Ok you niggers, what is the difference between a bump stock and a binary trigger?
Since all of you want to say X is better, which one is it?
Im gonna get one for a .22 before the ban and Id like to know which one has better functionality
Binary triggers and bump stocks
Justin Nelson
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
justice.gov
twitter.com
Hunter Long
Binary triggers are unlikely to be banned. Buy at will.
Carson Jackson
Pretty sure those are included in the new ban
Jeremiah Thompson
>bump stock
bounces your entire arm back and forth to pull the trigger repeatedly as long as you hold on tight
>binary trigger
pulling the trigger shots once, releasing the trigger shoots once
Daniel Williams
>unlikely to be banned
HAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Whew lad.
Hunter Collins
i dont know how well a binary would work with a 22lr, but let me tell you my experience with the bumpstock. it works well but since 22lr has so little recoil, you have to go super light with the gun itself. i was using a 16" m4 profile barre (i would have preferred a lighter profile but that is what i have), no handguard, no muzzle device, and a trijicon rmr.
next, the trigger also has to be very light. i got it working somewhat reliably with a geissele sd3g trigger.
Alexander Butler
You're not a slave to the government. They can't legislate your rights away.
Do not register anything with the government.
Do not apply for anything with the government.
Do not talk to the government.
Do not contract with the government.
Do not tell the government what you are doing about anything.
They're hostile to you and your rights. Start treating them as such.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137
The Constitution for these united States is the Supreme Law of the Land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law and effect from its inception.
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 US 105
No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.
"A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by Federal constitution". at 113, (1943).
Shuttlesworth v.Birmingham , 373 US 262
If a State converts a liberty into a privilege the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.
Miller v. US, 230 F 486: "The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime."
"There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights." Sherer v. Cullen, 481 F 946
Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22: "The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice."
Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60: "Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void."
None of the above is even necessary. Gun grabbers are treasonous hypocrites and liars, swearing an oath to the constitution and then turning right around and violating it at every turn.
"An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery."
-State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260
Cooper Torres
"Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense."
-State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100
"One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance."
-Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910
.
"These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence."
-Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I
-Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75
-Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
Luke Miller
Saved
Carter Wright
It would be impossible to regulate without classifying every semi-automatic as an automatic weapon. That would be unconstitutional.
justice.gov
Stop trolling.
Benjamin Bennett
Rubberbands are gtg
Samuel Perez
I'd say the binary would be far easier to shoot accurately with, bump fire is not exactly precise. It is fun though, so it just depends what you are after.
Jason Wilson
>>that would be unconstitutional
>every gun law is unconstitutional
they don't care
Ethan Nelson
>pulling the trigger shots once, releasing the trigger shoots once
They've had these for paintball guns since forever.
Zachary Morgan
What if I work for the government though?
Jace Perry
Of course the ATF cares. If they made an unconstitutional rule the whole Federal government could be pulled apart by (((lawyers))).
Wyatt Walker
I guess they never miss
Anthony Phillips
The (((lawyers))) are on their side user. Liberal lawyers become judges who engage in judicial activism and tear the whole system into their realm.
Mason Jones
You can enjoy simple explanations of shadowy conspiracies, but if the last decade has shown me anything it is that poor lawmaking without any respect to the constitution will be picked apart one Federal judge at a time.
If the entirety of the nation's privately held semi-automatic, revolvers and autoloaders had to be destroyed because they were not registered prior to 1986 it would be the kind of legal nightmare that would tear apart the entire NFA.
Charles Wood
It's not a conspiracy, retard. It's just leftist judges putting more opinion into their rulings than they should. Take a look at the 9th circuit court of appeals and tell me they're not engaging in judicial activism.
There are dozens of peices of unconstitutional gun law all around the country that have been on the books for decades without anyone doing a God damned thing about it, in court or otherwise.
Connor Bell
Ok you go think that if the ATF declared any manually loading firearm a machine-gun or at the least readily convertible that there would not need to either be an immediate legislative fix or a judicial fix to make sure that does not happen.
>There are dozens of peices of unconstitutional gun law all around the country that have been on the books for decades without anyone doing a God damned thing about it, in court or otherwise.
Great, go put together an argument explaining why they are unconstitutional and get it before a judge. We have a system of laws you know.
Carter Morgan
you mean the same way they just said bump stocks made a gun a machine gun after explicitly stating the exact opposite in 2010 or so?
Ayden Richardson
>Great, go put together an argument explaining why they are unconstitutional and get it before a judge
>Hurrdurr the judges are always right and actually give a shit about the law! They don't have an agenda!
Go be a boot licker somewhere else
Mason Taylor
>liberal
whew laddy! Daddy Orangetoadstool is making murica great!
Anthony Martinez
Or maybe like how in 2006 they said in very non-specific ways how the Atkins accelerator was a machine gun? Or how the Hellfire trigger could also be considered a machinegun? Or what about the DIAS and pre-1982 open bolt nonsense? Shoelace machine gun (Somehow this is now legal with rubber bands if ATF is to be believed)?
ATF was given two sentences and immense amounts of pressure from Congress who has failed to do their job and constitutional role since the 1934 NFA was originally passed!
Keep not complying 3per. Eventually if you decide to join the rest of us who are bitter clingers you will discover that if a judge decides to ignore an argument without justification then you can appeal to a higher body or even shop for a venue favorable to your argument.
Jeremiah Torres
>Peruta v. San Diego County
The system doesn't work
Lincoln Hall
>Just need to pack the courts enough to get 5-4 rulings
>Implying divisive cases always make it to the supreme court
Fuck off roberts
Eli Sanchez
That law isnt good anymore. Congress has legislated it away
Blake Reed
>Vote for Trump because he will protect guns and loosen laws
>Bans bump stocks
What the fuck is this fucking retard doing?
Daniel Russell
What Russia wants.
Join us and wash yourself of responsibility
Wyatt Roberts
Yep binary triggers are excluded from the ban page 83. For now at least.
Jordan Morris
He thinks he can negotiate with leftists for some reason. Also the president probably doesn't have as much power as we would like to think. I'm amazed that he's gotten as much done as he's already has.
Carson Harris
Nothing for negatives to his base?
Dylan Long
Then you're a faggot
Ayden Lopez
They're already banned in Maryland...
Logan Martin
This. Does anyone know how much of government is actually elected and how much of it is career sycophants?