Got hit 252 times

BEHOLD

THE TIGER'S GREATEST ENEMY

Attached: A FUCKING HILL.jpg (1280x960, 273K)

Tigers more mobile than M4 Sherman so whats your point

Wasn’t large enough to house the 88

*Gear box bursts into flames*

Would only affect the Ferdinand. Meanwhile shemans couldn’t even climb small slopes because Of the wheel base.

G*rmans are digusting subhumans who are not and never were white. At least they learned to stop starting wars against real white men who had to put them in their place. So fuck off with your overrated unreliadble piece of piece of subhuman trash. G*rmans make me sick Dresden 2.0 soon.

>got minor dents 252 times
>only able to drive 60 kilometres reliably

=irreliable piece of garbage

Im talking about the sloped metal bar they slapped on the Front of the turret.

A mantlet?

What did your country contribute to modern mankind?

The tiger 1 degenerates need to be put in their place.
>Heil Königstiger!

Attached: e632c63c9f353a5504dfad0cf351c405.jpg (1319x605, 178K)

What have G*rmans contributed to mankind in the last 100 years besides destroying Europe three times?

>mutts
>anglos
>french
>slavs
>white

Attached: smug.jpg (398x370, 17K)

Answer the question, nigger.

Their scientific contributions allowed human population to grow from below 1 billion to +7 billion, also, walking on the moon.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haber_process

Didn't the Tiger blow a tranny every mile?
Yes, I know what kind of jokes I'm opening myself up to.

quantum physics
spaceflight
the modern computer

Samefag

>implying massive population growth is a good thing

Correct the tiger 1 was a fag's tank which is why they built the chad tiger 2

Poolish death camps

>Their scientific contributions allowed human population to grow from below 1 billion to +7 billion
>Fritz Haber was born in Breslau (now Wrocław, Poland), Prussia, into a well-off Jewish family.[6]:38
Maybe we should've wiped germany off the face of the earth to begin with, would save us from billions of niggers,indians,chinks, spics and sand niggers

>Fritz Haber was born in Breslau, Prussia, into a well-off Jewish family
Yes, and many jews got the iron cross in WWI in service of the fatherland

Mainly 76 mm anti tank guns

>loses the war

what was that?

Slavnigger fuck off

Pretty sad story

Actually its reliabillity only improved

Oh trust me. The Tiger is the good 1

Loses the war, still destroyed tens of thousands of t34's

> Crewed by schnitzelnogs

How can you say something so bold yet so true?

Attached: 1547255663803.jpg (1600x800, 211K)

It drove only 60 km because thats how far the friendly lines were retard it could have kept on driving id it wanted

Why is it such a meme that heavier German tanks were unreliable when Russian tanks were worse?
At least the Germans properly assembled their autistic monstrosities and they failed after lots of use, unlike poorly made slavnigger tanks that came out of the factory not working properly.

Attached: IMG_6724.jpg (800x600, 125K)

>wtf the reddit memes about the nazi's tanks weren't true???
reminder that Le Panther is completely false and Russian trials of Nazi tanks showed that they were reliable

Cuz theyre jelous of germany its ubercool autistic ww2 shit that nobody else had so they have to find ways to demonize it

*transmission disintegrates*

this is india levels of cope

XD

Look at how tiny the MG34 looks lol.

Your tanks can't be unreliable if the front is right outside the factory and your tanks get destroyed before they break down.

Attached: secret documents.jpg (943x920, 209K)

Retarded below india tier mutts, anglos and semi asiatic vodka addicts having to cope for their inferior boring relying on numbers garbage cuck armies.

just imagine a tiger 2 with the jagdtiger's cocksleeve

calm down you retarded small dicked germ*n blood. read a book if you can lmao.

Because the Soviets had a much easier time just replacing the vehicle.

This, it was only the Germans logistical situation that severely deteriorated

Can this fucking meme stop already? Soviet tanks quality actually improved during the wars duration and they were sufficiently reliable enough to carry out some of the longest deepest mechanized offensives and penetration in HUMAN FUCKING HISTORY. The way its memed about here you'd wonder how they even made it to Berlin in the fucking things.

