*cements Soviet armoured superiority in the 70s*
*cements Soviet armoured superiority in the 70s*
Aiden Baker
Jackson Miller
*cements Western superiority for entire Cold War*
Daniel Russell
Vatnik asshurt,
Proofs for the hen,
First post best post once again.
Matthew Torres
no
Easton Wright
*Cements Western air supremacy in the 70s, continuing to this day*
Carson Barnes
>*cements Soviet armoured superiority in the 70s*
Wrong
Jaxson Adams
*cements American infantry superiority in the 80s and 90s*
Ian Richardson
>continuing until this day
FIFY
Christopher Gomez
I'm starting to doubt a lot of claims of the Soviets when it comes to their equipment
For instance Kontakt-5 (and its more modern replacements) is suppose to defeat APFSDS rounds. But looking at the developement of Soviet Technology I think their own APFSDS rounds weren't capable of going through ERA plates to begin with. I mean at the Time Kontakt-5 was being worked on they also worked on Tandem Missiles launched from Tank barrels for the sole purpose of defeating ERA, which means the APFSDS rounds they gave to their tankers had a hard time going through ERA plates. However in the West they never bothered with that because all testing showed that their APFSDS rounds sliced through ERA with no problems.
Anthony Baker
>I'm starting to doubt a lot of claims of the Soviets when it comes to their equipment
Just now?
Cooper Lewis
>J-20
>confirmed by India and Real China(Taiwan) to be non stealthy
Yeah, the F-15 still reigns supreme.
Easton Edwards
ROFL, American infantry hasn't been the best, ever.
Those gun-launched missiles were meant against helicopters and very distant targets.
The Russians emphasised HEAT shells for AT work anyway, the less versatile APFSDS was less important most of the time.
Western tank tech was bothered enough by Russian (heavy) ERA that completely new APFSDS concepts, lots of tandem shaped charges and a 120 mm L/55 gun were developed.
You sound like you have very superficial info on tanks. I recommend Ogorkiewicz' "Technology of Tanks" as starter literature, and Rolf Hilmes' "Kampfpanzer" if you can read German.
>>J-20
>>confirmed by India and Real China(Taiwan) to be non stealthy
>Yeah, the F-15 still reigns supreme.
Civilian air traffic controllers in Europe have confirmed that the F-22 isn't stealthy at all.
Such reports mean nothing. LO and VLO aircraft use luneburg lenses in peacetime to increase their RCS.
Ian Turner
I beg your pardon?
Colton Jenkins
Luke Turner
Ethan Roberts
Ironic enough it was a development of that tank that failed to save the USSR from collapse in the 1991 coup d'état attempt.
Mason Gomez
I don't see how it really matters which model of tank is shooting at your white house, seems like it's a pretty clear sign of collapse
Christian Thomas
Nolan White
>Those gun-launched missiles were meant against helicopters
No, just... no.
Parker Thompson
>Implying Quality matters when you can Zerg your enemy with mass produced shit
>Not like the Americans did something similar during the second world war.
Adrian Peterson
>Implying Quality matters when you can Zerg your enemy with mass produced shit
"JUST RUSH'EM" doesn't really work when you're stuck with an anachronistic ground-intercept system and your pilots don't have nearly as many flight hours as the enemy. The Americans during the second world war smashed the Luftwaffe because they had better aircraft for the job at hand, more planes than the enemy, and loads of pilots with plenty of training.
Brayden Cruz
>implying you can zerg when you only have one carrier with no way to service it
Charles Barnes
Fpbp
Evan Sullivan
who would win
>the result of several decades of tank design
>some wierd stick
Isaac White
>Digits
Nicholas Rivera
Fuck, that's a beautiful plane
That motherfucker is loaded for bear
Luis Gonzalez
>several decades old tank design
lets be realistic here
Luke Campbell
>armoured superiority
Tanks were only useful in WW1 to get over trenches without being shot.
From then on they were just memes, like battleships. A complete liability.
Wyatt Lee
>t. Baghdad Bob