Post gunfight scenes that ruined a movie/tv show/etc. for you

The Heat shootout.
Because I know there wont be another like it anytime soon.

Attached: 2048x2730-deniro-heat-shootout-43-jpg-32db0c50.jpg (480x480, 30K)

>gunfight scenes that ruined a movie
>posts the most outrageously awesome thing ever committed to film

>Over 100 microphones set up across the street
>No music, only gunfire and screams
>M4 Reloads so good they were put on display at Fort Bragg
Truly art at it's finest.

essplain

The goofy way they push up the beach and hit those bunkers wasn't enough for you?
>Tankstops are great cover

?

They aren't great cover but they were better than all the nothing around them

Pretty sure it was supposed to be a joke

Thanks for that user. Never seen it before. Just watched it on youtube.

Its meant to be dramatic user. I thought the beach scene was great and still is great.

Watch the whole movie, but be ready to cry

Re-watching the Sopranos after becoming hasguns is a bit painful

Attached: 1507136226468.png (798x436, 319K)

what in the fuck is that? looks like a starter pistol or something.

Your right , my great uncle was shipped to Europe right after D-Day, but he always told the kids stories he heard from guys that were there. Apparently there was no mg42s or bunkers that were aimed directly at the beach, in fact very few died on the beach itself. The gruesome depiction comes from the soldiers then having to clear a complicated series of connected bunkers that had interlocking areas of fire, but these bunkers were located almost a mile back from the actual beach head

lol did some liberal California intern design that prop?

>literally explains why they've got to push up the beach
user, you are literally borderline retarded. Amphibious assault rule #1
GET OFF THE FUCKING BEACH.
The beach is nothing more than a killzone, mortars and arty are not a possibility, they are a EVENTUALITY.

It's a flashpaper gun. Meant to have the effects but not be shot in closeup. Cameraman fucked up.

Don't talk to me, or my wife's son ever again.

Attached: 4HdkWCN9evrlWEiZDEfO4FWoOVW1tp4jVuHrW1MRKg4.jpg (768x768, 139K)

I wish we got Hollywood movies that were willing to be as dumb as that, instead of the latest batch of shitty award bait.

what was goofy about that? there was little to no cover and they were under all sorts of fire who wouldnt immediately push up to that sand berm?

Attached: tumblr_oqf5kxSg2O1s3rdxdo3_r1_540.gif (540x225, 2.84M)

With a fucking pennnnciiiiiiil

>*explosion 10 feet away from me that leaves me completely unharmed*
>*Cue dramatic sound muffling effect as people die around me as I blankly stair at them*
Yup, that’s how war is boys. I’ve heard interviews with real WW2 vets that say the beach scene from Saving Private Ryan was the most realistic depiction of Normandy they’ve ever seen.

Attached: 737DCDA8-9FEF-49AD-A130-4C74B398A5DD.jpg (380x349, 37K)

Well the entire layout of the beach isn't accurate at all. I get in terms of film making having large concrete bunkers looming over you is more dramatic and all that, but in reality the majority of the bunkers didn't face the shoreline head-on, but instead from an angle. This meant that the advancing Americans were shot from their sides, and the naval guns/tanks couldn't fire into the bunkers housing the MGs. Well in the tanks case they would have to drive up the beach to get in position to fire in the bunker but in doing so they would drive right into the sights of an anti-tank gun.

In the movie they have a brief moment to reorganize in relative safety at the shingles, before blowing a hole in the wire and advancing. In reality, the same bunker with the anti-tank gun was positioned so it was facing the shingle. So basically if you somehow made it to the shingle, you would immediately get shot from your flank by machine guns.

Now in Saving Private Ryan they basically built a beach in I believe England to use for filming, and naturally the beach they made was no where near accurate to the real location. The
main inaccuracies in my opinion besides the incorrect layout would be that the battle seemed to only take an hour or two, and a decent amount of people survived the first wave. In reality the first couple waves were almost completely wiped out, and those that made it out of their landing crafts hide as best as they could in the water and followed the tide up the beach. Most of the men spent the whole day in the water, because if you poked your head out or moved too much you got raked by machine gun fire. So in the end Omaha was a really really shitty place and the battle was won because a handful of men managed to make it off the beach and flank the defenders.

So in reality the actual beach was much, much worse than in the film, and if anything I'm just disappointed that the film didn't do the actual battle justice in that regard.

Want some pie?

i think it wouldve been better to have a whole movie set for that battle but they had a different story they wanted to tell

I just went on maps and roughly measured the distance between the low tide waterline and the shingles, and got a distance of ~360 meters. That is much longer than depicted in the film, and seeing that really puts in perspective just how fucked you would have been, having the advance that far across a mined beach with MGs shooting at you from multiple angles. Which is why the survivors stayed put in the water; they would have died if they actually tried to push forward.

link for the lazy: google.com/maps/@49.3724428,-0.8780487,584m/data=!3m1!1e3

K I N O
I
N
O

Wouldn't say "ruined" considering what a silly movie Boondock Saints 2 was, but this was the dumbest gun-related thing I've ever seen. She cocks the gun in this scene, the gun being a Para-Ordnance LDA Carry, a gun which does not have an exposed hammer capable of being cocked. She just kinds of runs her thumb over the back and they edited in a cocking sound. I had to stop and rewind that scene when I saw it. I really hope the actress pointed this out on set.

Attached: 800px-BDS2-LDA-4.jpg (800x341, 60K)

you must love Ant-Man 1 then

implying some dumb actress knows literally anything about guns

How much knowledge does it take?
>"cock the gun"
>"how? there's nothing to grab a hold of?"

