Holy shit, the madman did it

No you won't. The quip about it not being an AR is at the very end of a 30 min video of finger fucking a Neato gun.

I still haven't been able to tell if these posters are meaning to say that Ian is an actual communist/socialist or if its a euphemism and they take issue with some other specific perceived fault, or if its just pure buzzword. He seems appreciative of soviet guns on a mechanical and design level, but it never struck me as political.

It's kids throwing words around without thinking about it, they're just looking to see what gets some reaction and then they'll spam the shit out of that.

I hope to see an end of the fedorov shitposting era.

the soviets used them more than the T*arists ever did

He already had a video on the fedorov, disassembling it and all though. Granted it's an old one but still.

The Soviets also drank water doesn't make the water communist you gay ass memer, go back to fucking /v/.

This one he bothers to tell us the history.

user, the Fedarov is not an assault rifle, 6.5 Arisaka is a full rifle caliber, just a wimpy one.

The tsar did nothing wrong

also this

6.5 Gook is weaker than some AR calibers. If we count rifle cartridge as something fired out of a rifle than .22LR can never be considered a pistol round.

INTERMEDIATE is a relative term. And in the context of both the Imperial and Soviet armies 6.5 is inbetween 7.62 Nagant and 7.62x54 Rimmed as well as 7.62 Tok.

Was the Federov designed in 1913 or 2018?

Attached: VERY fast Ian assembling at incredible hihg speed.webm (576x320, 2.92M)

It's a bunch of Jow Forums shitposters who decided that because Ian didn't want political shitpost filling the comments of his Rhodesian FAL video he's now a communist and a member of antifa.

Designed matters not. Assault Rifle is a technical term not a doctrinal or design term.

He does see himself as a liberal and denying the white genocide in South Afrika is a daft move.

Tell me how many intermediate rounds there were in 1913. Tell me the state of affairs Imperial Japan was in. Tell me why their main service calibers were as shitty as they were. Tell me why some shit dick 100 years later can't get over the simple fact that a dead round that was used as a rifle round and nothing more is now cause for grave concern over it's validity of being an assault rifle or not. Tell me.

>Tell me why their main service calibers were as shitty as they were.
because japs are intermediate humans?

>Tell me how many intermediate rounds there were in 1913
So if I made an AR firing 30-30 and it would be select fire that would be a Battle Rifle/Automatic Rifle not an Assault rifle?
> more is now cause for grave concern
Why are you being soo butthurt about a simple argument?

Is 30-30 a rifle round or an intermediate round?
>butthurt
Ah so you're new hear, glad to see a bright shiny face in the crowd. Since you didn't know this argument is had once a month every month and has been going on since 2004. Glad I was able to catch you up to speed.

>Is 30-30 a rifle round or an intermediate round?
Well answer faggot.
>Ah so you're new hear, glad to see a bright shiny face in the crowd
Been here for 6 years faggot.

Rimmed, .30 cal, typically used in rifles, first designed to be used in rifles. Yeah rifle round.
>6 years
Oh wow, you're so cool user. Certified internet tough guy.

>first designed to be used in rifles
So is the American 180 a Battle rifle/Automatic Rifle or an SMG?

Kek

Attached: 20181221_220152.jpg (1080x297, 32K)

One of his favourite firearms, as per a recent Q&A, is his TT-33.

>Nearly identical performance to 7.62x39

.22lr would fall into the category of sporting round. It also has found wide use in both pistols and rifles.

Is that Arin?

>.22lr would fall into the category of sporting round
It was first designed to be fired out of a Rifle.

It was, thanks to it not dying we have the ability to claim it as a sporting round. Can you please point out the Tikka hanging on the wall in 6.5 jap?

>It was, thanks to it not dying we have the ability to claim it as a sporting round.
Weather or not now it's used in Sporting practices and out of handguns it was originally designed as a Rifle round.

It was, and it's still around to be pimped into any form that'll take it. 6.5 jap however died in 1945 for all intents and purposes. And funnily enough it died as a rifle round since at the time it was considered to be a rifle round. From this we can also state that 6.5 Federovs died at the same time being no longer produced thus cementing them as an automatic rifle that fired a rifle round.

>And funnily enough it died as a rifle round since at the time it was considered to be a rifle round.
When a round died doesn't matter. Assault Rifle is a technical term with a clear cut definition. Intermediate is a relative term with a very soft definition. In the context of the of the Imperial army 6.5 Arisaka is in between, or intermediate to the pistol and rifle round of the time.
May I remind you that 5.56 did not start as an intermediate round. .223 Remington was originally used in rifles.

