North American Arms Gaurdian

Only get these or the seecamps in .32

For .380 get sonething like a G42 or Ruger LCP 2

>Im husky not fat, it says so on my pants

Seconding the LCP2. LCP1 is fine also unless you're a spaz about trigger pull on a pocket gun.

why in 32 if they are the same size in 380 same mag capacity its the recoil much harsher??
I love mouse guns and im considering getting one

he is not funny, but i will defend him non the less.

FUCK YOU NIGGER I WILL KILLY OU WITH A GUN DONT FUCK WIITH ME FAGGOT

>Pretending to be a different user to make you previous comment seem viable
You can go ahead and off yourself since you have nothing to contribute to our species

haha, you are a wrong nigger

Attached: 3453534.png (643x288, 14K)

A gun made for twinks and faggots. I prefer the M1911 colt because it's the only pistol that been proven to work.

>45

Nice get

>Using two different computers
Shame shame, user

.

Eat better, ham fists

Recoil management can sometimes be subjective but you never know if you never fired a gun that has literally only a finger and a half of grip.

If you have a particular love of mouse guns the 32 ACP is going to be the more classic caliber. And historically that was more of the upper tier of mouse gun caliber.

If you want something more pragmatic I would definitely instead go with something like the Ruger LCP 2 in 380. that going also isn't exactly fun to shoot but because it is polymer it is definitely a no excuses lightweight carry pocket pistol, where is classic mouse guns are honestly more of an antiquated "vest pocket" thing better going to be a bit more awkward with their weight in ordinary pants pockets.

Major problem with having a gun that small for concealed carry is that it is honestly harder to draw in an emergency because you don't have that much to grip with. I wouldn't even consider these secondary carry guns: more like tertiary carry guns.

Guns like the LCP lean towards being more modern pocketable. The Glock 42 is a little large also in 380 but has the recoil of a bunny fart by comparison and as a result it would be easier to drive in an emergency.

thx for the elaborate response i understand all the topics you covered but im not cosidering it as a main ccw just something id carry in a hurry or a nice conversation piece to carry around.

for carry i rather have my bersa 380cc, the shield or g19.

i handled the lcp and the trigger is utter shit and compared to the seacamp kinda big. I have a beretta 950 which i enjoy a lot also

regarding the caliber 32 vs 380 32 ammo is hard to come by in my area only target ammo available

380 makes an already uncomfortable gun to shoot even worse.

>why in 32 if they are the same size in 380 same mag capacity
Not sure what you mean, but maybe you're confusing the Seecamp and Guardian?

The original Seecamp was in .25, and was a fairly unremarkable pistol -- sure, it was all modern and safe DAO, but the size isn't much different than a Baby Browning or similar.
Then they rechambered it to .32 ACP, while keeping it the exact same size, and was at the time by far the smallest and lightest .32 pistol on the market. (Still is smallest, though the Kel-Tec P32 introduced since is lighter, being a polymer-frame gun.)
Finally, they came out with the .380 version, which is STILL exactly the same size, which is really impressive.
Magazine capacity decreases with each increase in caliber, at 7, 6, and 5 rounds respectively.

The original NAA Guardian, on the other hand, was a copy of the .32 Seecamp in .32 -- and it's not quite as tiny, but it's pretty close.
Then they too released a .380 version -- but unlike the Seecamp .380, NAA just scaled the whole thing up. So the .380 Guardian is actually substantially larger than the .32 Guardian (or any of the Seecamps), but retains the same 6-round mag capacity.
Frankly, I find the .380 Guardian quite uninteresting -- it's basically the same size as a P3AT or LCP, holds the same amount of the same ammo, and weighs a lot more. If for some reason you're stuck on .380 rather than .32, the sensible choices are to go gucci with the Seecamp, or go cheap with the LCP; the .380 Guardian would be a dubious choice ignoring price, but when it costs twice as much as the LCP, there's really no contest.

Pic related, LCP vs Guardian in .380

fuck

Attached: LCP-NAAGuardian380comparisonchart-1.jpg (644x725, 89K)

and LCP vs Seecamp for comparison (LWS-380 shown, but like I said, the Seecamps are all exactly the same size.)

Attached: LCP-SeecampLWS380comparisonchart-1.jpg (644x725, 86K)