OHNONONOONONONONONONO
DELETE THIS
>IAF shows parts of Amraam missile, says evidence confirms MiG-21 shot down Pakistan's F-16
>timesofindia.indiatimes.com
OHNONONOONONONONONONO
Jace Richardson
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Nolan Campbell
>here's part of a missile
This absolutely proves what type of aircraft was hit and that anything was hit at all.
Dylan Martinez
>MiG 21 shot down F-16 with an AMRAAM
Isaiah Morales
>MiG-21
>amraam
Noah Torres
Remember that time Syria shot down an arleigh burke class destroyer and showed some tomahawk's parts guys?
Jordan Evans
also dont fall for the missle bait either
Isaac Carter
for the 20th fucking time; its alreaby been identified as bits of a MiG not an f16.
Jose Torres
I don't care either way
Bentley Bennett
Pajeet doens't give a shit. He lies to save face, he has to.
Jeremiah Martinez
look at the radiant face of a woman whose cervix has been constantly dilated by the mighty BBC.
Chase Jones
SHUT UP IT'S F-16
HOW MANY MORE NEWS ARTICLES FROM TIMESOFINDIA, INDIATIMES, DAILY INDIA, NATIONAL INDIA NETWORK, CURRY NEWS NETWORK, INDIAN ARMY NEWS DIVISION AND T-SENEWS DO YOU NEED BEFORE YOU BELIEVE THAT INDIA SLAUGHTERED 30000 TERRORISTS AND DESTROYED 100 F-16???
Sebastian Roberts
yes and no, recipients of aim-120 under contract FA8675-05-C-0070 were the us air force,pakistan,poland,canada,taiwan,czech republic,hungary,jordan,malaysia,canada and singapore.
so either it belonged to the pakistani air force or another air force which paticipated in one of the following exercises and was taken as a souvenir.
en.wikipedia.org
the shown piece belongs to the propulsion section
Gavin Lee
>Curry News Network
top kek
Anthony Bell
Still think the more suspicious part is that the whole missile is torn and mangled but just conveniently is entirely intact on just the part that has the identification info.
Dominic Walker
Tyler Brown
Yes? And your point is?
Bentley Martin
they blew up a fat, time traveling Roman soldier.
Henry Phillips
Not that user but it's blatantly the wreckage of an indian MiG21 that they're trying to claim is an f16...
Jace Thomas
Yes? Once again, relevance to my post: ?
If the point is that Indians are lying fucktards, then he could at least take the effort to provide this argument in his post.
Also everyone already knows this, except some low IQ Pajeets that still cling to the hope.
Have another image of claimed "proof" of shot down F-16 just for good measure.
Daniel Brown
I don't think you're arguing with anyone user...
No one is disagreeing with you.
Isaac Ramirez
That is my entire point...
I am just questioning why this reply was directed at me.
John Wright
India (officials, IAF) has not claimed that any of those mig-21 crash pictures are the shot down f-16. Those are all just paki infowar intentionally feeding fake images, and low iq indians (including indian media) taking the hook and repeating the fakes.
There are multiple videos and eyewitneses for second jet falling into pakistani territory with two ejections from it. That Mig-21bis was single seater, so there was another plane that pakistan doesn't want to release pictures of
Jaxon Hall
Post videoe plz
Jackson Richardson
>ITT: poo in loo damage control
Nicholas Lewis
>India (officials, IAF) has not claimed that any of those mig-21 crash pictures are the shot down f-16.
Never said they had
>Those are all just paki infowar intentionally feeding fake images
Right, because providing the Indian government with an easy propaganda win on the home front is right in their interests?
>low iq indians (including indian media) taking the hook and repeating the fakes.
Agreed, low IQ seems to be the uniting factor of supporters for both sides
>There are multiple videos and eyewitneses for second jet falling into pakistani territory with two ejections from it.
>There are multiple videos
Care to share these "multiple videos"?
I have only seen one claimed as such, and even after rewatching several times i couldn't spot any claimed second ejection or parachute.
Will be interesting to see how this plays out over the long run, if Pakis lost a F-16 they are not going to be able to hide it forever.
And if it turns out the Indians are lying about this their credibility in the rest of the world is going to drop even lower than before, even if that is hard to imagine.
Jonathan Thompson
>Right, because providing the Indian government with an easy propaganda win on the home front is right in their interests?
it is because the paki leadership doesnt want to escalate the situation any further. giving the indians a chance to save face that will not harm pakistan is exactly what the paki leadership would want right now.
Hunter Perry
>doesnt want to escalate the situation any further.
Then why send a strike unit of aircraft they are not meant to be using for it into another nation on a bullshit mission of no actual importance to begin with?
Which is what the Indians keep claiming they did, leading to the claimed loss of said F-16.
Xavier Bell
Is like when Americans say 'F-35 of great!'. Everyone knows of false but a retard might mimic what is said and believe own breath even when it is fake news. Tl:Dr, just repeat over of over again and peoples will believe.
Isaiah Peterson
Well typed Ivan, good job.
Matthew Bailey
Smirfov, F35 absolutely of great.
Dylan Lee
>Care to share these "multiple videos"?
Still nothing?
Ok.
Didn't think so.
Luke Flores
>you can see from this one lighter pixel from this grainy picture that this is an F-16 not our mig getting btfo
Liam Wilson
But f35 is a good aircraft
Nathan Lee
Or it was part of India's NASAMS evaluation
Joshua Morales
That's a mig 21 buddy.
Nolan Murphy
Wyatt Jenkins
ITT