Can we have one German tanks thread without shitflinging?

Can we have one German tanks thread without shitflinging?
My favorite German tank is the Panther, what's yours?

Attached: 81egqYBZaqL.jpg (1331x1000, 343K)

this one

Attached: 5dfab9f2916a5a3d440f7547c7a90214.jpg (3000x1936, 417K)

It would’ve been an objective failure but it still would’ve been fucking cool

Attached: 1A26EE7D-9E09-458B-B36E-2410C97C332F.jpg (645x591, 118K)

So are ya just basically asking for what looks cool and what people have an emotional attachment for?

Ratte is too much autism even for me.

Just talk about German tanks in general without the usual "your favorite tank is shit and you should feel bad for liking it"

Why the Leopard of course.
Its the only one that won a war

No skirts?

Attached: Panzer_III_01.jpg (1200x769, 103K)

>tank designs decided WW2
how to spot a retard

Panzer II. I love early war tanks.

Attached: 300px-Panzer_II_Saumur.jpg (300x200, 19K)

MY FAVORITE GERMAN TANK IS THE SMOLDERING HUSK FULL OF DEAD FASCISTS, DESTROYED BY THE GLORIOUS INVINCIBLE TANKERS OF THE MOTHERLAND

Attached: Clownsoviet.png (404x511, 37K)

My personal favorite is the M4A1 76mm Sherman. Those curves...

Attached: M4A1 76 my baby.jpg (1187x902, 181K)

Klienhilffieshatzekampfwagen

my favourites are the ones that look like this

Attached: Panzer-IV_destroyed-AFV_40.jpg (1200x790, 189K)

M36 was kino that or the German Panther didn't like the t34

Attached: fd08899eda6a37529065c77ee0a87942.jpg (598x375, 53K)

I like the Panzer IV.
>most produced german tank
>proven, reliable design
>remained pretty relevant till the end of the war
Ausf J is pure sex. Dem skirts mang.

Attached: PzIVAusfJ.jpg (800x539, 108K)

indeed

>Ausf J is pure sex
J is budget design tho, peak Panzer IV was Ausf. H

Fuck I even meant Ausf H, but i brainfarted and fucked it up.

There’s something about those skirts that make it so aesthetic

>how to spot a retard

Does not know who won the cold war

sturmtiger

Marder and 2A4 are both treadkino

Attached: chilly.jpg (640x424, 95K)

shit tank

Attached: short skirt.jpg (480x454, 30K)

Mmmm... short skirts.

Attached: St-Jean-CMR-Leopard-1-TWH-50--DSCN1286.jpg (1171x272, 147K)

Still has forward-mounted transmission, but at least no
>interleaved
idiocy

Attached: pzkpfwiii-iv-einheitsfahrgestell.png (1811x2653, 379K)

What would an actual E50 look like had they been produced? And would it have aesthetic skirts?

Attached: images.jpeg-1.jpg (298x169, 10K)

Probably look like in WoT with stock turret and 88mm L/71 gun.

Attached: 18834_rd.jpg (800x515, 61K)

One on the left is the A1 cast hull. Better survival, more costly construction.
You can see the same thing with some very early M3 Lees

speaking of such wunderwaffen, would anyone mind if I asked something that didn't feel like it warrant it's own thread?

I'm working on a bit of an alternate history setting where, during the inter-war period, a game-changing discovery of Adamantine was made. Adamantine's characteristics include being twice as strong* as steel while only a third the weight and ultimately being relatively easy to produce (think only pennies more per-kilogram than normal steel).

And I'm trying to imagine just some of the changes that along would bring, I figure among them, things like the Panzer VIII Maus would have been feasible (since it's weight could have ended up a far more reasonable 62 or so tonnes). But I also wonder if useage of such a metal would have generally seen all tanks get bigger since the increase in durability means bigger guns are needed and with such a light weight to the metal, the tanks would HAVE to be bigger to not blow themselves over from their own cannon fire? (or just lead to designs that involve much wider footprints)

*Yes, I'm aware in metallurgy 'stronger' can be kind of a hazy term since hardness can lead to brittleness and such.

Attached: 1414834161422.jpg (1400x990, 986K)

>Marder
Based

Damn I wish all those thousands of Marders hadnt been destroyed over the last few years.

This one.
> Kwk 43
> The gun that hardly fits on the KT
No.

Attached: spaehpz_m41-001.jpg (600x278, 58K)

Original applique were 5mm plates. The J model is just wire to prevent HEAT warheads and reduced engine load. Panzer H's still literally had the same 300HP Panzer III engine in them.

beachtet mich nicht, bin nur am durchfahren

Attached: childrenarmor.jpg (850x662, 97K)

How did East Germans quickly turn from Nazis into Commies?

all tanks are human sardine cans

well, if you are authoritarian and an authority tells you to do something...
you follow orders

They didnt, it took a really long time infact

The interleaved system wasn't as bad as propaganda says. It allowed tanks like the Tiger and King Tiger, 60-70 ton tanks, to have cross country speeds equal to a sherman. Later they realized they didn't really need that many wheels, so the E50, E75 and E100 went with overlapped roadwheels, which is probably the best system at that time for producing such heavy tanks.