Sure they were sub standard by most measurements but not to the extent made out here, I think people confuse the abominations made out of the early war desperation of the Soviet industry with their output for the entirety of the war.

Fun fact: In Soviet use T-34s had as long service life as lendlease Shermans
>pic related
meme your way out of that

Attached: reliability-1.jpg (750x258, 81K)

For clarification the pictures shows:
T-34: 2000-2500 km, 250-300 hours
IS/ISU-122: 1200-1800 km, 230-280 hours
M4A2: 2000-2500 km, 250-300 hours
SU-76: 1200-1800 km, 180-200 hours

COPE GERMANY 45

If you think numbers are the decisive factor in a military engagement you've just proven to everyone your india tier retarded logic.

War isn't like your retarded child games where three green army men beat one green army man, theres so many more factors involved you genuinely sound pants on head retarded when you go about spouting "hurr-durr it was just numbers!"

God, modern Germans are pathetic. I’m glad my family left your shit country before the war, or we would be locked into perpetual servitude of Muslims.

I think the nazi's had camps for people who blew trannies, user

Yeah let's just forget how the French got their greedy hands on "Nazi tanks"

>with most being destroyed by carriage based guns
fixed that for you

Gott verdammt. Hans
ze transmission broke

or the also common 45mm AT gun.

OP is the wehraboo in this video.
youtube.com/watch?v=Ed8fdX9LGlY

>10 tons of steel over a unreliable piece of crap engine
>amaze that it can take punishment.
You a retard. what's the point of an armored vehicle if it cant bloody move?

Attached: 1524060476745.gif (250x250, 1.01M)

Perhaps the M-4s had the same service life as the T-34 because they were handled and serviced in the same rough and ready way. It would be interesting to see the service life in a western tank division for the M-4.

>Fun fact: In Soviet use T-34s had as long service life as lendlease Shermans
US engines could go about 2500-3000km in soviet service, while the T-34 engine only went about 1500km

in soviet memoirs, a guy in a lend lease sherman talked about how smoother and easier to maintain their shermans were in comparison to the T-34s

was it the tracks that didn't last long?

>cobble together tanks from various combat usage
>wonder why they don't work properly
>russians directly capture panthers and use them
>do well with them and comment that they're great tanks
yeah who wouldn't want to forget what the franconiggers say?

> irreliable
The absolute state of wehraboos

DAILY REMINDER THE FIRST 4 TIGERS OFF THE PRODUCTION LINE BROKE DOWN IN COMBAT WITHOUT FIRING A SHOT

IMAGINE YOUR ONLY PROTECTION AND WEAPON IN COMBAT JUST FUCKING BREAKS AND ITS JUST SITTING THERE IN AN OPEN EXPOSED FIELD SOMEWHERE OUTSIDE STALINGRAD UNTIL A GOOFY AS FUCK PO2 TRAVELING AT EXACTLY 45mph DROPS A 50 POUND BOMB ON IT

Attached: 1550803960468.png (1113x887, 528K)

>US engines could go about 2500-3000km in soviet service, while the T-34 engine only went about 1500km
I literally just posted a stat collected from the Soviets (the The 6th Guards Tank Army to be exact) that quite unmistakably states T-34s managed on average 2500-3000kms alongside the M2A2s they had in service.

I don't doubt there would've been T-34s in service struggling to crack past the 1500km mark due to the large variance in quality control and the roller coaster ride Soviet industry went through earlier in the war, but its simply untrue and totally disingenuous to say that 1500km was the average service life for the entire duration of the war.

>in soviet memoirs, a guy in a lend lease sherman talked about how smoother and easier to maintain their shermans were in comparison to the T-34s
Its a indisputable fact at this point that 1 for 1 a Sherman was a better and probably on the whole a somewhat more reliable vehicle then a T-34, the only thing I'm disputing is the extent to which the latter is true.

A significant number of the attacks made on the reliability of the T-34 use disproportionate amounts of anecdotes and statistics from early war performance which in reality are only testament to the dire state of Soviet industry at the time as opposed to the tank itself. Late war stats like the one I provided (from 1944) help prove this by showing the T-34 to be a reasonably capable and reliable machine once the Soviet industrial capacity was back on its feet.

it goes both ways, im sure the T-34 would've faired better in the caring hands of the US