She's back

Well, in about 10 years she will be.

Attached: IMG_20190225_114900.jpg (506x506, 38K)

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/AdmPhilipJones/status/1099980009211682817
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Ponce_(LPD-15)
twitter.com/AdmPhilipJones/status/1068082573602115585
youtube.com/watch?v=jYv4duwu2p8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

twitter.com/AdmPhilipJones/status/1099980009211682817

Why is the bongs so mjch better at naming ships then everyone else?

because they started it in times where good names were acceptable, and now have fleet small enough, that they can easily reuse only the good names.
Also, lack of tradition of bribing politicians with ships named to stroke thier egos.

hehehe despicio sound like despacito

Contrast with US ship names: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Ponce_(LPD-15)

Cool. Best sister returns. Although Queen Elizabeth are now a carrier and she's a submarine. Still waiting for the new Big-tittied HMS Belfast.

Attached: 61d5bd385c1d48a7d8ccb21bc2ac9c5d.jpg (548x764, 108K)

HMS Belfast (Type 26)due around 2027

Attached: 1536826258422.jpg (1005x1123, 212K)

can't handle the bants?

twitter.com/AdmPhilipJones/status/1068082573602115585

Names of all the new T26's including Belfast and Sheffield.

Attached: 1541246247552.jpg (968x726, 54K)

>HMS Gay Bruiser
>HMS Pickle
>HMS Snowflake
>etc.
Some British warships have cool sounding names, others, not so much.

Thats what subs are for. Or do you think submarine collisions are rare?

The only navies that avoid them are navies who never use their subs in a remotely aggressive way.

Go take your anglophobia elsewhere

>Thats what subs are for
LOL'd. Do you even know what happened?

>anglophobia
or is it islamophobia?

Attached: 1543285695174.jpg (640x914, 128K)

>HMS Gay Bruiser
>HMS pickle
>Not cool names

Wew

you've never heard of the perisher have you?

They literally weave in amongst ships for hours at a time.

I have user, I have.

Attached: 1522835308517.jpg (639x650, 101K)

thanks for proving how regular this is. go be jealous elsewhere. there's a good bet your country doesn't even have SSN's, and if they do they are probably garbage.

god AL fucked up Warspite's design so badly.

>jealous

Attached: 1536976045170.jpg (851x630, 146K)

you're obsessed, it must upset you being inferior to us.

>there's a good bet your country doesn't even have SSN's, and if they do they are probably garbage.

He could be American technically.

Astute is superior to Virgina. but Vriginia is not garbage. I also doubt he's american. It's usually irrelevant euros or Canadians that seethe that hard about the UK.

This. If you think being the captain of the Gay Bruiser is embarrassing, then you aren't thinking of the bants you could potentially have with whoever you sink.

>Astute is superior to Virginia

Well, ya, but we're building like 50 of them. Aren't the Canadians buying a French SSN?

>gay bruised
I dunno about you but I’d sail on a fag bashing warship

>us
The sun has set on the British empire and your navy. Come back when you have more carries than anyone else combined.

The Royal Navy is a shit show run by a bunch of no-nonces that's just slightly more qualified than a bunch of Indian street shitters on a schooner.

Prove me wrong. Oh wait, you can't. Can't wait for every ship to have to drop anchor five times a day so the majority Muslim crew can have their daily prayer sessions.

>most prestigious ship of WW1 and 2 comes back as a black dildo
It's a metaphor for Britain after WW2, really.

a dildo we continue to slide into whoever the fuck we want

Attached: HMS Conqueror Jolly Rodger.jpg (800x1192, 195K)

The Conqueror is laying in mothballs waiting to be scrapped kek, pretty much a metaphor for the entire Royal Navy. What an absolute joke, you're nothing more than a glorified sonar picket for the USN, your spiritual liege.

Attached: 1548649379480.jpg (3996x2664, 843K)

>pretending to be american

>The Conqueror is laying in mothballs waiting to be scrapped kek

as are most 1960's boats. we have new ones now, shall i tell you more about them?

>In 2012, during the joint exercise Fellowship, Astute performed simulated battles with the latest United States Navy Virginia-class submarine, USS New Mexico. A government press release reported that the Americans were "taken aback" by Astute's capabilities. Royal Navy Commander Iain Breckenridge was quoted, "Our sonar is fantastic and I have never before experienced holding a submarine at the range we were holding USS New Mexico. The Americans were utterly taken aback, blown away with what they were seeing"

Don't worry we're kind enough to let the americans share in our developments in quieting, sonar, and propulsion. they let us see their notes for reactors after all.

