Or destroy it, signed into law this morning.
Constructive possession applies and carries a minimum sentence of 10 years and a $250,000 fine.
Or destroy it, signed into law this morning.
Constructive possession applies and carries a minimum sentence of 10 years and a $250,000 fine.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
will not comply
will comply
So I shouod buy one now? Out of spite of course.
hope you didn't buy from slide fire, ATF has their records
So it begins.
American revolution 2
Electric bugaloo
LE BASED MAGA MAN, IM NOT TIRED OF WINNING!
Thanks, NRA.
mfw binary triggers aren't affected and those are superior to the bump stock anyway
cranks and binary triggers are included.
Link?
Get bent, ATF
They are not included, only "slide-fire" type devices.
>executive order changing a written law
>states do not comply and take it to court
>gets overturned by supreme court for being unconstitutional
>bumpstocks permanently legalized
I don't see whats wrong with this
It's in the legalese, trump just set the floor and established a "reasonable rate of fire" for semi automatic rifles, cranks,bumpstocks,and binary triggers are to fast and are machine guns.
Ok, so no, you are just blowing smoke out your ass, ok, cool.
>still thinking the SCOTUS will swoop in like Gandalf and save guns
Kek
>constructive possession applies
Does this mean I can't shoot my AR if I have a rubber band in my pocket? Because I could bumpfire with it?
No one cares Sage
Haha what is it about gun owners that turns them into the political cuck everyone dicks down on?
Real talk, constitutionally you're down to 10 round pistols and fudd guns. That's the new line in the sand? Tick tock it's already precedent and will spread nationally
4d chess retard posts should be ignored
prove me wrong?
No it's not faggot, it's a limited scope ruling to ”bump stock characteristic", but I bet it due time they will ban echo and binary triggers. Fuck this gay world.
So when are the protests and pushback that everyone said would happen
I have zero confidence this will even go before SCOTUS and even if it does two of the judges were appointment by Trump himself, they're not going to go against his agenda.
no, he didn't. he still fucking cucked out though.
We gained more gun rights under Obama than under Trump
this
all real gun owners know not all gun control is a bad thing
Obama tried to take guns away from people on NEETbux you retard
It is pretty interesting desu, there isn't a group as cucked in existence as gun owners, considering the potential power we have
>gun owners
>pushback
Can't hurt our precious optics
Stop autistically fixating on bump stocks and take up arms (in minecraft) against red flag laws
>implying NEETs should be armed
>implying NEETs have rights
>implying NEETs are even human beings
Fuck off
Just wait, braces are next then semi autos and magazines
how long till america becomes yurop but with hispanics and blacks instead of arabs and afghanis?
Obama also tried to ban civilians from any form of body armor.
Obama also tried getting an AWB through
>how long
when was the last time you were in public.
>We gained more gun rights under Obama than under Trump
Such as?
Will not comply.
I don't recall majority of gun owners saying they were against bump stock ban i.e. fudds and nra members. The few who said they would, then sure berate those folks.
>it's already precedent
it isn't even written yet, so how could there have been a legal test to set precedent? oh, right, you have no idea what that word means.
This 420D chess is getting out of hand.
we have lost more under drumpf then obama.
>molot gone
>bump stocks gone
>fix nics signed barring 40,000 people from their 2A rights.
le based maga emperior.
The problem with a bump stock ban is that it’s impossible to ban bump stocks without banning belt loops and fingers or all semi-automatic weapons.
shit was just signed into law bro
>it's not even written
where you been the last 8 months.
Why are you guys bitching. Just look in your closet.
D
I
A
S
>precedent
>untested law not in effect for 3 months
dude, are you really that stupid?
>the wording on the bill boils down to "the semi autos were shooting too fast so we legislated"
How long before assault fingers are regulated by l*ftoids with hammers
You have 90 days to surrender that ass, Mr Lawman.
You said nothing that *can* be proven wrong. Your response was so airy and non-committal that it lacked enough substance to respond to. You did not make a single claim that could be verified or disproved by *any* event occurring or information discovered. Your comment was the argumentative equivalent of ghost turds, insubstantial and utterly useless.
Who needs one when you have a closet full of machine guns?
youtube.com
mag bans are constitutional
assault weapons bans are constitutional
where's the line in the sand? Open carrying a 10 round pistol?
