Is this acceptable?
Is this acceptable?
Other urls found in this thread:
Yes
depends?
if your trying to impress the old dudes twinking you out at the range mabye
Yes, but be careful, the mini-14 is a weapon fit for only the most elite of all operators.
>exposed action
>non-free floating barrel
>nowhere to place a red dot
But wait, it's chambered in 300 BLK- so
>heavier
>poor suppression
>inferior to 7.62 Soviet for the same barrel length
Just get a GayR and spend the difference in price on ammo/optic
platform of choice for operators whose targets do not return fire
M14 is literally the best 5.56 rifle.
Get an m1a
Apologies for being an idiot but I thought that 300blk was built around the idea that it would be paired with a suppressor?
For the price? No.
You say that like it's a bad thing...
the most ban-proof firearm out there
This.
yes
Yes, it's more aesthetic than a GayR.
>t. GayRfag
Wait, Downfall Hitler (pbuh) is in this movie
>chambered in 300 BLK
>poor suppression
Oh come on Ivan, that's literally what it was designed for. It's excellent suppressed.
The issue is the piston and operating rod making a commotion despite the can
Never heard of this movie, what's the context for guy sniping muh chilluns
What optic should you put on a 16” mini? It’s a trad looking rifle but might look dumb with a 3-9x40 fudd scope
I have a Vortex Strike Eagle on mine.
I want one in .450 bushmaster
ARs are highly aesthetic though the fucc you talking about?
>t. minifag with no AR
hai
he lo frned
>AR15 is for "operators"
>jams in the exact same situation
Remember, ARfags are just free ammo.
>300 memeout
no thanks