Alright sick, by your metric 10mm is a rifle round then.

Considering some 10mm loads can run as hot as some smaller and weaker intermediate loading, sure.

Also Assault Rifle is an American term. And in other nations and language it doesn't exist and anything that isn't a full sized Machine gun is seen as a Submachine gun.

Interesting, the safety sear/auto sear is the ejector.

Yes, because it was coined by the M16 then retroactively applied to the AK and has been cemented in history ever since. It's a neat technical term that helps differentiate between Rifle (grenade) Rifle (bolt/sniper) Rifle (DMR) Rifle (select fire/assault).

American weapon desginations have always been a bit shit. I mean look at the M4 or M3.

You can't tell the difference between a carbine and a SMG?

Or a Tank, A carbine, A shotgun, A cannon, A tractor and a Survival Rifle.

Kind of why you go with the description after them. Context is also key. Same reason you don't shop by bar code number instead of using your eyeballs.

is that Chris Pontius

The fact that 2 Heavy Vehicles, 1 Cannon which could be mounted on other vehicles and 2 Infantry weapons share the designation is not a good thing.

Context, when you're talking about armor and say M3 people are not imagining a lone smg taking out an emplaced weapon position. Same as when you ask if there are any M3 magazines laying around someone doesn't pull a shell rack for a tank out of their ruck. Context is key and hard to understand for those who are on the spectrum. If that gives you any idea as why you're having such trouble grasping this beyond simple concept.

There's quite clearly a doctrine behind assault rifles

He pals around with a satanist

>Context is key and hard to understand for those who are on the spectrum.
Imagine the context of being a supply officer or doing any mass paper work. In that context having too much shit share the same designation is bad. You probably would know that if ever came into contact with actual book keeping. Something about 380 Glocks comes to mind.

Nigger

Attached: DUUUAUAUUH.jpg (84x70, 6K)

Generally why there's a different supply officer for motorpool vs arms. Whereas the Submachine Gun, Cal. .45, M3 is pretty hard to mix up with the Medium Tank, M3. The casual reference for either would be "M3" while the contextual or documented name for them would be as above.

My own two cents is that 6.5x5mm SR is not an intermediate round. It was used in rifles and machine guns, the latter is where the pressure was reduced. It was that pressure reduction that was appealing for Fedorov when the 7.62x54R was too much and where his own attempt at a 6.5mm round failed.
The Fedorov would also need to have been considered as being the standard issue weapon for infantry. Not something only one in a squad got and where they needed an assistant gunner to give them mags.
I think Ian summed it up best: It's an automatic rifle, but one where it was primarily intended for semi-auto fire.

>Generally why there's a different supply officer for motorpool vs arms
There's more to logistics than just the guy trying to place an order.
Besides this is a document issue as multiple times during WW2 there have been request to change designations of certain items, usually chaining them from M3 and M4 to something else.

Real talk, is Karl legitimately a Satanist? I mean with all the Ian antifa images it's pretty obvious they're just shitty shops but the picture of Karl at the satanist meetings look pretty legit, plus he's enough of an edgelord looking guy that I'd buy it.

Also if a supply officer were absolutely terrible at his job and an order got sent in for 20 M3s it would undoubtedly get sent back or the clerk would laugh for ever thinking of the notion of sending 20 75mm gun motor carriages to an infantry platoon along with several crates of .45 acp.

>Not something only one in a squad got and where they needed an assistant gunner to give them mags.
The STG-44 was given to only 1 guy per Squad or even just 1 per Platoon and was used to supplement the firepower of the squad MG. While the Fedorov was used to supplement the battalion MG as it was deployed per Battalion.

There is no qhite genocide in sa

The Karl being a Satanist is confirmed. Tho it's not devil worshiping it's just being an edgy faggot atheist.

Which is why you'd probably specify Submachine Gun, Cal. .45, M3 which is the technical term for the item. Kind of like how you organize species with taxonomic ranks. Whereas you would not ask for 10 M3s to be built you would ask for 10 GMC, M3s to be built.

Give it a couple of months.

bla bla

Not all communication was so specific. Especially if it was something over telegraph or coded. That's anyway besides the point as it was an issue that had to be addressed and we are seeing the results of it being adressed. There were plans to have 2 more light tanks be called M3 as well as another medium tank being called M4 which was probably the biggest brain fart in naming convention.

