A Democrat is going to be president, the Democrats will control the house, the Democrats will gain 10 seats and control a super majority in the Senate.
Buy what you want now.
2021 will see semi auto bans, mag limits, ammo registration, red flags, licenses,waiting periods , universal commonsense regulations.
I don't see an end but the start of a bright new future, blood for the blood gods. If your a fat fuck, get into shape now, if you have eye problems fix that shit now, its almost our time boys!
So... is no purchase irrational now?
I'm not ready, but this is why I voted for Trump. He's not /ourguy/, but he's been useful enough to buy us some time.
So we finally have a reason to start executing libs
Spoken like a true (((merchant))
I dunno
This was a historically weak mid-term rally against a first term president.
The “Blue Wave” or whatever they called it was a flop.
Based on that, Trump 2020 isn’t out of the question.
Yes, the gun industry is full of (((merchants))). But like it or not, they're (((/ourMerchants/))).
>A Democrat is going to be president
Berniebro just tossed his hat in the ring and Don Lemon said Kamala Harris wasn't black enough on air. The party is going to be so splintered that their schism in 2016 will look like a little spat. And then you have the real possibility that indies like Schultz pulling a complete Ross Perot on top of that. It's hard to imagine a worse election field for the Democrats, voter unity is going to be nonexistent.
Normals aren't going to vote for the party with the guys in blackface and klan robes, nor the party that's has open antisemites among them.
Say what you will of the truth of those matters, but the fact is that these beliefs have become convenient to the current party remaining in power.
If they have any sense, which I doubt, then they'll not come any closer to this open flame once the opposition party is sufficiently taken care of.
>A Democrat will be President
How? Bernie Cuckers just announced he'll be running. He lost to Clinton. He'll siphon off votes from whoever gets nominated.
Kamala Harris and Creepy Uncle Joe "Get A Shotgun" Biden hasn't said a word about running yet. He's who the Dems want, and he seems sort of like he doesn't want to get into a presidential race at ~78 years old.
Warren is ruined.
Tulsi Gabbard got SJW-mobbed already.
Pls. Expalin, OP.
>Kamala Harris and Creepy Uncle...
I accidentally lime dHarris in there. I meant to say, she's getting called out for THOTing her way into the position she's in now.
You should already own everything you need or know a guy who can get it to you regardless of (((state))) regulation
This post is satire btw
I'm not so optimistic. I think libs are pissed off just enough to use their radicals like Bernie and AOC as pied pipers to mobilize voters.
My money is on Lizzie Warren or Kamala winning their primaries.
All the same, don't get cocky. Hubris is what brought Hillary and the Dems to their knees in 2016.
>AOC
>mobilizing voters
She's a laughing stock outside of her district and is now associated with getting planes out of use in a decade, thinking tax breaks equal extant funds, and driving away jobs. Warren just 12 gauged her chances after that DNA test shitshow.
I hope so, It's about time we get our whole 2A cake back...
Ave Nex Alea and blood for the blood god.
There's a nonzero chance that Kamala will be in federal prison by reelection time thanks that's to the fake hate crime in Chicago. It's not just a false police report. The Tylenol in the mail means the feds have to get involved.
Imagine being threatened by Bernie "My socialist healthcare plan will cost 6 trillion dollars a year, no refunds" Sanders or his horse-faced hispanic-jew woman clone. Our current president might sell his ass to Israel on the daily but he's still better than anyone in that party of retards.
>Dem darlings
>ever being held accountable
While we're wishing, I'd like a full giggle Rhodie FAL.
This.
the first midterm has involved a flip in both houses for the past several decades with a few exceptions. The dems didn't even get the senate this time.
This is normal. In fact, this is better than normal, because the democratic party is having a major identity crisis and may well split before the 2030s.
Can i get a link to this?
It's not fear that led me to my conclusions, but reality. Do not underestimate the idiocy of the average voter, or the tricks the Dems will pull.
I'm still not convinced. Maybe I've OD'd on blackpills. I could be wrong in my pessimism; stranger things have happened, such as Blumpf winning in the first place.
Yeah, I know it's a boomer meme but the Dems having the House is a good thing because the party is on fire, meanwhile Trumo has like 90% Republican support. The Dem civil war between the corporate globalists and democratic socialists is hilarious to watch. Then of course there's that Muslim whore who threw gasoline on the fire by bashing Israel and AIPAC.
>King nigger for 8 years
>Senate and house both blue
>Two libtard supreme court appointments
>Autist guns down an elementary school
>Not one speck of federal gun control
Pic related is my level of concern.
All those things are already being successfully implemented at a state level
>How?
