Are you ready Jow Forums?

Probably the opposite of that

>conservative judges are gonna go gun grabber

Strict scrutiny is the hope according to some pro gun analysts IIRC

>MUH MAGICALLY MYSTICAL REPEATING RANDOM DIGITS!!!!!!!!!!!! IT MUST MEAN ITS TRUE!!!!!!!
this is the worst meme on this site and it always has been. people start posting shit like "OMMGGGG SOROS WILL DIE AND HILLARY WILL GET AIDS!!!" whenever you can clearly see the post numbers are nearing the next large set of sequential digits

>Slate
>hyperbole out the ass because guns are scary to vegan yoga instructors

>>board about one of the most Jow Forumsitical issues in USA
last I checked this is a board about objects, not issues faggot

yes, they probably will

Neck yourself faggot. Lurk more before posting again retard or get off this board

>gun ownership is not political issue
I bet you like BASED LEFTIST GUN OWNERS too.

>hurr durr lurk more
>hurrrr you said something i dont like you must be a newfag
make a triforce in 30 seconds faggot

No, this headline is retarded grabber fearmongering. This is a challenge to a NYC law that makes it illegal to take your legally owned guns anywhere but home, range, gunsmith, and gun store. The goal of the suit is to make it legal to take your guns to, for example, a second residence. It’s pretty narrow, it’s only news because the SC hasn’t granred cert to a gun case since McDonald.

strict scrutiny isn't actually that difficult to pass.

t. attorney user

It was 1934 though

▲

▲ ▲

>implying Roberts won't cuck out in order to "preserve the prestige of the Court"

this, most are expecting a pretty narrow ruling

FUCKING KEK. nice try redditor

Attached: 1511954978674.png (596x628, 310K)

>get ready for guns to be everywhere
I can only get so erect

the empty space characters got shoah'ed a long time ago

It seems that by saying you can take your guns to another residence you can transport your guns regardless of where that might be.

Beat me to it

Attached: 20190128_121033.jpg (800x663, 212K)

You fucking nigger. That wasn't me. You're samefagging to try to save face.

oh god please
I want to be an american so hard right now

Attached: super-cagnotte-euromillions-1er-fevrier-2019.jpg (940x586, 156K)

Both of you stop LARPing as me
Your a fucking faggot go back

Last time I checked, this thread is about laws concerning weapons. Would you go to Jow Forums if a jurisdiction was going to ban anime to learn more, or would you go to /a/?

>board is about physical objects
>shit up the board by posting screenshots from fucking slate
>get called out
>oh why do they persecute me so?

If the outcome isn't constitutional carry, then I don't care

I'm so glad to hear at least somebody in this world can fully enjoy they pewmachines.

Attached: 1548699366882.jpg (1054x620, 190K)

Didn't the 9th Circuit (of all places) recently rule that open carry is a right?

>open carry
Who cares

>OMG guys the SCOTUS is hearing a 2A case finally!
>NFA is gonna get repealed and everyone gets a free machine gun and suppressor ( will be paid for by Mexico)

It's seriously over some cuck regulation in NY about where they can bring/store their guns. People are acting like this is some big thing, it's not.

It can lead up to bigger things (like nullifying statewide AWBs and magazine capacity limits)

▲
▲▲
Wut do I win?

Attached: 1547892837132.jpg (480x403, 19K)

>can
won't

How and where they can bring and store their firearms, and what the court's opinion on the matter is can have an impact on how we all may carry, transport, and store our firearms. If not now, this opens the door to such a discussion in the future.

>setting pro-fun precedent isn’t a big deal

Anything short of SHALL NOT is not a pro-gun precedent

From my understanding, if the court rules against NYC, it's likely to be taken as a "you have a right to keep and bear arms outside the home". If the court rules for NYC, it's likely to be taken as a "you do not have the right to keep and bear arms outside the home." That's it.

ßßZ
ZßZ
beezlebubbeezlebubbeezlebub

Or, what most likely will happen is, "You have a right to keep and bear arms outside the home, BUT..."

