Scopes

I hunt in some pretty rugged terrain. Lots of steep slopes, slick rocks, dense foliage, etc. I need to know who makes the toughest rifle scopes available. Do I need to go more expensive, or would I be better off getting something cheaper like a Nikon or whatever? Normally I use irons but my eyes aren’t as good as they used to be.

Attached: 7625D163-5552-48C6-8BBC-4885185EDDEE.jpg (1200x755, 93K)

Other urls found in this thread:

opticswarehouse.co.uk/product/schmidt-bender-klassik-8x56-hungarian/
youtube.com/watch?v=3neZx03asfk
youtube.com/watch?v=4bZZTa8M5wI
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

What distance do you usually take game at?

All Dad's old fart hunting buddies in Montana swear by Burris glass. They take a beating and they have a lifetime warrantee.

>Not buying a Swaro Z8i
Might as well suck a fat pile of shit off an AIDS dick while you’re at it

Attached: 1549124780134.gif (1921x1833, 1.12M)

Longest shot is around 150, average is about 80-100

aimpoint

Irons or your a pussy

Irons. If you absolutely must have a scope get an acog.

Toughest? What the mil uses, acog, aimpoint ect
Good enough for you? Anything primary arms imo

Fixed 4x or 6x Leupold FX II or III respectively.

>you're or you're a retard

Are 1" lightweight scopes like the ones made by leupold terrible?

I kind of want to save on weight and get the scope lower to the gun because I want to do an LSS-XL build of a tikka t3x lite and I don't want the gun to be heavy or require a cheek riser.

Leupold. Find one you like and get caps for it. They have a great warranty and are tough as hell.

I like Nikon monarch3

Attached: 1215171806a~4.jpg (1428x3496, 819K)

>I hunt in some pretty rugged terrain. Lots of steep slopes, slick rocks, dense foliage, etc.
My hand me down rifle has a Weaver 7 power and every year after hunting season I want to smash it. I videod it cause it's hard to explain. I want a scope that lets in a shit ton of light. It needs to be a lower power.

Attached: hunt.webm (720x404, 2.89M)

I'm over 40 with shit vision. Been hunting small game a while and decided to go bigger. Got muh durr huntan rifle with irons and took it to the range. Proved I can still shoot < 4 MOA with irons like I could in boot camp. But it's not pleasant. Lots of squinting. So I forward mounted a Simmons 2x handgun scope and it's great.

Looks like WA. I have a nikon p223 fixed 3x on my 6.5 grendel, seems bretty good. I think the short tube is good for light transmission. It might not be tough enough for larger calibers idk.

I wish there were more options in simple fixed scopes.

That's a tough question because the lighting in the hunting stores is not the same as when you're out in the field.

>With Vortex you're paying for the warranty. (cheap)
Given that, I'm quite happy with my razor hd lh in 3.5x10x42.

>With Leupold, you're paying for a product and a warranty. (mid range)
I used a 3xi lrp in 4.5x14?x50 to take shots over a mile (recorded on a cam). It was grainy as fuck at that point, but its doable.

>With Nightforce, you're paying for a product and a warranty. (high end)
I looked through my co-workers nightforce SHV 3-10x42 and it was fantastic. Part of the reason was that it had a 30mm tube and not a 1 inch, which plays a HUGE role.


But with bigger scopes you get more glass, and your whole hunting system gets heavier. Something to keep in mind.

If the store lets you, try to take the scopes outside during the day. Only you will know what is best for you.

>Looks like WA
Alaska
>I wish there were more options in simple fixed scopes.
Yes, or a video scope with a heads up display. It's fucking 2019 we shouldn't be looking through tubes with glass in them.

Attached: IMG_0077.jpg (4032x3024, 2.8M)

>falling for this bait in 2019

kek

I'm looking at getting a Zeiss Conquest 3-15x42 or 3-15x50 But I'm not settled on which reticle to get. Are Ballistic reticles good or should I go with the traditional crosshairs?

Attached: Sketch.png (633x471, 91K)

If you stick to one brand of bullet (or reload) what you can do with a ballistic reticle is know where the impact is on the crosshairs at different yardages.


for example:

Zero for 100 yards
1st hash below your windage line is 200
2nd hash is 300
3rd is 400
4th is 500
etc

Makes hunting SO much easier when you know where your bullet will drop at "X" yards.

You'll have to go to the range and figure out your bullet drop on your own. Since I learned this method I"ll never go back to that bullshit duplex reticle again

>not using 7N1 and a PSO-1 with the ballistic cam matched.

opticswarehouse.co.uk/product/schmidt-bender-klassik-8x56-hungarian/

Schmidt and Bender. Its fixed, good quality and really clear at dusk or dawn.

Iv also dropped mine a lot, its got big bashes but it holds it zero

>not using a mil-dot scope and your brain

S&B is the favourite among european snipers. I used one for pretty consistent >1000m shots.

ACOG. They aren't indestructible, but about as close as glass can get.

SWFA fixed optics are cheap as shit and reasonably durable. I don't think your specified ranges require 3,000 dollar glass or substantial magnification.

Any scope, even the cheapest chink shit can do the job at such a range, and yes they can be very rugged.

youtube.com/watch?v=3neZx03asfk

>they can be very rugged
"can be" is the operative phrase. The thing about cheap chink shit is you don't know if it's going to fail on you until it does. That's why people who aren't poorfags buy things that are known to be well-designed from companies that understand quality control.

I'd love to get a S&B, but it's a bit too expensive for me.

I can get a pretty good deal on the Zeiss HD5 conquest because they're discontinued, some units prefer swapping out their S&B's for Zeiss.

youtube.com/watch?v=4bZZTa8M5wI

This is why I buy Nightforce. I've seen one maintain perfect zero after being taken off and literally used to hammer nails into wood. You can't bust 'em.

leupold or vortex. Leupold for its name. Vortex for its life time warranty