When are we going to update this stupid piece of paper?

When are we going to update this stupid piece of paper?

Attached: 163974300-2nd-amendment-wallpapers.jpg (900x487, 144K)

Never. There is quite literally nothing wrong with it. The NFA, on the flipside...

Its too late, now that women can vote nothing cool will ever be passed again

That stupid piece of paper is a legal document.

Woman suffrage was the mistake that destroyed America

*destroyed western civilization

Come and take them, faggot.

Thanks, OP. I was meaning to make a thread about this. Militia is not the problem; that's any adult male citizen. It seems to me the seed of the grabber's argument for grabbing is in the 2A itself: "well regulated." This contradicts the last phrase of the amendment: "shall not be infringed."

There is no legal basis for grabber legislation -- CCW loicenses, NFA classifications, prisoners freed but still stripped of their rights -- it is all forbidden by the constitution. Anybody got the infograph that illustrates how the usage of "well regulated" has changed since it was written?

Attached: apubrillian.png (755x708, 31K)

Agree OP, they should update it to make it more clearly and explicitly support an armed populace.

Attached: B42F5E59-3FB9-4950-B8FA-983D819CD616.jpg (818x1024, 119K)

Well regulated in 18th century English means 'functional'

I couldn’t agree more, user. All of that nonsense about a militia should be deleted, leaving just the core statement;
>the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
While we’re at it, we could delete the remaining comma. Make it one solid statement, with no room for misinterpretation or activist judicial revision. I want my cake back, dammit.

That makes total sense, given that we're talking about a functional militia: one that is reasonably capable of resisting tyranny. Means parity with government forces, who for-fucking-sure aren't stacking on doors and serving warrants with pic related.

(pic related)

Attached: californiaAR.jpg (2000x1332, 106K)

Attached: well regulated militia.jpg (1517x1496, 513K)

The day before the start of the Race War, and the end for all wh*tes in America

The fact that so many people say the second amendment is out of date should scare you

Attached: 1550894781603.jpg (411x349, 42K)

And needs to clarify that "people" means whites

You're right, it needs some clarification.

Attached: 2nd revised for clarity.jpg (900x312, 96K)

Forgot the comma.

Attached: 2nd revised for clarity.jpg (900x312, 95K)

Kys faggot.

Attached: 10BD89BB-9CD1-4E71-806D-CA1725196F3F.jpg (487x720, 64K)

Serial commas in legislation are fucking tiresome

THAS RITE, WITEBOI!
WUT YOU GONNA DO ABOUT IT?

Attached: 1551903781617.jpg (900x487, 381K)

Is this going to be a thread based on the "muh muskets"

Attached: second amendment diagram.png (827x628, 79K)

Nothings wrong with it. We just need to teach in schools that your average citizen has a right to own even nuclear, biological, chemical, neurological, etc. weaponry. If you honestly don't think along those lines than your as worthless as the NRA on gun rights

hope not. 2A only authorizes muskets is a blatantly wrong-headed read. 2A protects the natural right of the people to self defense, even against government. that means parity.

Theres literally no reason you need an AR15 or other Hi Cap rifle other than killing other people.

All you should be allowed to have is your bolt actions and shotguns and your pistols. I must admit Conceal carry should be LEGAL and no one should be restricted from carrying pistols. We need them.

But theres like no reason you need an assault rifle. You aren't going to be able to win against the government.
Like the only reason to really need a civilian to have one is to defend the country from foreign invasion and

Like thats totally not happening right now on our southern border and that could never happen otherwise in any other situation.

So come one guys stop wasting money and turn in those MEME15's

All you need is a good bolt action rifle and a 44 on your hip

>You aren't going to be able to win against the government.
t. Loyalist traitor, a spy for the redcoats, and a coward

>There is quite literally nothing wrong with it
I beg to differ. There should be a clause that states that the people are able to own the same kinds of "arms" that the military uses.

we need dem guns to kill whypippo an sheeit

Its time for your nap grandpa

The post was obviously satirical, though the reference to invasion at the southern border is strange considering not a single firearm owner has ever shot a migrant stateside

They needed guns to protect themselves from a tyrannical government that didn’t care about their interests and allowed cops to walk all over them. They worked actively with white groups like the Young Patriots for the joint defense of their communities.

Attached: 27883149-E9AB-41E1-A38A-CEEFC9E9ED33.jpg (754x445, 60K)

First, I'm gonna need the circumference of your neck, gotta make sure that noose is tight.

Modifying the constitution will do nothing because the people infringing on it don't give a shit anyway.

>any of this
No. The BP wanted to "police" their own neighborhood, which simply meant that the police couldn't go into their territory.
In reality this meant that criminals would commit crimes outside of BP held neighborhood's and when perused by the police the BP would show up with guns to intimate the police.

The police (mostly White combat vets) didn't freak out and laws were to be passed preventing this. The BP chimp'd the fuck out and stormed the capital building, which enabled the passing of laws that made open carry illegal. Again niggers fuck everything up.

>bootlicking this hard

>13/50