I hate these sights so god damn much
I hate these sights so god damn much
Then change them
you should try the steyr, shit's even worse
Whats wrong with them?
They're dovetail protectors. Think of them like those protective films they put on screens that have a picture of a working screen.
>Think of them like those protective films they put on screens that have a picture of a working screen.
Thing is, there are actual working screens under those protectors.
OP how do you not have the oem night sights?
Don't buy a glock. FN and HK make better guns at the same price point.
You chose poorly, user.
True. If you're carrying get some trijicons. If you're not carrying check out Dawson precision. I love Glock but their factory sights are probably the worst out of the popular polymer guns
And there are working dovetails under those dovetail protectors.
The point of Glock tho, which alot of people don't understand is You can do ALL your upgrades and maintenance with pretty much no tools except a punch/flathead. You really can't do that with any other guns that I'm aware of. Plus the aftermarket is king. But yah no gunsmith needed on Glocks, they're even simpler than ARs and just above Legos. Hell there are probably some Lego sets more complicated than breaking a Glock down all the way and reassembly
if you think Glocks are the easiest gun to break down / reassemble, you have not owned many guns
>The point of Glock tho, which alot of people don't understand is You can do ALL your upgrades and maintenance with pretty much no tools except a punch/flathead.
Whew, somebody should really tell their marketing department.
Wew, we got a fucking expert here fellas. END OF THREAD.
You cant do rear sights on a glock with a punch/flathead
How gun a gunless faggot like OP do that?
I mean, if you jam it hard enough it will come out one way or the other
Not accurately zeroed
No they dont. The HK equivalent is the VP9 which has a janky gritty trigger compared to glocks and the 509 is gonna get abandoned in a couple years just like the FNS was once it fails to meet FN's expectations.
Ok I'll give you that one, but as far as the rest of the works you can. And really you probably could do the rear with a punch, or small tool, mallet, but you'll probably need a vice. Still bare minimum
I've owned loads of guns and have been shooting since 2000. Which guns can you break down FULLY, armorer level, I don't mean basic field strip, and reassemble easier than a Glock?
>And really you probably could do the rear with a punch, or small tool, mallet, but you'll probably need a vice
I didnt have a nylon punch so I dented and banged the fuck out of my rear sight until I wised up and used a wirenut as a makeshift nylon punch. Wouldn't work with tritium sights to say the least.
Me too thats why I changed them to Trijicon.
P10c
Zastava M57 and most other Tokarev derivatives
I doubt. You own one you've broken down to that level?
Armorer level user not a field strip. That means the entire trigger assembly, sear, springs and all
Ya. It's been down to the bones with just a punch. All started with fiddling with the striker spring weight. Used glock spring cups to hold the new spring, funny enough.
It's really not, the Glock is better in every way except sights and ergos.
>FN making any pistol worth a shit since the Hi-Power.
>Maybe the Five SeveN, but there is a reason they make new pistols and discontinued every 7 years.
Lol yes, I know what he meant. It's an incredibly simple pistol to break down at that level. I take mine apart entirely maybe every 4th time I clean it. And I mean entirely.
Pleb
>FiveseveN
>Shrouded sao
>Magazine safety
Without Tom Clancy that thing would get shit on much more.
I've owned nearly every 9mm combat pistol produced.
The Glock is the only easy one that a literal child could detail strip you lying faggot.
Was it simple tho? I'm looking at the schematic it looks a bit more detailed than a Glock. You could teach pretty much anyone to do a Glock. But this is still one of the main reasons they became so popular the past 10-15 years, especially for competition shooters who wanted a cheaper entry gun. Most of these other pistols came after and imitated the design. Don't get me wrong I enjoy many other pistols besides Glock, I just find it funny it gets bashed so much on Jow Forums by people just trying to be contrians, when they don't even understand what made Glock...well Glock
Mah nigga
That's good. I can see it being pretty basic but it's not comparable to a modern polymer pistol that's able to do the same, especially with the aftermarket.
Let's be honest, it only sucks because of the lack of ammo. If you could buy the full 5.7 ammo line, it.and the PS90 wouldn't be fairly pointless
You don't like an answer you are going to get, because you're fudding it up hard. I'm trying to be reasonable here and not just shout "get Gaston's cock out of your mouth" you know? Yes, it was easy. Yes I have done the same with a glock, it was required in academy. A P10c is just what a G19 should have been 5 years ago. Plus, I'm sorry, I'm no fan of the vp9, but saying a glock has a better trigger come the fuck on.
People would take your opinion more seriously if it seemed like it was more well founded than a 14 year old arguing Xbox vs PlayStation.
>People will take your opinion more seriously on an anonymous carpet weaving forum
I'm devastated. Also you have two different anons I didn't post the trigger thing
>the poors are at it again
>A P10c is just an unreliable G19 that was 5 years late.
Ftfy
only your momma gives a fuck kid......stop making these jr high based threads.
Based trap masterrace