whatever nation they've taken over, economically, socially, morally, and physically. The millions of people killed by communists died in vain, so equalling or even EXCEEDING the death count is perfectly justified.

I'd rather see my country turned into a radioactive wasteland rather than let communists gain power, I'd even turn the keys myself.

Watch the edge there, sperg

I remember when I was 12 and had strong opinions like that.

Cody Wilson maybe?

oooof

ok sweetie

Your self perceived moral superiority is obnoxious and stupid. The game is already rigged.

>t.commie

Attached: 1535562176351.jpg (500x375, 33K)

>presidential appointee
>vote
I mean fuck, we don't even really vote for the President (the popular vote is meaningless as the electoral college has no duty to follow the popular vote and they themselves aren't voted in).

this

>t. person with no arguments

He thinks MGs are banned and has repeatedly expressed that he would be happy for them to remain banned. He's not going to do you any favors.

>Communists utterly destroy whatever nation they've taken over, economically, socially, morally, and physically. The millions of people killed by communists died in vain, so equalling or even EXCEEDING the death count is perfectly justified.

Fuck you.

I expect absolutely nothing from him and that's both a good and a bad thing.

>If I destroy my nation economically, socially, morally, and physically and kill millions of people in vain but say it's to prevent some vague communist threat I'm the good guy!

I'm not a fan of activism, and don't believe that SCOTUS should be a superlegislature. So a return to normalcy is very welcome.

I think OP meant it in the mynigga.jpg sense.

What do you think a good crew served weapon for children is?

Im with the other user. You're helping the left by overtly being this retarded. Immoral stuff must be done covertly and never be found or you hurt yourself

mortar

Your moral high road is what got us into this mess in the first place. It will be the death of our rights, then the death of us.

You ignorant as fuck my man. Name all the times the electoral college went against their states popular vote. Name all the times it also impacted the election.
Each state handles it their own way and some obligate they ether all go one way or its divided by the states proportional vote. Holy shit dude there's tons of stuff explaining this

He mostly goes by president, tradition and what ever is mostly non-sided.
Hes mostly a fence sitter, bench sitter hes not making plays and doing dances.
If things aren't broken he is not one to fix them.
If this is how badly things have gotten, that bench sitter are play makers then i don't know what people will do when a true believer shows up.

Because he like the rest of the scotus believe (rightly) that machine guns its not a good idea for every tom dick and Sally to be able to walk into walmart and buy a machine gun, cry about the 2nd all you want but seeing as semiautomatic fire is generally more effective I don't see what the issue is. I'm fully supportive of the current nfa, though I would prefer to see the short barrelled stuff and suppressors taken off it, I also believe we should allow new manufacture of machine guns, but raise the tax stamp cost to like 500 or something to try and balance it out. There should definitely be another layer of checks that go into a machine gun, I can only imagine what kind of damage some stupid incel could do with an m249.

SHALL

Ever ask yourself why they started with a tax stamp and registry then closed the registry? Because they knew full well they were trying to do something unconstitutional and tried to skirt it on technical grounds.

You need to do less listening and more reading.
Pick up a book in the basement of any library.
Start with Federalist papers.
Don't listen just read them. All of those fears have come true. Every single one.
The Federalist were wrong.

This

>believe (rightly) that machine guns its not a good idea for every tom dick and Sally to be able to walk into walmart and buy a machine gun
t. boomer doctor who owns 4 or 5 MGs and doesn't want their value to decrease

>gop having the balls to do anything like the dnc

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: 1524527577290.jpg (955x541, 296K)

>muh dik

Nice double dubs.

"Use" would mean you want to read the constitution and not just feel your way threw it.
If you want literal reading of the words of the constitution then i am all for that.
Otherwise stop "USE"ing words you don't know the meaning of.

The electoral college almost always follows the will of their state, the popular vote isn't the deciding factor because then the few liberal populated states would control every aspect of the country.

This. I can tolerate the NFA but I can't take an outright full-on ban lying down.

Attached: bateman-axe.jpg (400x300, 36K)

Will be repealed in 2050 when brown super majority materializes and they can eexpand the bench to 13.

Oh the joys of the full auto market returning.
And the disbanding of the ATF.
Oh how such a marvel would bring to thee.

This guy gets it.

Anybody unwilling to kill leftists (including friends and family) within the next decade is an actual coward and will be complicit in their own death at the hands of a thousand spics.

Yeah, but nobody is going to repeal the NFA from the SCotUS, that would be as retarded as repealing DC v. Heller.

Daily reminder that Jow Forums is a limp wristed moderate board that the denizens of will gladly give their guns to nearest cop when the time comes.

Worst of all they will counter signal all of us gunning down traitorous door kickers for "making law abiding gun owners look bad".

Nou

The best you can hope for is AWBs being struck down, or may issue bullshit getting curbed. Again, I emphasize that's the absolute best case scenario. At least he's not an avowed gun grabber.

Attached: joan-2.jpg (662x923, 642K)

Read the whole post before responding please.

Atf regulates more than guns you know

I don't understand how all these pussy bitch Politicians can sit around acting like they're pro-gun, without attempting to actively dismantle the LITERAL INFRINGEMENT the NFA, Hugh's amendment are inflicting on Law Abiding Americans every day.

Following the written law is needed more then safety, more then life.
What is safety or life without the law, its tyranny, edicts and madness.
If you want to change the wording of the law thats one thing, if you want to unmake written law thats another.
Never sacrifice order for madness. The result always ends the same.

Attached: 1529610974916.gif (420x315, 1.91M)

Nope, it's perfectly justified. Communism is a literal existential threat, it's far better to kill as many people that is required to prevent it.

The coastal states need their gun laws to be found unconstitutional. Idgaf about anything else. New Jersey has no ability to conceal carry and i feel violated. Also a limit to 10 rounds is arbitrary and retarded.

>thots getting dropped by a M249
HNNNNGGG

dumbass. literal "we have to destroy the village to save it" tier thinking

Absolutely! if that village is filled with Communist Niggers and Sneaky anti white kikes