The aircraft that saved Jow Forums
Other urls found in this thread:
codeonemagazine.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
What is that, a new F 16?
Why didn't the Pakistanis use SAMs anyway? Or was it simply quicker to dispatch those jets to shoot down the intruding MiGs?
wow that's a great looking F 16
Apparently the paki's baited the poos by faking an attack then pulling back, drawing the indians over the border and then ambushing them.
New F-16 model?
Sino-pakistanti light fighter jet
>literally has the name in the filename.
Here's your (You)s ya goofs.
It's a JF-17 “THUNDER DRAGON”.. although Pakistan calls it something else that no one cares to remember.
If it's based on anything, MiG-21 (started as a J-7 upgrade program). Pretty much everything about it has been changed though.
Imagine believing R*ssian aircraft are better than western aircraft, only to have your shit be shot down by a Chinese knockoff of a western design.
It's an updated MiG-21 essentially.
Well then imagine getting shot down by a Chinese knock off of your own design.
That thing had design help from Grumman at some point too.
>Imagine believing R*ssian aircraft are better than western aircraft
you are aware that ALL 5th gen planes today are using Russian airframes, right? F-35 ==> Yak-43 airframe. Su-57 (obviously Russian) and J-20 is using MiG 1.44 airframe and avionics.
the joke
>
>
>
>
your head
Is this an F-16 with extended fuel tanks?
>1542430897012.png
From the other threads:
Aint going to waste my time to write an answer to this picture, straight from the archive:
A little list of stuff that is fishy on a short glimpse in this picture alone >Yak uses dedicated vertical thrust jets not a lift fan
Obvious difference hence why they lie about it.
>work of Petr Ufimstev was deem to be useless for soviets and so it was allowed to be puplish publicly
American making stuff work russians could not.
>the picture of the YAK-43 is according to wikipedia from a site for vector graphics that is offline, great source
On top of that every vantik like you would have shitted all over me for using something from wikipedia, while almost all the text on the picture is from there.
>there is no source at all for the YAK-43 using s-ducts
Inb4 "but YAK-40 and YAK-42 had them". Yeah they had them but they are fucking civilian airliners and entire different planes
>American shit f-35 is a copy of glorius beautiful Russian Yak-43 because they look the same
Yeah well a Samsung Galaxy S10 has a touch screen and is rectangular shaped, it doesn't mean they copied a shitty old IPhone 3gs to make it.
AG strikes when?
I want to see those CM-400AKG hypersonic missiles in action against the Poos
Really shows the powerlevel of the chinese century:
China > Allied Russia >>>>> shit >>>> America
>doesn't mean they copied
But they did. Samsung had to pay Apple over half a billion dollars in damages for copying.
Lockheed has receipts for Yak-43 so no infringement there. They paid for it fair & square.
They did rip off stealth thought.
>They did rip off stealth thought.
You mean they were able to explore a technology that the Soviets could not?
Wrong
codeonemagazine.com
>A great deal of misinformation has appeared on the Internet regarding the relationship of the Soviet Yak-41 (later Yak-141), NATO reporting name Freestyle, to the X-35 and the rest of the JSF program. The Pratt & Whitney 3BSD nozzle design predates the Russian work. In fact the 3BSD was tested with a real engine almost twenty years before the first flight of the Yak.
>Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, the Soviet Navy wanted a supersonic STOVL fighter to operate from its ski jump equipped carriers. At what point the Yakovlev Design Bureau became aware of the multi-swivel nozzle design is not known, but the Soyuz engine company created its own variant of it. The Yak-41 version of the nozzle, from published pictures, appears to be a three-bearing swivel duct with a significant offset “kink.” The Yak-141 also used two RKBM RD-41 lift engines – an almost identical arrangement to the Convair Model 200 design. The aircraft was also re-labeled as a Yak-141 to imply a production version, but no order for follow-on series came from the Russian Navy.
>Yakovlev was looking for money to keep its VTOL program alive, not having received any orders for a production version of the Yak-141. Lockheed provided a small amount of funding in return for obtaining performance data and limited design data on the Yak-141. US government personnel were allowed to examine the aircraft. However, the 3BSN design was already in place on the X-35 before these visits.
>Kevin Renshaw served as the ASTOVL Chief Engineer for General Dynamics and was later the deputy to Lockheed ASTOVL Chief Engineer Rick Rezabek in 1994 when the 3BSD concept was incorporated into the X-35B design. Renshaw continues to work in the Advanced System Development branch of Skunk Works where he is currently working on flight demonstration of the DARPA ARES VTOL UAV program.
>You mean they were able to explore a technology that the Soviets could not?
They just stole it. Ben Rich was proud of it.
They bought it. You can't deny it. F-35 looks like Yak-43 that went through minor changes.
The soviets were not only able not to explore it, they also totaly deemed the science behind it as useless and let it been published openly.
>minor changes
They stole a mathematical theorum from a published paper. Then they weaponized it. The Soviets never realized what they had, including the guy who wrote the paper.
>They just stole it. Ben Rich was proud of it.
You can't steal what was openly shown and distributed.
It wasn't. CIA stole it. They then translated it.
Funny how we went from "that's not russian" to "they just implemented the math and formulas and ideas". kek
it's funny how much the US needs russian brains to invent shit. No wonder the US has to import millions of people because US schools produce only retards... due to bad genetics (garbage in, garbage out).
You are a total liar, and you think you will convince the weak minded if you repeat this enough.
It was never a sensitive document, so no its not theft.
First thing is bullshit. It was published publicly, becausr soviets could not use it and saw no use for it.
Second thing is also bullshit. Those "minor" changes including f.e. removing 2 dedicated thrust engines, your claims are laughable.
And that you only can go and stomp your feet on your ground and claim again it is the same, with nothing to back it up beside claims that doesnt show it, is typical vatnik behaviour that revolves around butthurt and hirt feelings contradicting to fact.
>inb4 but they look similar again
>it's funny how much the US needs russian brains to invent shit. No wonder the US has to import millions of people because US schools produce only retards... due to bad genetics (garbage in, garbage out).
The analouge of a third world country that is incapable of processing its own resources while the first world uses them to make things is a far better one.
I can't tell if you are retarded or baiting. The F35 was built from the ground up and the frame doesn't even look similar to the yak. How the fuck is the F22 using a Russian airframe? Also if all of these are based on Russian designed airframes, how come the East didn't have a 5th get fighter much before the Americans and the West did? The huge development costs and public project hurdles should all be evidence that the F35 indigenously made 100%.
>Chinese knockoff of a western design.
>western design
u dumb as shit nigga
>They did rip off stealth thought.
Still waiting to see a R*ssian stealth aircraft.
The US doesn't copy, it improves.
There are similarities, but there are either also found in older american designs like the 3BSD nozzle design which was tested by america 20 years before the russians or they are obvious design choices that simply come automatically with the design of such a plane, like placing the additional lifting thing behind the cockpit or placing the engine further inwards for for a better angle of force in VTOL mode.
ITT
>A low quality knockoff of an American plane from the 70s still vanquishes any Russian foe
How will slavscum ever recover? Are they even human?
It was published internationally dipshit. Besides, it was just a mathematical model - and the vatniks themselves never realized the applications it might have.
There is a massive gulf between a mathematical model describing some physical process and a working technology using that process. So much so that an entire discipline of employment exists for crossing it, called "engineering"