▲
▲ ▲

I like that song too
youtube.com/watch?v=ZHVEqsyitwE

Attached: .dick.jpg (300x300, 14K)

Nah, the "but" will mostly come from New York who'll take the ruling and attempt to apply their own, but still constitutional, limitations to said ruling.

I don't see a "but" scenario in this. Yes, I'm being naïve about this.

Kek, confirmed for newfag. They nerf'd the triforce ages ago.

shouldn't you be in school?

Don't you have a feminist studies class to attend?

Anything preceding "but" in a political claim can be ignored
-Michael Malice

ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT

IM TRIGGERING YOU

ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT ELEPHANT

No, the most likely outcome is that you can travel with a gun to your own property or shooting range and that's all they'll specify. And it'll only apply inside your state of residence because interstate commerce blah blah blah.

It can, but it won't.

Pretty much. A victory on this case allows people to challenge laws in bullshit states like NJ where people get arrested for *traveling through* the state with unloaded guns in their trunks.

Ya'll need to read pagunblog he's good at analyzing these cases.

Gibs explanation pls

Attached: 1547696856868.jpg (520x853, 78K)

Wouldn't be the first time

read up on legal scrutiny my dude

>If I can't reclaim all my rights at once, I don't want any.
Wow you're a faggot.

Attached: 1547951949040.jpg (407x407, 12K)

The SCOTUS is the responsible for most of the bad things that have ruined this country including slavery, abortion, fag marriage, and making our kids go to school with redguards. I wouldn't put too much faith in them regardless of how many "conservative" judges are on the bench.

This. Our enemies are content with advancing incrementally (to the extent that their final goal lies generations ahead) towards their objective, and so must we be.

wtf is this shit?

ur so edgy bro!

You're already supposed to be able to do that though.
>law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/926A

t. Californian

Well, he's kind of correct. Incrementalism doesn't really work in our favor the way demographics are going. It would be easier to pass one big law or win one big court case than a dozen smaller ones in regards to immigration, gun rights, etc.

>random clickbait post on shitty news website about political thing that will happen months from now
>OH SHIT I BETTER GO POST THIS LINK ON Jow Forums - WEAPONS WITH ZERO DISCUSSION, THEY'LL LOVE ME AND SPEND TWO DAYS SINGING MY PRAISES
On behalf of the entire board, we wholeheartedly urge you to commit suicide before you do this again. This goes on /news/ or Jow Forums, but ideally it goes on /trash/. When something actually happens we'll have 15 spam threads about it but right now you're just shitting up the board even harder than the weekender crossboard kiddies from /v/.

Attached: carlin wtf.jpg (1280x720, 65K)

back to plebbit

>case wont be heard until october 2021

its nothing.

The 9th Circuit ruled that the 2nd Amendment protects a right to carry a firearm for self-defense, and thus you must either allow open or concealed carry, or both, but you can't prohibit carry entirely.

>supposed to be
that's the problem

>judges labeled as conservative solely because they're a little bit right of the left extreme
>one of which beats his dick to procedure so hard he will ignore precedent to toss something due to it not conforming to "how we do things"
>another so hung up on not stepping on the toes of previous rulings he'll bend over and take it if there's even the slightest hint of precedent
Better than 50% chance this goes the wrong way.

Checked, but there's no way RGB will last til then maybe this is a good thing?

▲
▲ ▲

Sotomayor is likely to retire before then as well.

>A victory on this case allows people to challenge laws in bullshit states like NJ where people get arrested for *traveling through* the state with unloaded guns in their trunks.
Until circuit courts ignore the decision and the USSC declines to take those appeals, letting the decision stand and effectively removing any "victory" had.

Back in the day....

_▲_
▲▲

I think Breyer dying/retiring is more likely to follow Ginsburg's death

My guess the most likely is that no state (or lower) government can stop you from transporting your guns. So you can basically keep a truck/trunk gun with you at all times no matter what state you are in.

I think the best case scenario would be the establishment of a level of scrutiny to be used when confronting the 2nd of strict. Right now the most common "used" (see cited by anti-gun judges) is intermediate, which was taken from RGB's descent to Heller.

