Swords vs guns

Which is deadlier?

Attached: HEgkRmc.png (540x466, 144K)

Gun with a sword is deadlier. Sword with a gun cannot reload without putting the gun down due to it's single armed nature.

This is true, I've seen it firsthand

Wrong, you stupid faggot. The sword with a gun can aim much more precisely with the gun and fire much more rapidly. The gun with the sword would have to put the sword down to manipulate the trigger. Even if the gun with the sword could pull its trigger on its own its still shitting its innards out, basically killing itself, every time it fires.

You forgot one fatal flaw, you assmunch. The sword with a gun has terrible placement of its arm, and as such, can only use one side of it's double-edged sword. Also, due to the arm's height, piercing is out of the question, rendering the entire purpose of an arming sword useless. Meanwhile, the gun with a sword not only can use all three edges, but is also properly balanced, as has the versatility of holding it with one or two hands.

How would they even kill each other? are they alive to begin with? We don't know anything about their anatomy.

Do they both float or do they need to hold themselves up with their single arm?

You dumb cocksucker. Why do you think the gun with a sword would even get close to the sword with a gun? Never bring a gun with a sword to a sword with a gun fight.

Obviously gun with a sword as a gun that size would be firing some really huge bullets which would destroy the sword gun in a single hit.

Meanwhile sword gun would have a tiny gun that could not damage the bulky oversized gun sword.

You're not thinking about this clearly, you autistic shitspasm. There are two different possible scenarios, both of which have the gun with a sword as the clear winner. If both the sword with a gun and the gun with a sword can move of their own volition then that would mean just as the sword with a gun can move / swing itself, then surely the gun with a sword could also aim / shoot itself. Conversely, if neither the sword with a gun nor the gun with a sword care capable of moving without assistance of their arms then the sword with a gun would be entirely incapable of moving whatsoever. Think about it, the sword with a gun's arm trying to carry/swing itself would be as impossible as living yourself by pulling on your own bootstraps. The gun with the sword, however, could use its arm to both aim and shoot itself. The only hope the sword with a gun would have is if it could use its arm/gun to shoot the gun with a sword first, but again this is all under the presumption that the sword with a gun and the gun with a sword cannot move themselves so the sword would just fall over and therefore its arm would have an incredibly difficult time picking itself up to aim in the first place.

You imbecile, you've forgotten that Gun-with-a-sword can shoot with its face and naturally can aim and hit anything it looks at

The sword is merely extra

Additionally, have you SEEN the caliber of his damn face? that shit's thiccer than .45

and we all know how powerful .45 is

>Additionally, have you SEEN the caliber of his damn face? that shit's thiccer than .45
>and we all know how powerful .45 is

It's 45 instead of .45

It has a face?
They are clearly both blind, giving the gun with a sword an advantage as it can wildly swing faster when the sword with a gun approaches.

>sword with gun teleports behind you
>"heh nothing personal kid"

This guy was stabbed to death with a sword. This other guy was shot dead with a gun.
Which one's deader?

You cheap sluts. You are completely ignoring my original point whereby the gun with a sword depends on literally throwing up during combat. Maybe it gets off a first good shot but it all goes downhill after that until its missed every shot and dies after the last one. Like a bumblebee that dies after it has stung someone except the bee isn't a floating entity that would fly backwards uncontrollably from the force of throwing up its lifeforce.

Neither have eyes or legs so I'm not that worried.

The gun holding the sword. Gun can shoot people and swing but the sword can not swing if he is shooting.

Wouldn't a gun with a sword just be a gun with a bayonet?

A magical place

Attached: Excel Test.png (2685x1461, 477K)

Listen here you absolute fucking /d/ lurking degenerate asseating spergslurper, they're clearly possessed weapons as outlined in the DMG. Gun with a sword is not an organic lifeform and isn't killing itself to fire.

Here's another point you weird growth. The sword with the gun's and the gun with a sword's sizes are relative. The caliber of the gun with a sword's vomit bullets is irrelevant because the sword with a gun's size basically makes it a giant steel plate. Secondly, the gun with a sword is based on a 1911 which means its horribly prone to failing and its one arm would then be powerless to rack the slide on its own.