DEMOGRAPHICS!
Population replacement is what turned all these, once solidly red states, blue.
RIP America. Demographics are destiny.
It's just a conspiracy theory right now but it seem likely. The day Jussie Smollets claimed he was attacked Harris and Booker both called it "a modern day lynching" at the same time and used it to push their anti lynching bill through the Senate. Harris was friends with Smollets so she may have used him to fake the hate crime to push the bill.
>jannies ignore this thread
>jannies nuke the soccermom encounters thread in 5 minutes
I hate you guys
but muh BASTE HISPANICS
>Thread that affects everyone.
>Thread full of made up larping bullshit.
Consider my almonds activated, faggot.
>jannies delete fun Jow Forums threads
>gay demoralizing Jow Forums thread remains
Almonds activated, indeed.
It's because despite your propensity for doom and worry over mexican immigrants chanting "WE DIDN'T NEED MORE THAN 38 SPECIAL IN TIJUANA, ESE, BAN ASSAULT BULLETS" there are a lot of old - hold your breath here - jews - who are actually a little more intelligent than your average white grabber and are pushing the angle that it's a mental health issue and that we should hold off on shocking, divisive gun control measures for now. Their goal will actually get you institutionalized for dissent ("you share the viewpoint of shooters and bombers, don't tell us it's reasonable, if you weren't a psychopath you would agree with us. the party represents goodwill and empathy.") but trust me they're on your side for now.
You can have all the guns you want so long as there is no chance that you pose a threat to the power structure.
>Upon receiving this gun, I hereby swear my support to the United States and its Allies, renounce all prejudice against the United States and its Allies, and swear upon my life that shall I ever betray the United States and its Allies that I will surrender my weapons until I have seen the error of my ways in a state-approved political re-orientation program.
>now say it, ya putz
>"I am free."
blackpillers are faggots who get off on losing. Stop being a bitch. Imagine if you told someone in June 2015 what things are like now. They would slap you in the face for being blackpill faggot
>Demographics are destiny
Don't get hyped about white states then. White people of west/north euro descent unequivocally support "common sense" gun control worldwide with or without duh niggers and jews to egg them on.
>poor reconstruction of olde timey gun control:
>surely a mere farmer has no need for a sword that grand, tis the weapon of a knight. neither art thou trained to use it, but thou hath no use for it but combat with the kings knights. art thou plotting to be a traitor to our land? should you be needed to defend us against the moors the king shall arm thee anyways. only knights should have battle swords.
Oh yes the US WAS about freedom, but that was when it was founded and inhabited by europe's rejects, criminals, and other outliers, before all the well-to-do euros came over because they realized it was a good place to get rich.
The only people who are naturally pro-gun are slavs, arabs, and actual natives who remember a shred of their history.
>fix your eyes
You mean get glasses? I'm pretty sure eyelets already have glasses.
>not knowing the board culture significance of soccermom threads
Go back to r e d d i t.
Fuck off with that shit. Merchants only look out for fellow merchants.
>tfw i'm a merchant
don't worry goy, i'll lend you my guns for a small fee
>Buy what you want now.
call me blackpilled but i'm in this mindset desu. my goal is to have everything I want + ammo & mags by the end of the year. I fully expect the cuckening to begin in full in 2021.
>founders of America, who were wealthy landowners and businessmen, who gave the right to vote to white landowning men of good moral character
>Europe’s rejects, criminals, and other outliers
Ok retard
If you have stable income, 2 years is plenty of time.
full Jow Forums chan might be dead, but the users are infinitely better
>but that was when it was founded and inhabited by europe's rejects, criminals, and other outliers
Imagine getting Australia confused with America.
It's funny how the MSM tripped over themselves to sweep this under the rug, while a republican would be politically lynched for this. It's so one sided that I don't even think leftys deny it anymore, the media is full-on Goebbels propaganda now.
>Oh yes the US WAS about freedom, but that was when it was founded and inhabited by europe's rejects, criminals, and other outliers, before all the well-to-do euros came over because they realized it was a good place to get rich.
uh no m8, the people who came over origionally were religous outcasts and poor/middle class people who wanted land and a fresh start.
The fact that none of them are even owning up to it shows they have no shame.
Maybe it is finally time to make the move. I shall be new once more.
>bashing israel and AIPAC
I missed this, wut?
>White people of west/north euro descent unequivocally support "common sense" gun control
No they don't.