The purpose of the StG-44 was to make it the standard issue weapon for as many soldiers as possible. So every infantryman could deliver effective suppressing fire and also engage at most ranges; instead of having a powerful rifle be cumbersome at close range and a submachine gun be useless at far range.
During field trials the StG-44 wasn't given to one person. It was given to entire units so the nature of the German infantry squad could shift away from having the riflemen support the machine gun crew.

Honestly it barely surprises me, Karl really does give off a huge "I'm a massive autist" vibe like 90% of the time.

Yeah it kind of was, another thing you've been skipping over big time is context. What would an infantry platoon need a crate of M3 tanks for? Why would we need to worry about the direction and location of a several sub machineguns and if they could provide an artillery barrage from their current position. You've got the autism hard my friend.

Considering that a major political party in SA has showed plans to remove the livelihood of a large part of the White population in SA, by force if need be and there have been multiple targeted attacks on whites the point at which you call it genocide is drawing near.

They are just taking their land back ;D

I can see it now
>we need covering fire from those M4s over there
>sir we cannot for those are M4A3E2s and not M4s

>The purpose of the StG-44 was to make it the standard issue weapon for as many soldiers as possible
The combat doctrine that was implemented for the StG-44 was support of the MG, especially when the MG was reloading or chaining barrels and was done by one or two troopers.
> It was given to entire units
Units as in Divisions not as in a squad got to run around with 6 StGs.

>What would an infantry platoon need a crate of M3 tanks for?
Not everything was done at Platoon level. You are just trying to boil down things to a level that suits you, not to reality.
>You've got the autism hard my friend.
>Le autism may may

Man if I had a nickle for every time someone accidentally loaded a stick magazine full of 75mm instead of 9mm I'd be rich. Oh and the amount of goofy logistics boys that tried to put a halftrack into a crate? Priceless. Don't even get me started on my friend who accidentally got a 76mm cannon instead of a carbine in Afghanistan.

So a squad of infantry who hadn't had a lick of armored experience in their life would get 4 tanks on a whim? Damn. That's impressive.

No but an infantry regiment could have issues with both a vehicle they use and a gun they use having the same designation. And so could a tank unit since their tank, their service weapon and their support half track share the same designation. And you will not use a full description every single time and you can't do that in all contexts.

So then if I wanted a track for my M3 gmc instead of asking for a track for the M3 which was supplied out to me I'd just go to a supply officer, yell "M3" and walk away? Man you sure do have a queer sense of how normal people interact don't you?

Nigger this was a documented issue. Stop trying to be a faggot you already showed everyone you are a champion at sucking dick.

Right, the track is loose on my submachinegun, think you're the man for the job to get it fixed supply clerk user? While you're at it the diesel engine attached to it is sounding funny can we get it looked at?

Attached: 1544114460475.jpg (960x956, 44K)

Hey, while you're at it, the buttstock on my M4 broke, can you get me a replacement Continental R975-C1 in mint condition from 80 years ago? Thanks buddy.

For someone calling others autistic you are sure on one hell of a sperg out.

I mean I don't confuse tanks for smgs, that's on you guy.

I wonder if some of them are actually /leftypol/ trying to appropriate Ian

Nigger this isn't even the subject at hand. And bookkeeping is more than just ordering spare parts you fucking faggot. Plus you are the sperg that started name dropping engines thinking he has his big boi pants on.

Sure whatever guy just send a diesel truck my non mechanized platoon is low on ammo for their M3s.

>My M3 is being supported by an M3 and we lost an M3 but I still have my M3 on me.

Also, reductio ad absurdum
>dropping engine names is autistic
Are you incapable of using google? Shit son the page will give you the amount of bolts that went into an M4. It's not cherished knowledge.

Why are 280 British guns considered intermediate and the Fed not? The Jap chambering of this gun is nearly identical in muzzle energy to 280.

>Are you incapable of using google?
>He is googiling components for shitposting

Attached: 1540771036929.png (1024x749, 196K)

Man o man to see the day when you lose an smg to AT. Wew laddeh.

Aww can't argue back so he posts stale memes. Pottery.

>Implying any of those M3s were SMGs.

>Pottery
Talk about stale. What do you want me to find a peer review study about why you are gay?

Sure buddy, go drive your submachine gun off a cliff while you're at it.