It’s not an executive order retard, Whittaker did it
SURRENDER YOUR BELT LOOPS, SHORTS, AND SUNTAN
i'm thinking more along the lines of you'll only be allowed to own overunder shotguns or single-shot bolt-action if you have a very good reason to do so, and open/concealed carry will be outright banned
Here we fucking go.
Even if SCOTUS decides to intervene what makes you think for a second they’ll do anything about it? Remember that those are people Trump put in, and Trump seemed pretty damn adamant to get rid of bump stocks.
No we didn’t, it just made people more alert of any gun bans since his name had a D right by it. No one gives a shit if it’s a Republican though, case in point Reagan.
HOW LONG
NOT LONG
CUZ WHAT YOU REAP
IS WHAT YOU SOW
UUUUUUUUUGHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
you used to term precedent to refer to legally untested law. I'm saying you don't know what the word precedent means.
thanks for your opinion bro.
>molot gone
but thas was obama.
didn't one of his appointees just immediately go in and start differing with him? That's rhetorical, they did.
>deflecting the original argument
O R A N G E M A N B A D
That’s just like, your opinion, man.
that was KC, molot was drumpfs doing.
he thinks he's gonna overturn a bump stock ban
you either have to die in a firefight against jackboot officials or hope to claim civil disobedience and have a based judge rule in favor of your constitutional rights.
en.wikipedia.org
either way you're fucked. boogaloo 2 when?
Nobody in the gov is truly pro gun. Nobody is gonna save us.
I plan to die in a firefight while claiming civil disobedience
see you in Valhalla faggot
critical mass when?
Not complying basically means I am already guilty of possessing an illegal machine gun... So really what difference does it make now, might as well convert my rifles to full auto the right way and drill those third holes.
What kind of schizoid shit is this?
Y- you too
For now anyway...
Die in a swamp, how was that not apparent to you?
>"I sold it to someone for cash, no I do not have their info. Now excuse me, I have a boating trip planned I need to prepare for. Good day."
>critical mass
>lol you guys are retards bump stocks aren't going anywhere!
>lol you guys are retards, it's just bump stocks!
>The duality of man
>Mfw buying one just to not comply
>not making machine guns since they carry the same punishment
Will we see any pro-2A legislation of importance pass congress withen our lifetime? This is a serious question.
>this passes
>R's realize they dont have to pretend to be progun anymore
>fast forward
>super duper extra bad tragedy happens
>involves salty gats
>R's back AWB 2.0 (under a different name so its totally different)
>ReaganTierFuddSpeak.mp3
>claim its for muh national security
>slip in grandfather clause,
>clause is supposedly """generous""' as it also allows for transfer of preban gats
>'i got mine' mentality sets in
>a few lone wolves go full retard but mostly no one does anything
>sperg shootings go out of style, some other moral panic trend starts
>crime continues its already steady decline
>AWB2.0 is falsely given credit for both and sunset clause removed
>Canadian style laws before the end of the 2020s
>we all pretend to still be free because of the tens of millions of preban gats floating around and because new mags have a 10rd limit instead of 5rds.
How accurate will my prediction be anons?
>virtue signaling to people who werent and arent going to vote for you
>meanwhile alienating people who were going to vote for you
Makes perfect sense.
Heller, and eventually reciprocity.
We might get some crumbs and pieces, like more cc reciprocity or something, but significant (pro) change? Unlikely
I won't be living to see this, you forgot that part but otherwise spot on.
What do you mean Heller? I said congress not the old hope that the SCOTUS can do anything other than start a constitutional crises by saying banning guns or standard cap magazines is kosher
>wimen and millennials are the fastest growing gun owning demographics
On a scale from correct to moron I rate you predictions clinically retarded.
Smart thinking, but If you were to make tons of full autos I'd think the feds would want to arrest you more than just having one piece of plastic.
If the feds come for me though we're breaking out the full auto seers
>that pic
Are those for sale?
Basically 100%
That places like Texas and Flordia have fallen to the anti-gun rhetoric should clearly signal where things are going.
>be me
>bought one for shits and giggles a few months back
>ff to today
>shit's banned
>have srcap black plastic laying about
>start whittling it down into a box
>throw in an old rubber stock pad and some nuts&bolts
>if/when I get a knock, show them the box and inform them I have destroyed it
Not that fucking hard.
any way to change tread to fart?
Sadly the original artist only sold them for like 24 hours and hasnt said a word about them again.
Best you can do is take the original art and get a custom print