Hello fol/k/s. Do I buy an H&K VP9 or a Glock 45? (9mm, brainlet). Gonna be for CC

Hello fol/k/s. Do I buy an H&K VP9 or a Glock 45? (9mm, brainlet). Gonna be for CC.

Attached: skeeeeee.png (396x381, 128K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WMDMAEwjAeI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Go shoot both, make up your own mind, and you'll feel a lot better than if you listen to us.

youtube.com/watch?v=WMDMAEwjAeI

Hell no.

P30L

M&P 2.0, no reason to spend more on a plastic striker fired gun. Get a hammer fired pistol if you want to spend more.

Rami

VP9, the spring issues are long fixed, but you should hold both, and for CC unless your are huge I would try the VP9sk

Hello?

Lol, m&p is significantly lower quality and less reliable than HK or glock. And hammer fired pistols are a meme they offer 0 advantages over striker fired

.40 S&W ftw

ruger security 9 and and 2000 rounds of Critical Duty®

Attached: 1530516851525.jpg (848x477, 68K)

Glock 40 10mm

>Glock
How about not supporting a company that can't make proper sights. Buy a CZ P10, people buy glocks to change the trigger and the sights and end up with a P10

The p10c is an unreliable piece of garbage with not even close to the same amount of adoption and track record with military, spec ops, and police as glock does. And glocks do come with night sights if you specify them, or you can just change them out easily on your own to whatever you want. Imagine saying a whole gun is bad cause of muh sights which can be changed in an instant. The stock sights aren't even bad, Hickok was ringing a steel plate at 230 yds offhand with a glock that had a stock trigger and sights. You just can't shoot straight so you whine. The only other pistol manufacturers to compete with glock are hk, walther, and beretta. Cz doesn't even come close.

The worst part is that the Czech special forces literally use glocks instead of their native pistols, yet söiboys in the states hype them up.

FNS9c is thd best striker fired plastic gun. Those others are just blocky inferior platforms where you have to replace dverything to get it functioning.

These tests are fucking retarded.

VP9 user

Retard. P10 is ok, I don't care what police or military choose to fit their budget, I didn't say glock were garbage, do you know what they reading comprehension is? All I say is that THERE ARE better options than glock and there is no reason to support a company that made five generations of the same gun with garbage sights and trigger. Go repeat your reddit memes somewhere else.

> All I say is that THERE ARE better options than glock and there is no reason to support a company that made five generations of the same gun with garbage sights and trigger

1) for a combat pistol, there are no better options than a glock. There are options that can be considered equal, but not better.
2) The trigger is 5.5 lbs, it is by no means a bad trigger at all you should be able to make accurate shots with any gun regardless of the trigger. There are people that can make extremely long shots with the stock trigger, you're just whining and your statement is completely subjective
3) sights can be easily be swapped out and are not a reason to disregard an entire pistol. The military and police versions are shipped with metal 3 dot night sights. They don't do that on the civilian versions because most people are going to switch them out to whatever specific sight they want anyways so it just keeps the cost down.

>Citation needed: The Post

vp9, obviously.

If you're not buying a glock 19, don't buy a block.

>m&p is significantly lower quality and less reliable than HK or glock
prove it

Get the glock 45 and mount an optic

Get a 1911 instead.

same thinking here, I want a CZ P09 in 40 sw

I've had buyers remorse for every gun I have ever bought (two) in .40. Just get 9mm.

G45

This. I'm glad glock just includes the dovetail protectors because I hate most 3 dot sights and would want to get rid of them for 2 dots.

Get something with GRIPZONE

>for CC
The VP9 is not a small pistol. The SK model is a better pistol by every metric over the Glocks in the same size bracket. You have to decide if you want a good factory pistol on the chunky side, or a mediocre factory pistol with an obscene aftermarket of Batman toys to slap on the frame until it resembles a good pistol. There are of course 50 other striker pistols you could choose but you seem set on those two. If you want a close match to the two respectively then look at a PPQ, APX, M&P9, and FNS.

Ding Ding

Vp9 does nothing better than glock. Kys

Not him but it's nicer to shoot at a range. In all other areas I'd say it's equal to glock. Worth the price raise? Depends on the person.

>0 advantages
I guess you like shitty triggers.