It's a bitter pill to swallow but if you demand all or nothing then all you will get is nothing. We have to play the long game and we have to replace or outshine the NRA with a truly populist organization rather than professional activists. Never trust professional activists, especially when they say they're on your side. They are actively disincentivized from solving the problem because it means they'll be out a shitload of delicious donation shekels.

>everyone who isn't a lunatic Jow Forumsnigger is le reddit boogeyman
Begone, newfag spawn of 2016.

That behavior was largely Kennedy's fault. Now that he's been replaced by a justice who was publicly humiliated by the best-known gun-grabber in the country, we can reasonably expect that to change.

Attached: IMG_4194.jpg (636x1552, 286K)

The 9th is full of communist niggers that will rescind that precedent at the drop of a hat so don't get excited.

[spoiler][spoiler][/spoiler][/spoiler]

---ATTENTION---
Demoralization campaign active

Threadly reminder that a discord exists solely for the purpose of shitposting on Jow Forums, with specific targeting towards /ptg/ and /sg/. There exists a group of people who's life choices have led them to a point where shitposting on Jow Forums has become the highlight of their day, indeed their very reason for not just suckstarting the first shotgun they can find.

They are responsible for ---ALL--- AOC and Tulsi Gabbard threads. They create porn threads. They are responsible for the BLACKED spam. They are the ones creating the "Honest thoughts on X" threads, the "how do we solve the X problem" threads, the "What did X mean by this" threads, the blackpill threads, the consensus-breaking threads. The fake tweet threads. And above all anytime they are confronted they will immediately deny the existence of said Discord, despite multiple screencaps of it existing. They continue creating them because some of you simply cannot help yourselves when you see a shitpost and are unable to refrain from giving the shitposter a (You).

This is your reminder that each (You) you give them gives them a tiny bit of hope that their shitposting will change your mind, will affect your thinking. They cherish each (You) you give them so dearly that those (You)s are, in fact, the only thing keeping them alive at this point. They see you as easy marks because you've proven in the past you simply cannot help but shitpost when someone else shitposts.

user.. their existence is suffering. Pure, unfiltered, endless suffering. Haven't they suffered enough? Don't be selfish and give them (You)s to prolong their suffering for your enjoyment.

Withhold the (You)s. Don't reply to AOC or Tulsi Gabbard threads. Don't reply to shitposters. Let them finally realize the only way out is death. Let them find peace.

Show some restraint.

---ATTENTION---

>We have to play the long game
Yeah the long game is sort of rigged against us.

>shitposting on Jow Forums has become the highlight of their day
Aren't you describing everyone here?

Also

Stop

Writing

Like

This

I'll give a (you) to whomever I like.

really please we need a way to negate the nikolas cruz.... do wat you like, but don't set us up for an amendmental failure. if you think it can't happen.............

Stop erasing my board culture you dirty fucking board-jumper

Attached: aPlP-2.gif (480x270, 2.77M)

It’s aiming to overturn the ban that prevents guns legally purchased in NYC from ever leaving city limits.

That's not actually true, unless you subscribe to Jow Forumsnigger conspiracy theories. Look at the """March for Our Lives""", it was the lowest ranked protest in terms of youth presence out of all the major ones in recent memory, media astro-turfing aside. Zoomers and younger Millennials don't really give a fuck about guns, outside of the occasional partisan zealot who is anti-gun because that's the Good Democrat thing to do. The only people who really care about banning guns are aging suburban white women, usually Boomers or Gen Xers. Plenty of other people will virtue signal or respond to a cherrypicked poll on the subject, but they don't actually care. They want socialism and free shit. Anti-gun crap is a legacy position of the Democrat party, it's not inherently a leftist position from a purely philosophical perspective. It's a yuropoor position, and it's a Democrat position. And the Democrat party is likely going to implode within the next decade at the most.

The NY law is so onerous that I don't see even the less conservative justices taking it. Even with intermediate scrutiny, consider how difficult it will be for NYC to show how public safety within NYC is served by prohibiting you from taking a firearm OUTSIDE of NYC.