Myanmar has bought the multirole JF-17 from China and Pakistan.
Interestingly, it is also suggested that they have bought the CM-400AKG hypersonic anti-ship missile as well.
Looks like the Buddhist warriors are preparing to sink US carriers when they come over to provide "humanitarian support" to moderate islamic terrorists in their country.
Other urls found in this thread:
vol.at
derstandard.at
deagel.com
theguardian.com
twitter.com
Official models showing the CM-400AKG aeroballistic airlaunched hypersonic carrier killer.
Now this is classic chinkposting.
Very nice livery.
>implying I'm not absolutely correct
The US loves muslims so much that they have been propping up ISIS for years and run a giant global ad campaign in support of islamic fundamentalists and terrorists in China, while simultaniously backing and protecting Saudi Arabia and Bonesaw Mohammed who slaughtered that New York Times journalist Kashoggi.
America is literally Sweden in terms of bending themselves backwards to please their muslim overlords.
I really would like to see some sort of asian coallition to oppose the US interests in the region, but every asian nation seems to hate chinks
Those are some mighty odd looking Mig-21's.
The conspiracy that interests me the most here is the idea that the US is "propping up ISIS" especially since none of the other 55 countries in the CJTF have said anything about it.
chinks are a skin-disease, US funded muslim terrorists are a heart-disease.
>none of the other 55 countries in the CJTF have said anything about it.
None of them said anything about Kashoggi being cut apart while alive and then the murderers protected by none other but Trump either.
vely implessive
Your posting style is so fucking obvious
>The US loves muslims so much that they have been propping up ISIS for years
Proof?
The JF-17 is the great equalizer and the most democratic fighter jet ever.
It is cheap, modern, capable and, most importantly, open.
Its avionics are written in C++ and are open architecture, allowing each nation to integrate the plane into whatever datalink standard they use and put whatever weapons they want onto it, without having to ask NATO for any keys or CIA-nigger personell in the US to remotely unlock your planes before you use them (like Austria, who couldnt even fly their Eurofighters without the authorization keys held by American NATO supervisors).
And with the advanced hypersonic CM-400AKG it has a good chance to penetrate even Aegis defenses and thus deter the American carriers that will be sent against you once you decide to declare independence from the Israel-led global exploitative system. This fighter is literally the handgun for the weak woman vs. the 300lbs giganigger that is the USA. A great equalizer.
You might think that the Chinese are evil and want to control everything and all... But the democratizational effects of the JF-17 fighter jet shows that even weak nations can achieve true independence by buying open source Chinese goods.
No wonder the West hates China, for they provide true freedom and independence for the weak nations of the world: Freedom and Independence from the jews and the american deep state.
Brothers in Arms.
chink posting this hard
Well, yes they have considering even elements of the USA have too.
>Completely random man in a photo
>Labelled as the head of fucking ISIS
>This is proof enough for you
Jesus Wept
>US carriers when they come over to provide "humanitarian support" to moderate islamic terrorists
>keys to unlock
Surely you cannot be this retarded
Oh, my sweet summer child...
If you amerifats dont love muslims, then why do you support European countries so generously?
Why are you in strong, mutually binding NATO agreement with a continent ran by muslims?
>continent ran by muslims
Russia isnt in controll of the continent, no matter what RT says
kek
vol.at
derstandard.at
>everytime the Austrian Airforce wants to fly their Eurofighters, they have to ask the US to provide a cryptokey to unlock its datalink system.
Look Mom, this is what we would call "a fucking tool".
>Official models
So, government sanctioned toys?
Best budget fighter hands down.
Cant wait for the Block III with AESA.
>muslim overlords.
Ok now, you guys need to get your story straight. Are we fighting for Israel, or for Mecca?
Israel supports a certain brand of Islamism that is shared among the worst muslim-offenders in the world.
>Looks nothing like a Mig 21
Clearly a Mig 21.
>without having to ask NATO for any keys or CIA-nigger personell in the US to remotely unlock your planes before you use them (like Austria, who couldnt even fly their Eurofighters without the authorization keys held by American NATO supervisors).
You know, had you actually read the articles you posted, you'd realize they don't actually support what you said:
>In addition, they need support from a US company behind which US intelligence NSA is suspected. However, this can not be proven.