My. 40 niggas.
Love my px4 sub. 40. This gs a champ

>source: my ass

Youre a retard. The vp9 is no more mechanically accurate than the glock, while being less reliable. There is nothing it does that makes it "good" and the glock "mediocre" except for your specific tastes which are shit. Kys

Honestly if you're gonna sit there and whine about a literal 5.5 lb glock trigger, you're just a bitch who sucks at shooting. It's not even a heavy long trigger, there is nothing to bitch about. And why don't you do some research on the ww2 gI 1911s being known for their gritty heavy triggers; the recent fad of tightly fit, extremely light trigger 1911s is to appease retards. The ww2 1911s were legitimate combat guns. Modern 1911s are barbie jamomatic pieces of shit. I say this as a glock guy, everytime I see some retard boomer with a 2k$ 1911 shooting shitty 6" groups at 7 yards I just wanna puke in disgust. They took the original brilliant combat design and cucked it for söy retards who don't know the fundamentals

This, but the VP9 IMO.

Are glockfags the most autistic on this board? Everytime I see someone post something lless than positive about them, they always swarm like a pack of niggers to defend their homeboy gun.

>reeee stop bitching Glocks are fine
Glockfags on full defense again.

>it failed when buried in liquid shit
>not worth carrying

Attached: 1532820306936.png (645x729, 105K)

Well I think the Glock is more fun to take to the range. They are about the same price anyways.

People feel obligated to correct retards. Try and make a thread in the same vain about

>Fuckin AR is a jammomatic that gets troops killed! When are we replacing this Matel toy?
>AK has shit accuracy and can't hit the side of a barn with the shooter standing inside
>9mm is a pea shooter. You need a hard hitting man slayer like. 45 to get the job done in 1 shot

You'll get the same responses.

First off, not him.
Second, Glocks are fine.
Third, I can put any pre-charged striker or SA gun (other than the p30, deal with it HK guys) in your hand, have you draw and fire 4 to the torso and 1 to the head in under 4s, and you will have less misses low and left with any of those pistols than you do the Glock. Just the nature of the safe action trigger mechanism.

>less reliable

????????

Just get a SIG. P320 is the chosen striker fire pistol of the US Army. You can change grip modules and slide/barrel kits to suit your needs beyond your primary needs.

Glock triggers have excellent resets maybe you should learn how to properly work a trigger and you wont be low left or high left.

> Chiding other people to learn how to properly work a trigger
> While claiming that reset is why people pull low and left in the exact same sentence
Where you at, bro? If you're near me, we can go shoot some heavy ass all metal SAO guns. They'll blow your mind.

I own a glock 19 (poly 80 technically) and a vp40 which is pretty similar to the 9. Carry both, 6'4 220 and the vp40 prints a little. If you're smol then maybe the sk is a better choice

Post groups

Attached: 111.jpg (3264x1836, 1.65M)

I don't care of you popped those at 25y in 10s, bruv. Kudos if you did. You're mad and thumping your chest because you didn't think before posting that reset caused people to jerk the trigger.

cz p10

Get on my level and then you can tell me about it bro

Attached: 20160723_184518-1.jpg (2531x1606, 688K)

hk

Attached: P30LVP9 6518.jpg (1200x731, 565K)

Don't give this test any thought. Get the VP9. Better ergonomic grip, better trigger, better sights, better finish. Also, consider the FNS-9.

>be me
>nog walks into gas station with hipoint
> "AYO NIGGA EMPTY THAT MUH FUCKIN REGISTER FOR A POP YO ASS"
>pull out my VP9
>drop it in water
>shit
>drop it in sand
>FUCK
>drop it in dirt
>AH JEEZ
>finally get ahold of it, only to drop it once more in diarrhea
>get shot by nog

Nice silencer!

Get a p30sk

kek

I can confirm. I've owned 3 CZ's and I've been disappointed in all of them. I've made enough long winded posts on here about them but they're just meh.

fowtee fahv

>if we put a gun through a completely unrealistic hell test it won't work
>therefore its a bad gun

Attached: hurr.jpg (495x638, 46K)

sure faggot

Attached: oKEnpqL.png (1080x1094, 996K)

where all my Smith bois at

Attached: thumbnail_IMG_3294.jpg (960x1280, 352K)