If AR SBRs are bad, why do soldiers and spec ops use them

If AR SBRs are bad, why do soldiers and spec ops use them

Attached: 4A3B62EA-0FCA-408A-AFAA-5D97974006C7.jpg (657x650, 114K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ZlgsaIKDMNc
youtube.com/watch?v=e1tAtW2JKRE
youtube.com/watch?v=HRQ10zvROF8
youtube.com/watch?v=SAUp2bBE4Eg
youtube.com/watch?v=ZPQOzuceTnk
youtube.com/watch?v=d8IvDPuVuho
youtube.com/watch?v=bP2y3C98Fio
youtube.com/watch?v=RD7NvKzzWFE
greeneyetactical.com/2017/08/29/the-cqb-distance-myth/
azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2016/05/03/navy-seal-charlie-keating-arcadia-grad-and-grandson-charles-keating-killed-iraq/83891350/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

They aren't bad.

Attached: 1525413308119.jpg (1078x1308, 840K)

Because only retards think AR SBRs are bad.
>inb4 “5.56 was designed around a 20” barrel!”
Yeah it was - in 1963. There have been a lot of advances in ammo since then.

CONTAINMENT THREAD, uncreative AR douchebag.

Attached: 84La.gif (350x146, 2.44M)

I’m an AK guy. I’m getting into ARs and I want a 10.5

True

Because they call for artillery to kill people.

What if I told you (this is some pretty radical far out shit so you'll have to sit down before you hear this) that Jow Forums (okay last chance to back out because these are some truth bombs that are going to lose me friends and social capital) knows fuckall about guns beyond poring over functionally irrelevant stat sheets and wikipedia articles.

Edgy.

Attached: thumb_m-r-leave-the-lady-be-19131075.png (200x251, 42K)

poorly worded, was a bit confused at what you were trying to say. But I think I got it..

Attached: dangerous.jpg (530x650, 104K)

Nothing wrong with sbrs but also depends on what you are doing. If you lived in the middle of a fucking field and wanted to protect your home you should probably have a long barrel.