Some Muzzie Comgresswoman (Omar is her last name) pointed out that Israelis are buying American politics. Pelosi was immediately on it and got her to apologize for criticizing our Best Ally.
white person's idea of protect gun rights:
"everyone should be allowed to have a reminton 700 and a smith and wesson revolver"
Black persons idea of gun rights: vote Democrat for free gibs and have illegal weapons so laws don't matter
No, the Republican party regularly going against what those populations support is what's turning those states blue. For example, Florida will likely flip solid blue next election considering the local Republicans freaked out about the idea of not continuing to treat former criminals as second class citizens long after they served their sentences. Likewise, gays and those who know/are related to anyone who is gay are going to be weary voting for a party that regularly caters to people who think gays should be treated as second class citizens.
the day they attempt to implement all of this shit is the day i load my rifle with libertarian intent
two party systems are cancer
>you can have freedom and no rights BECAUSE RIGHTS ARE DEGENERATE
>you can have rights, but not freedom BECAUSE FREEDOM IS DANGEROUS
>you can have money, but no environment BECAUSE PROTECTING IT COULD HALVE PROFITS OR WORSE
>you can have environment, but no money BECAUSE IT'S NOT FAIR IF SOME PEOPLE ARE RICH
>end result is no freedom, no rights, no money, smoggy skies and water so laden with various chemicals that people are frequently born with severe, crippling gender dysphoria that's so bad even transitioning doesn't make them feel 100% better and they have a mental breakdown any time they remember they don't have a uterus, and that's a good thing(tm)
I had an uncomfortably vivid dream last week where Clinton won over Trump. Not in 2016, but in 2020, that wretched dusty cunt just wouldn't give up I suppose. That dream honestly affected me for a couple days and put me in a weird state of genuine fear for what the future holds. Trump may not be "pro gun", but he's at least not anti-gun. Any democrat that wins in 2020 (god forbid) I worry will go much harder on gun control than any previous president.
Trump is anti-gun, he's just too pussy to push hard for it until he gets his second term.
yes, surely, the people who are zero to one generations removed from the country that literally banned "assault bullets" (no calibers used by any military allowed) fully support the second amendment and only vote blue because trump is raycis
I really don't think he gives a damn about guns one way or the other. For what reasons do you say he's anti?
>muh board culture
Soccermom threads have been shit, repetitive, and unoriginal for years. Jow Forums would probably be a better place if they ceased to exist. Same with the funny Jow Forums screencap threads.
He's historically supported AWBs and "common sense" gun control since he's ever spoken on the issue
user, its time for you to leave
>If ONLY we could suck off gays more and pander to convicted brown people better!
You have to go back.
The democratic party is currently disintegrating. No one knows what it stands for and the newest members are in open conflict with the party's core leadership. They aren't the threat that you're making them out to be, this next election could very well kill them, their recent additions last fall highlighted major schisms. If they move on guns they will lose national coherency.
>thread about democrats wanting to grab guns gets forcibly steered into DRUMPF AND CONSERVATISM BAD
Gee that sure does happen an awful lot on a board about weapons...
>If they move on guns they will lose national coherency.
Which is why they won't run on guns. They'll run on gibs and "transparency" (for everyone but themselves). They'll move on guns once they have control.
Lol just like Hillary is going to win by a landslide in 2016
Liberals never get tired of being wrong
Your President is getting re-elected
republicans are dogshit though
>you should have the right to free speech!
>citizen: me?
>no, i'm talking about the company's right to use advertising techniques based on CIA brainwashing research
>and you should have freedom too!
>citizen: me!
>no, the company that wants to use unstable plastics to package all their food. it's not the government's place to hurt them because plastic MIGHT leech a few endocrine disruptors!
>and you!
>citizen: let me guess...
>yes, the pharmaceutical company selling birth control pills should not have to disclose the fact that they disrupt the neurological mechanisms behind pair bonding, or are excreted from the body in the form of estradiol, a powerful endocrine disruptor which....
>citizen: go on
>nobody should HAVE to filter out of the water. it's not even that bad.
>democrat: yeah they should have to. also ban guns.
>citizen: HILLARY 2020! wait, guns?
>democrat: guns? what guns?
>They'll move on guns once they have control.
The party will die if they pursuit gun control as a national policy. If they lose that then there's nothing to stop others from turning back their reform, this has already happened before and the public is a little more defensive about it as they were back then.
We just lost the congress and senate, guy. We need a political pivot because who the fuck knows who the next frontrunner is going to be? The Repub party last year seemed like a circus until Trump came out in front of Cruz.
>20 years later
>imprisoned for saying "nigger" on the internet
>don't rebel because you have 0 ng free testosterone as the dems never followed up on their promises to protect the environment
>also you have no children because your wife is infertile and both of you have cancer
Jesus fucking Christ, you think anyone is going to read after
>citizen:me?