Attached: HMS Trenchant BTFO USS Whale.jpg (1072x427, 55K)

>believing retarded Bong propaganda
Whatever it takes to keep you cucks complacent and believing you still rule the world while Mohammed fucks your wife. What a pathetic and servile race, all of our best Americans were Dutch. Kill yourself, dipshit.

Attached: 1437594991939.jpg (533x414, 32K)

>has facts pointed out to him
>gets upset and has no counter argument
>starts throwing insults

What an unexpected surprise.

Thanks for outing yourself as phlegm though. Please type your next reply in a language that isn't English so that we don't have to read it.

Attached: 1337613599623.png (450x288, 219K)

Is the Astute Seawolf-tier?

HMS Pansy wrecked so many U-boats though that U-Boat captains would not even bother trying to attack ships if they spotted her near a flotilla they were targetting.

Nothing better in war than giving a quietly effecient ship a comical name just to further demoralise them or risk being another victim of the pansy's awesome power.

Same was true for HMS Fairy and HMS Fluffytuff.

Seawolf was expensive because of it's construction materials and because it used lots of technology that wasn't mature. Modern western boats use many of the successful technologies.

As a modern SSN Virgina and Astute are better because they are 15-20 years newer.

As a deep diving submarine for special mission Seawolf is great.

Am I supposed to be impressed that you guys heard a US submarine once or twice? Big fucking deal? We track your shitty dildos swimming through the water all the time, it doesn't change the fact that you scrapped 90% of your navy after WWII and it was turned into little more than a sonar picket for patrolling the GIUK gap. Yeah, I'd hope you're good at your job of listening for enemy submarines so that your master can let you off the leash while we get around to getting over there and doing the hard work. Absolutely pathetic, absolutely servile and disgusting. The absolute state of the Bongish Navy. Unironically kill yourself, or just spend some time on a Royal Navy frigate and wait for the Argentines to sink it.

seething

Attached: 1458833182720.jpg (465x620, 37K)

And like most British ship's it'll end up spending the majority of it's life in a dock doing fuck all while it's crew slowly get bored & take drugs while fucking each other (c.f. Trident crew), this is assuming it'll actually be ready by the time it's finished but no, more than likely it'll get so delayed due to some shitty reason or another that it'll be outdated by the time it comes out.

Oh, and can't forget that if it ever does go swimming it'll probably spend it's time launching multi-million pound missiles at goat farmers armed with AK47s

dry your eyes m8

Attached: 1344800156708.png (323x810, 211K)

>coasting off of your achievements from 200 years ago
Pathetic.

Attached: freedom banned in britain.jpg (1400x2536, 1.55M)

>tfw even the French have a better carrier

Attached: flat.jpg (1900x1200, 2.91M)

Feels good having the high score. I love that it makes you this upset. Please keep posting so i can chortle at your butthurt

Attached: 1451929519218.jpg (469x698, 69K)

>Don't worry we're kind enough to let the americans share in our developments in quieting, sonar, and propulsion

Now you're starting to crawl up your own ass. You and I both know that the Virginia class was designed to be a cheaper alternative that would act as a platform we could continuously upgrade instead of blowing our entire load on a new seawolf because those cost billions. With the SSN(X) program designed to be just that, fitted with all the best new technology we've paid a bunch of eggheads to figure out. Whereas the Astute was designed for that purpose from the ground up to make up for the fact there would only be seven commissioned.

>fitted with all the best new technology we've paid a bunch of eggheads to figure out.

You mean us? hence why you are using our towed array design, our propulsor design and our mainframe sonar arrangement?

Attached: TheSunNeverSets.jpg (1200x750, 93K)

Fish don't vote!

ironically enough those helicopters are the only fucking things that can currently land & take off on that piece of shit

Whats it like to have everything you say be wrong?

>youtube.com/watch?v=jYv4duwu2p8

You fucking idiots couldn't manage to get the Astute seaworthy until General Dynamics helped you out. And we could run a tally on how much of our technology you're currently siphoning on.

You're a citizen of a decaying island nation wanking off to past glory you never had a part of, and your nation's only purpose left on this earth is to serve as fodder for Americans when we go to war with one of the actual world powers. Your navy will fight and die for the United States for no territorial or economic gains at the drop of a hat because that is what you do.

Attached: 1510460243000.png (399x382, 89K)

>talks about technological supremacy
>posts their shitty brand new carrier that's undermanned, has a ramp, and doesn't even have any aircraft that can take off from it except helos
What an absolute joke of a country. All the rest of the shit you said is wrong too but whatever, it's pointless trying to argue with a retarded Limey drunk and explain why his country isn't as amazing as he thinks it is.

>youtube.com/watch?v=jYv4duwu2p8
>landed
>"HMS Queen Elizabeth is on track to deploy on global operations from 2021"
>"helps bring an end to the eight-year hiatus since a British aircraft carrier last operated a fast jet from its deck"
>"35B flight trials are expected towards the end of 2018"

Fucking retard these are all trials. The fucking thing wont be able to fight for years yet.