That's believable though

Into the trash you go

Attached: 1542529648824.webm (1280x720, 2.24M)

ask me how I know you dont talk to a lot of women

>the battle seemed to only take an hour or two

My impression from watching that scene has always been that the battle lasted for about 15 minutes and was only 'won' because the GI's managed to get from the water to the shingle and then blow a single hole in a single obstacle, at which point all resistance magically ceased.

In reality of course it took them practically all day to barely secure two small areas, at which point they were then faced with the task of advancing inland where most of the 'real' defenses lay.

I forgive this scene because of the Catacomb firefight earlier was fantastic.
>watched it with my sister and afterwards she started looking up how much a Benelli M4 actually cost
youtu.be/HsDV7nNftAM

Beach was in Ireland, a lot of the extras were reservists in the Irish Defense Forces.

classic.

The entire point of the silencer scene is to hammer in that there is this secret society/war happening right below the surface of our conciousness that us normies can't perceive. Stop taking it so literally.

what... what the fuck is this?

This is one of the most Jow Forumsino scenes ever produced.

Attached: 1542579953963.gif (220x143, 202K)

I love the over the top action, but that editing is atrocious.

The way henchmen keep popping up from off-screen to get killed gets really obvious as the movie goes along. The first movie was concise enough for it not to be so noticeable as in the second.

Best fight in cinema history right here.

Attached: lol9mm.gif (320x170, 2.99M)

>pose with gun and we'll add muzzle flare later

In We Were Soldiers there's no gook wounded. 5.56 kills everyone it hits but ak rounds leave scores of American wounded.

Doesn't ruin the movie at all but it's an example

Nice quads

Dead Heat is a lot of fun. It's low budget, but they used it to the max, nothing extraneous in it. It feels very "pure" because of that.

There were multiple beaches, user. Only one of five was heavily directly opposed like in the movie.

The entire Dunkirk movie. It's so lame it hurts.

The new Spider-Man movie had a single gun in the entire thing and they fucked it up.

>dude shoots a hammer fired semi-auto pistol
>cocks the hammer for emphasis immediately after shooting

They look like they're fucking larping

Attached: 1530663975587.jpg (497x732, 174K)

What a good movie

Is this just a high budget porno intro?

>Sttand in the middle of the street and shoot on full auto
Cringe. Confirmed for never getting shot at.

its real apparently
its in breaking bad when combo gets shot

You're a retard. Obviously the glorious GI's of freedom had 100% perfect shot placement, whereas the disgusting communist bugmen hit non-vitals only.

Yeah, I kinda miss the days of over the top trash like Commando and Missing In Action. Sure it was dumb, but at least most of that stuff was fun and self aware and didn't try to be anything other than fun entertainment.

I've been to Omaha beach, it's fucked. Aside from the shitty steel tank stops the only slight cover there was was the sand berm.

Knowing Keanu, I'm pretty certain that scene was just ironic comic relief

Man that one scene I saw from Las Vegas...sounded like there were gunmen all over the place going off.
So disappointed it was just one boomer making all that noise.

>Dumped out onto an open beach
>Wouldn't use what cover was available as the world explodes and the soldiers around you die en mass.

Also
>The goofy way they push up the beach and hit those bunkers wasn't enough for you?

Goofy?

>because Jow Forums makes my oversympathize with nazi germany, i am unable to enjoy movies where germans are the enemy

its not everyone elses fault that you mindbroke yourself.

“The Rule of Cool” is a thing in movie making you know.

>high budget
kek

Not a gunfight and not movie ruining but it sort of annoyed me that in Hostiles the calvarymen all had 6 rounds loaded in their Colt Single Actions while on horseback....
Everyone please watch Hostiles it's fucking good.

Attached: 20170330_140130.jpg (4032x3024, 1.13M)

Is there more to this?

Attached: 485346211-kangaroo_jack.jpg (250x250, 13K)

Let's not all forget the best ten minutes that came out of bollywood, though.
youtube.com/watch?v=tsRgtaS70WA

Commando was peak 80s action film. It checked every box. Arnold, huge body count, he never reloads, pointless flexing and shirtless scenes, dumb one liners. It’s great.

everyrything was great but it still had that 80's action movie vibe where the leqd chracters never get hurt until the end of the movie o for dramatic effect. That's why Craig's James Bond was endearing to some people, he actually got hurt.

Attached: 1536851462094.png (1440x1557, 738K)

Anything where the "good guy" uses a semi auto pistol only, and the bad guys use heavy automatic weapons fire only for all the bulelts to miss. Especially in cases where it is a shit ton of automatic weapons fire.

It's probably one of the best gunfight scenes in cinema but man I wish it had the snapping sounds that bullets make when they fly by.

Hostiles was just OK, scenery and shootan Injuns was gr8 but 2/3 of movie is woman wailing about dead family so eh

If it hit center of mass....then its accurate. 5.56 NATO of the time was just coated lead. When it hit significant resistance, it fucking exploded into shrapnel. Against unarmored targets, it was the most lethal round ever fired out of a service rifle. IT STILL IS. That thing popped wide more effectively than 9mm hollowpoints. You couldn't extract a 5.56 bullet, only dig out pieces.

Meanwhile, the AK's 7.62x39mm was more solid, had way less velocity, and thus had more punching power. At close ranges, it could and did go straight through a human being and hit another human. But you could dig out the round of the second guy, and patch up the first guy. It did have the advantage of being good against certain forms of cover.

But the 5.56 NATO Lead Core in Vietnam? It was not a wounding round, it was a killing one.

It only gets worse if you watch their trigger fingers.

5.45 is still the master race though.

this

That was like watching a live action of a terrible anime

Why do they look like they're talking about whether or not they left the oven on, in the middle of a gunfight?

Yeah, if it doesnt overpenetrate, it snaps into pieces. It doesn't quite have the soft target lethality of the 5.56 lead core, but it was never meant to. That it does is kinda amazing.