>For this, employees of the US company are working at the Bundesheer airport in Zeltweg
>The Eurofighters can also fly without a crypto key, which Austria also pays for their use
So:
1. It cannot be proven.
2. If true, this is a US civilian company based in Austria.
3. They can fly without the datalink keys.
MiG-21 is a codeword for "Planes that I am not suppossed to like because they are made by our race-enemies"
>meme spacing
>hypersonic carrier killer.
It’s a slightly faster Exocet. You can’t even kill a frigate with those things.
Still fucking sad. What If you are at war against another NATO member that the American favor more than you (eg. Greece vs Turkey, with US behind Turkey because Greece is too pro-Chinese), and you cant utilize the datalink systems to link up with your NATO standard AEW&C and weapon systems, but the roach can?
Wouldnt have happened if you bought Chinese in the first place.
Let him have his fantasies
deagel.com
>Mach 4 cruise, maneuverable ballistic arc and Mach 5+ terminal plunge
Yeah, tell me about those Exocets.
How is it sad? You don't even know if it is true or not for the reasons I've pointed out.
A third party company would be involved with the supposed keys (since it is their product) - regardless if they had gone Chinese or not.
At first I was going to say what are paragraph breaks, then I realized that first block of text was a single run-on sentence. Don’t harp on his spacing, user, yell about his middle school composition skills.
Pakistan needs no US cryptokeys to fly their JF-17 linked up with their ZDK-03 Silk-Road Eyes AWACS. And they dont even need any Chinese cryptokeys for that matter to fire Brazilian-made MAR-1 anti radiation missiles, their own Ra'ad cruise missiles or French Durandal bombs.
Same with Myanmar now, who is free of American inteference in their vital national defense matters.
Buying Chinese is what seperates the CHADS from the virgin slaves of the false orange emperor.
>Backed by China's global reputation for build quality
Huawei literally has the best smartphone on the market right now and are leaders in 5G (which, coincidentially requires mastering of GaN transceiver chip technology).
The US literally cannot compete and thus need to play dirty and invent "security concerns" and resort to kidnapping to stop them from dominating the world.
CM400AKG: 150 or 200 kg warhead.
Exocet: 165 kg warhead.
It’s just a fancier Exocet. All of the propaganda in the world isn’t going to magically turn that anemic warhead into a credible threat. Especially when it’s deployed from a plane with open source datalinking. It’s like the missile comes with a self jamming mode already installed.
speed kills, user.
>Pakistan needs no US cryptokeys to fly their JF-17 linked up with their ZDK-03 Silk-Road Eyes AWACS. And they dont even need any Chinese cryptokeys for that matter to fire Brazilian-made MAR-1 anti radiation missiles, their own Ra'ad cruise missiles or French Durandal bombs.
My post above doesn't conflict with that and you know that - as I said, you will need encryption keys from the company that you *buy* the datalink or crypto product from.
That has nothing to do with it being American or not. This is entirely to do with buying a product from a company and how the contract is done.
Well, it’s true. China does have a global reputation for build quality. We’ll discuss that reputation, and what that quality is, in another thread.
Do you realize the capabilities denied to you when datalink is down?
They make good stuff that doesnt take 100 years to complete due to diversity hire. This is a fact.
Implessive
I do, but that has nothing to what was asserted.
On the other hand their infrastructure doesn't last 100 years due to graft and shit quality materials.
>No wonder the West hates China, for they provide true freedom and independence for the weak nations of the world: Freedom and Independence from the jews and the american deep state.
This, and pic related.
Whitoids are still salty for having lost their lucrative semi-colony.
You got btfo on speed and now you’re getting btfo because you really are a retard.
Nah, Koreans are worse.
And american decaying infrastructure is barely 50 years old and already breaking down.
You’re full of shit.
>buying mig-21s in 2018
I don't understand the comparation
I see nothing wrong with that. At least China does something against it.
Meanwhile, here in Europe, 99% of all countries banned US meat for being full of growth hormone and being low quality shit that turns you into a transgender scum.
Decolonization of Asia was a mistake.
I don't care about the Muslims in Myanmar but just a reminder that the Mynamar military is also killing Christians and only just a few years ago were killing and torturing Buddhists, the same Buddhists that are fighting the Muslims in Myanmar.