>Claims planes can't take off or land on it
>Gets proven that planes can take off and land
>Moves goalposts immediately

lel

Shoo shoo Armatard.

>ignores the fact that the carrier has been in service since 2017 and still can't actually be used in combat

don't worry, by the time your F-35s are ready it'll probably be back in the dry-dock for maintenance, good thing you got rid of those Harriers

>Fucking retard these are all trials.

Trials it completed. There's no rush, we're not about to fight anyone. And if we needed to we could use F35 off QE without issue.

Feels good having 5th gens at sea that can take off from a ramp with a higher payload and fly further than any current CATOBAR/STOBAR aircraft barring F35C.

Even better is it makes foreigners furious.

Attached: 22538594_1582793661767343_8666051237989786980_o.jpg (2048x1447, 304K)

How many carriers, 5th gen jets and SSN's does Canada have?

Still mad bestspite wasn't rebuilt and kept in a state of preservation.

Attached: warspite.jpg (1222x804, 175K)

>"November 2015, the government announced its commitment to a full order of 138 F-35 aircraft, with 24 available for carrier duties by 2023"

I hope that figure is fucking wrong because if we've only got 24 by 2023 we'd be in the shit if we needed them, quick hint: no piece of kit is ever 100% available

>I hope that figure is fucking wrong because if we've only got 24 by 2023 we'd be in the shit if we needed them, quick hint: no piece of kit is ever 100% available
That's 24 out of a total fleet of 48.

An order that can be accelerated if there is any sign of rising tension.

The bulk of our order is arriving after Block 3 with the superior systems, Meteor, Brimstone/SPEAR3, internal ASRAAM. Until then we are using AMRAAM C-8, external ASRAAM and Paveway

Attached: 34701777_10156531914579885_4313679364702076928_o.jpg (1800x1009, 169K)

Feel free to correct if wrong with each carrier taking 24 aircraft will obviously make a total fleet of 48, which still leaves the issue of availability.

>Feel free to correct if wrong with each carrier taking 24 aircraft will obviously make a total fleet of 48

There are 48 on order out to 2024, the remaining 90 aircraft will be ordered and arrive during and after 2024 in a sime scale that has yet to be confirmed - SDSR 2020 will set out the timeline.

All the aircraft are joint RAF / Fleet Air Arm, so can be deployed at sea or on land as needed - that's how easy carrier ops have become with F35B.

Attached: 1538430314216.jpg (2880x1920, 2.71M)

The current planning assumption is that both carriers will not be operating alongside each other, unless direly required.

As much as the join RAF/Fleet sounds and fun in theory, simply "swapping them over" to one another means having separate pilots all around, so what are they going to do? Keep F-35 ground pilots waiting for their plane to get swapped back to the RAF if needed? Because you certainly can't get them to land on carriers, that's something only the Fleet Air Arm will be training.

>simply "swapping them over" to one another means having separate pilots all around

no, same pilots. Some F35's will be permanently embarked as it stands that will be the 12 aircraft of 809 squadron (immortals).

the RAF pilots of 617 squadron (dambusters) will be the ones flying any F35's deployed to HMS QE. As i said, carrier ops with F35B on HMS QE is easy, the RAF pilots will train to do it.

Attached: DCwiQa4XgAEEEzN.jpg (1200x857, 134K)

>the RAF pilots will train to do it

Fighter pilot selection is hard, and carrier pilot selection is even harder because landing on a carrier isn't easy and is dangerous, regardless of what you're flying. It requires extra training and selection. So now we're going to make all of our main fighter pilots carrier capable? This is going to cost an absolute fortune.

It's not nearly as hard as it used to be. F35 does all the work, the pilot just keeps a glide slope generated by the aircraft, no different to a zero visibility landing. It's a STOVL jet, so the RAF will be practicing vertical takeoff and landings just the same.

Plenty of RAF harrier pilots flew off carriers and that was a far harder task.

As for cost - thats taken up by simulators, then they just fly out to a carrier on exercise and take off and land a few times to get/renew certification.

Helicopter pilots go through the same process each time they embark.

101: Concern Trolling

Four words: No and synthetic training.

>You fucking idiots couldn't manage to get the Astute seaworthy until General Dynamics helped you out.
Electric Boats was CAD skills and contract process. Not making it "Seaworthy".

>And like most British ship's it'll end up spending the majority of it's life in a dock doing fuck all while it's crew slowly get bored & take drugs while fucking each other (c.f. Trident crew)
If you honestly believe that, go look at the Twitter feeds of the RN warships - you'll see they're pretty active.