It's not even a stance I'm taking against you, your writing is more of a chore to read than me responding to you in this comment.
t. defeatist shill
Sorry m8o i was homeschooled in alaska and never learned how to write gud
Half my reading was classic literature and transcripts of plays, the other half was math textbooks
>Which is why they won't run on guns.
They're scrambling over one another to see who can be the most vocal antigunner candidate, are you fucking retarded? Even the current picks for the nomination, Harris and Beto, have proudly gone on record saying they support a permanent AWB. They're racing to the left, even entertaining the notion of centrism is out the window.
This was one of the most cringe things I've read all month.
>They're scrambling over one another to see who can be the most vocal antigunner candidate, are you fucking retarded?
They don't actually fucking run on it, there's a difference between rhetoric and the actual platform.
> They're racing to the left, even entertaining the notion of centrism is out the window.
Which is why they're fucked.
>a party propped up by anti gunners will die if they pursue an anti gun stance
>The democratic party is currently disintegrating
Yeah, they were supposedly falling apart in 2016 as well yet Hillary still won the national popular vote and only lost the election due to somewhere around 60k votes in key states.
But the Republican party deserves the criticism they get here since they aren't even reliable on guns and keep trying to make their "support" for guns conditional based on a ton of other losing issues that will just end up dragging down gun rights with them. It's the same reason people have been criticizing the NRA recently.
They die if they lose the middle, which pursuing guns will do. The more conservative members know this, the newer and more radical members do not. For all the stuff they say about gun control, the old guard do as little as they can acceptably do to maintain an anti-gun position because they realize what actually happens if you pursuit AWBs and more radical measures. The new dems are tearing the party into pieces over it.
I'm not a Trump supporter and I've voted Democrat in the past...
I'll be voting for Trump in a fucking heartbeat, just to keep the current batshit insane left from getting the power they so badly want to abuse
I know a ton of people who feel this way... our biggest threat in this scenario is the ones who can't bring themselves to vote for Trump/Republican
2016 was the key year, their platform was fairly intact and the dem's core still dictated its position fairly effectively. They're now fighting openly with each other.
It's odd that blue-dog union democrats and FDR would be considered radical conservatives these days.
>We're fucked because the Democrats are racing to be left of Che and are tossing any semblance of sanity out the window but they WON'T run on control despite this and the fact they're all loudly calling for strict gun control at every opportunity
God damn you are a stupid nigger.
>Hillary won the popular vote and yes the dems do want to take your guns BUT
now this is gaslighting
You're the moron who doesn't actually understand rhetoric beyond the surface level.
There is no middle anymore and your reliance on normies and centrists is one of the key reasons we do nothing but lose
Are you retarded?
>the republican party just needs to cuck out and go blue to win blue voters
fuck off, no compromising
>All rapidly radicalizing candidates say in a loud, unifying voice "GUN CONTROL NOW"
>"lol it's just surface level"
Tell your handlers they're not getting their money's worth.
>they won't run on guns
Imagine being this much of a mental midget.
>There is no middle anymore and your reliance on normies and centrists is one of the key reasons we do nothing but lose
There is in actual elections. They'd alienate loads of potential voters.
They've been saying since the AWB went down. Only the radicals have a genuine interest in these measures, but they'd need to kill the party to get them.
>Hillary still won the national popular vote
they just can't help themselves lmao
The non-caved-in-head position is to loudly criticize any cucking from republicans on guns, call them out, make noise online, and try to get hard right /our guy/ types on during the primaries, but you NEED to vote straight straight R come election time.
Yes the establishment GOP is bad, but the hard-left direction the democrats are taking is worse.
>I’m not voting for either!
Ok Mr. big brained man, You can be glad you were principled when a Kamala Harris ATF is kicking down your door because you own semi-autos.
>>hmm, maybe we should try to treat minorities and ex-cons like people
>WTFFF LMAOOO YOU WANT US TO KEK? NIGGER FAGGOT HAHAHA
This is why you will lose, retard. You have the chance to steal certain voting blocks away from us. You wouldnt even have to adopt leftist policies, just tone down your own, more disagreeable policies. But you wont, because you let your own autism get in the way every single time.
I'm pretty sure he meant lasik
>you don't need to adopt leftist policies to swing groups that put gibs above all else
>Only the radicals have a genuine interest in these measures
I guess you've been in a coma, the radicals ARE the party now despite Nancy's desperate attempts to stave them off.
>but they'd need to kill the party to get them.
Yeah take a guess what's happening.