>Be inna Hind
>Carry MiG into battle
>Drop MiG in enemy lines
>MiG fires munitions
>Carry it back when empty
Why isn't this the standard?
>Be inna Hind
>Carry MiG into battle
>Drop MiG in enemy lines
>MiG fires munitions
>Carry it back when empty
Why isn't this the standard?
Other urls found in this thread:
Crashing this MiG..
WITH NO SURVIVORS
>no survivors
just like russian tanks then
Dr. Pavel I'm MIG
Or Russian Hostages
Reminder that they have Tigers
If I cut this cable will you die?!
No, I have glorious ejection seat.
But you, comrade, will not survive when I come back in my backup MiG and strafe you with my 23mm cannon.
MiG can't shoot on land by itself.
There are four independent systems in place to ensure there are no accidental discharges.
You won't fire anything without attaching a system used for zeroing the cannons, or a fair amount of jury-rigging.
Because thats not a Hind you fucktard
You're a big jet.
Because that's an Mi-26, you dip.
для тeбя
>VTOL mig
Who the fuck insures these tour providers?
Poor lion just wants to play
>Be inna Hind
Contrary to popular misconception, not every Russian helicopter is a Hind.
whoa i didnt know hinds were so big.
Please kill yourself retard
It's like a mother watching over her babies.
the only way a TU-134 can fly safely.
>Some 69 Tu-134 have been destroyed in accidents and wars, of which 35 were non-fatal incidents (in one of the remaining 34 fatal incidents no one on the plane died).
>As of June 2018, the DC-9 has been involved in 276 aviation occurrences, including 145 hull-loss accidents
Бopщ
>saying that one plane is unsafe means another unrelated one is safe
wew. also how much do Tu-134s fly compared to how much DC-9s fly?
you're a big helicopter
What if it carries a tank instead? It can shoot shit further because of the altitude.
Your a big plane
>jury-rigging.
That's not what I meant. My point is that you have to compare the performance of similar things for it to make sense. Case in point,
>Within the group of comparable airliners (Il-62/Il-62M, VC10/Super VC10, Boeing 707, DC8) the Il-62M had the lowest hull loss rate.
Yes, but the accuracy will be abysmal. So some PGM artillery would make more sense.
Going over the list it's almost entirely pilot error and being destroyed in an armed conflict.
The fire rises
For you.
Rule 34.
>Crimea
>insurance providers
This is like my neighbor asking who signed those Thai kids' permission slips to go in that cave, user.
>8 blades...
Mo blades, mo bettah. Its interesting to see russia using the same ideas we did in the 70’s.
Was this some kind of contract job in the Stan?
Looks like it. The Mi-26 has "Vertical-T" written on the side. That's a Russian air freight company from Tver. During the Obama administration a contractor pilot from Vertical-T named Valeriy Likhachev used a Mi-26 to transport a CH-47 that made an emergency landing in Kandahar. I would assume this is a photo of that.
Thanks for the knowledgeable response. Very impressive, unironically
Considering how big the Mi-26 is, more blades is very much justified.
no, but my air frame will be greatly damaged
I would totally go on this tour and pet the fuck outta that cat.
the reaper