It doesn’t have enough mass to be a significant threat to a carrier. A plunging attack MAY present a greater risk to the escort ships, but not orders of magnitude greater. You’re also ignoring the fact that the CM400AKG has a relatively short range, meaning its delivery platform is well within SM-6 interception range long before it his the outer edge of it’s launch window. Best case scenario, you’re looking at throwing away a launch platform for every hit you achieve.
You’ll need to get a lot of hits to seriously endanger a carrier. You might run out of planes before that happens.
Oh, really? According to the links in this thread, it’s not even hypersonic, Corky. You have to get above Mach 5 to play in the hypersonic realm. You’re gonna have to ramp that little bitty warhead up a lot faster than M5 for it to be meaningful, Rainman. Not that it would matter, Special Ed, because higher speed simply means you would miss faster because you were so mentally deficient that you launched it at high altitude from an open source platform. Jesus Christ, you’re about an ignorant nigger.
The low range is just because it is an export variant and has to comply with the MTCR. The CM-400AKG is literally based on a maneuverable SRBM called the SY-400 that has a longer range.
And the biggest selling point is that it is maneuverable during cruise flight, making it hard to intercept.
The Chinese used a civilian variant of the same missile to drop a sensor payload into the eye of a typhoon back in 2014 due to this missile's inherent maneuverbility achieved through TVC and steerable central vanes.
>muh monkey model
MTCR compliancy isnt monkey model. The maneuverbility and the terminal hypersonic plunge speed is retained. Just the range has to be limited to under 300km.
>making it hard to intercept.
Irrelevant, since the launch platform is much slower, much easier to intercept, and hackable.
>terminal hypersonic plunge speed
Hypersonic is above M5. This isn’t hypersonic. And I thought they did some hand waving, dubbing it rocket artillery, to get around the restrictions?
>you were so mentally deficient that you launched it from an open source platform
Apologize
>sink US carriers
Myanmar is an ally of Israel
This is such a fake pic
So, JF-17 is like Gentoo compared to American fighters being OSX?
wtf I love china now.
Thanks for the good laugh, Chinknik
So you think you're smart believing at first glance a badly cropped completely unsourced image?
Damn you a good anti American, are you the kind of left winger we need these days.
>Jews and the American deep state
damn you sound kinda alt-righty there
this thread op
why JF-17 is piece of shit
The ROCAF and the J-10/Lavi are far superior.
Along with the original F-16.
Ok Im gonna have to start a China vs Pakistan thread.
And China vs India and Pakistan thread (TOTAL CURRY REMOVAL). And Chinese thirst of Bollywood and Paki pussy.
in the future
JF-17 is basically an F-5 in capabilities. African dictatorships can use it to bomb their own people at least
Bullshit. Try a modernised F-20
>Myanmar
Litterally, who?
Nice propaganda campaign Chong.
It's what is known as a target rich environment. Any credible aggression against the USN would render the offending countries shit pushed in. Especially if they're using shit tier airframes such as that.
How well does the most updated upgraded JF-17 do against one on one with the most updated/upgraded F-20 and the Taiwanese IDF.
I remember there was this Paki strong video on youtube where the PakAF JF-17 took down Indian AF Su-30s. LOL
The US didn't do shit to the Saudis after the killing of a reporter since Saudi are a useful economic and military ally. Besides what else do you expect from a country that kills gays?
Countries buy Chinese and Russian crap since its cheap and comparable to regional countries
Then why do they continue to steal American tech?
Or maybe they're cheap since they don't have wage standards. Why do you think they built Western railroads?
Yeah yeah yeah Mao
There's nothing wrong with executing gay men, and raping dykes. Everyone should be doing that. Although cute sexy pretty traps are to be spared because they make nice sex slaves.
trannies dont eat meat
Yes they do, they swallow mine.
JF17 is one ugly jet. It looks like a wanna be F-16
>Any credible aggression against the USN would render the offending countries shit pushed in.
Really? I don't see you invading the Philippines.
>with the most updated/upgraded F-20 and the Taiwanese IDF.
>most updated/upgraded F-20
>updated/upgraded F-20
Nigga u wut?
If China invaded the Philippines it would make them look bad. China would look like an evil bully harassing a much smaller and poorer nation.And condemnation from the international community. And probably get kicked out of the UN.
>China does have a global reputation for build quality.
It certainly does, just not in the way you think it is.
What do you think happened to the crew of that freighter