Impressive

Impressive.

Attached: 001(1).jpg (1200x900, 202K)

Other urls found in this thread:

thediplomat.com/2018/08/russia-will-not-mass-produce-t-14-armata-main-battle-tank/
amp.timeinc.net/thedrive/the-war-zone/22600/russia-cant-afford-its-new-t-14-armata-tanks-turns-to-updated-older-designs-instead?source=dam
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Here Vassili, have a extra Ruble for Christmas

we celebrate Christmas in January

Christmas is in 13 days.

It's also "an" extra.

>cardboard turret fails under stray 60mm mortar splinter
> tank becomes blind, without aps and with shredded autoloader

Sad!

>nigger loader drops a round
>it blows up and destroys the Abrams

The first happen often, the second half applies only to Rußian ammo depots :^)

Japan: Korean Destroyer locked targeting radar on Japanese Patrol airplane.
Korea: Please don't announce it officially.
Japan: We refuse.
Korea: We didn't use targeting radar.
Japan: We have evidence.
Korea: We were performing routine operation.
Japan: It's aginst the international rule.
Korea: We were searching for North Korean wrecked ship.
Japan: It was completely different from searching radar.
and the wrecked ship was in the air?
Korea: We used radar but it wasn't FCS.
Japan: It was FCS absolutely.
Korea: As we got terrible weather, we used the all radars we have.
Japan: It was very sunny day.
Korea: Japan airplane came into the FCS only for a moment.
Japan: It was 5 minutes.
Korea: Japanese airplane took an attitude of threatening.
Japan: We just patroled our territory.
Korea: Don't blame us for minor things. Prime minister Abe wants to get public favor.
Japan: Why did you igonre our radio communication.
Korea: Radio comunication didn't work well.
Japan: Just in case, we used 3 radio frequencies.

>halts production
Yes very

>literally didn't happen

>The first happen often
As often as my scenario.

>trying to say it didint

thediplomat.com/2018/08/russia-will-not-mass-produce-t-14-armata-main-battle-tank/

amp.timeinc.net/thedrive/the-war-zone/22600/russia-cant-afford-its-new-t-14-armata-tanks-turns-to-updated-older-designs-instead?source=dam

>“Why flood our military with Armatas, the T-72s are in great demand on the markets,” the deputy prime minister saidnoting that the upgraded variant of the T-72 “leaves far behind”German, French and U.S. MBTs currently in service “in terms of price, efficiency and quality.” Furthermore, Borisov noted, when discussing the government’s decision to modernize older armor platforms:“Having a military budget ten times smaller than that of NATO, we are achieving our objectives due to such efficient solutions.”

Meh

Im a russiaboo and I prefer the T-72/90 builds

They will still produce 500 of them and put them in the most elite tank brigades.

They will upgrade the T-80 and T-90 using technologies from the T-14, so Russia will have 6000+ modern MBTs by 2025. Enough to conquer Europe three times in a row.

Attached: maxresdefault (79).jpg (1280x720, 194K)

Europe here. We have enought aids and muslims already. We dont need russia to "liberate" us with more of it

An Abrams knockoff?

Ok, it was just hypothetical argument anyway.

[spoiler]The tanks are actually to deal with China.[/spoiler]

Nice false flagging, goy

Now that the T-14 Armata heavy tank is the new world leader in main battler tanks, will the US paper tiger finally be crushed for once and all?

Attached: T14 Armata Russian Main Battle Tank.jpg (720x389, 23K)

the Western capitalist pig-dogs will be shaking in there boots

Attached: maxresdefault (2).jpg (1280x720, 165K)

Also Europe here, please nuke us Russia.

We can't nuke white people and the people who buy our gas. Russia needs Europe.

>We can't nuke white people and the people who buy our gas
Americans don't buy our gas, and aren't people, let alone white. Can we nuke them?

Do You want all the wealth of Comrade Putin evaporated? Because He doesn't.

>tanks
>conquering anything
>in 2018 not to mention 2025

2018 was a disastrous year for the vatniks of Jow Forums

Okay, then please go to Лa Maнш like you used to plan to do!

>They will still produce 500 of them
Which when adjusted for russian propaganda means 50 or so will be made and the rest will be obsolete T-72+++, all of which will be turned into burning wrecks when faced with anything better than arabs with RPG-7s.
Poland alone could stop russia.

Attached: 1538679285506.jpg (736x514, 135K)

Because Russia has NEVER had a track record of falsifying production of military equipment to seem like a larger threat instead of a paper tiger

O B S E S S E D
B
S
E
S
S
E
D

Attached: yesyesyes.jpg (1017x1017, 243K)

Why? Because Russia prefers building new roads, new sidewalks, new skyscrapers over mass producing weapons of war and inundating their population with debts like the Americans do?

And a new system for Moscow Centr Water Park; marvel of engineering - filters out up to 89,7% solid human waste.

Attached: 352x500.jpg (179x200, 18K)

Impressive

>They will still produce 500 of them and put them in the most elite tank brigades.

How is this going to work?
>special tank brigades with T-14, T-15, etc
>tank brigades with T-90, BMP, etc
>motor rifle brigades with T-72B, BTR or its replacement, etc
???

the t-14 will run up against the same issue as the legendary panther tanks where they got zerg rushed by t-34.

Attached: churchills in italy.jpg (2000x1474, 759K)

What? Itll shatter its transmission, break down all the time, be embarrassingly unarmored on the sides, overly large for its classification and have a horrendously slow turret? Panther sounds surprisingly Russian to me

That's bc you're a retarded.
Cope.

Come at me

Attached: 1544617710553.jpg (3572x1492, 640K)

>It's another "Russia remakes a cold-war prototype design and pretends it'll go into service this time" episode
Implessive indeed.

>It's another Russia ends up cancelling the project but tries to play it off like they never needed it in the first place and that their current tanks are just fine against NATO and USA episode
These always make me laugh desu