If the allies had tried producing 50-70 tonn tanks, they would have failed much harder than the Germans, trust me. Only Germany was able to build a 68 ton tank that could go 35 km/h, as the suspension and roadwheels spread the weight evenly. When everything worked with the Panther and Tiger, they were miracle tanks, as told by their crews, but they were a beast to maintain and repair. Later design improvements, like the E50 and E75, would make them much simpler to construct and repair, while maintaing most of the quality, but Germany lost before they could

They didn't. They just pretended to be commies and became nazis again once commies were gone.

The A1 hull is just so smooth. I love it compared to the A2-A3 W I D E B O Y hulls. The extended 76 turret is just... pure sex.

Attached: overlord-museum-colleville-sur-mer-m4a1-sherman-tank-1944.jpg (650x341, 59K)

Were there any kind of insurgency against the Russians?

Only very minor stuff like setting depots on fire, putting up wires on throat level and other Werhwolf shit that didn't change anything.

either the panzer iv or this baby. love how low-profile it is

Attached: stug ausf f.jpg (1024x605, 95K)

This bad boy. Can fit so many nazis in it.

Attached: Maus IV.jpg (1500x1000, 424K)

Beautiful

I won't believe you until you slap the hood.

this absolute beauty

Attached: 28448018438_ca06bfd265_b.jpg (1024x683, 435K)

this one makes my wewe the big wewe

Attached: 465346534543.jpg (619x272, 37K)

>Better survival
Where are you getting this information? Cast armor is weaker than rha in equal thicknesses.

>dat schurzen

Attached: jagdtiger.jpg (480x358, 33K)

I mean in 1953 there was an uprising of the workers in the "worker's and farmer's state" (Arbeiter- und Bauernstaat), but other then that the CIA backed West German attempts at creating secret stay behind groups and other sleeper cells (think Operation Gladio) failed massively. The DDR made it public and used it as a propaganda tool, since the West German(CIA) goups often recruited veteran cripples and such, since they wouldn't have been drafted and also failed in the original goal to make them radio operators, since they themselves didn't have enough radios or training.

Attached: 1503737178526.jpg (1987x1286, 225K)

It was a vicious cycle: the system allowed for heavier vehicles, which in turn required the system and so on...
Better that the krauts had just stayed with beefed-up Pz. II/III/IV-style bogies.

VK GANG

Attached: Vk3002.jpg (1200x675, 52K)

Posting what i got

Attached: Soviet_Captured_Panthers_T-V.jpg (967x610, 128K)

Attached: stug III 7 experimental 1.jpg (549x484, 131K)

Attached: Tiger(p)_1.jpg (742x441, 63K)

no

Attached: 1446265978406.jpg (1069x714, 135K)

huh. Looks like some sort of launcher tube, like a PIAT.

Attached: 1546392343435.jpg (835x735, 117K)

Hell yeah, Pz.III bois!

Attached: Screenshot_20190307-180814~2.png (971x702, 916K)

Don't listen to lies, Operation Werewolf was successful commies just covered it up

Attached: 2.jpg (600x450, 37K)

>Ausf J is pure sex

Monkey models are good now?

>Better survival

With weaker armor at an inferior angle to the M4A3 75(W)? You really willing to die on that hill?

I don't think so.

>monkey model
How can something like a Pz IV be a monkey model? There were no export variants to my knowledge.

Attached: hitlerdissapoint.jpg (137x150, 22K)

Attached: Panzer IV.jpg (1688x1181, 434K)

Attached: Panzer IV inside.jpg (1000x709, 128K)

>be ebil nadzis
>losing badly to the red slav tide, mutt menace and rotten teeth brigade
>take Panzer IV
>remove everything necessary like a turret drive, decent exhaust, pistol ports / side hatches, face hardened armor, decent side skirts etc etc
>IDS NOT A MONKEY MODEL BECAUSE IT WASN'T EXPORTED

Whatever you say pal. It's literally a downgrade from previous iterations.

Attached: 1533311549777.jpg (636x602, 22K)

Attached: Panzer IV 3242343456554.jpg (1280x870, 150K)

Attached: Panzer IV.jpg (1280x800, 180K)

Attached: Panzer IV Oulu 1944.jpg (1280x896, 221K)

Attached: Panzer IV Soviet.jpg (1000x666, 165K)

whoa dude, I knew they removed the turret drive, but not all that other stuff. but I will argue
>IDS NOT A MONKEY MODEL BECAUSE IT WASN'T EXPORTED
a monkey model, in general context, refers to a purposefully downgraded version for export to foreign militaries?
That has been my impression for the past decade.

Attached: bmptruck.jpg (1024x768, 116K)

Attached: Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-277-0835-29,_Russland,_Panzer_IV_und_Infanterie.jpg (800x574, 53K)

>purposefully downgraded version for export to foreign militaries

At that point it might as well have been.

Is that putin?

Attached: Panzer IV Captured-Ger-armour-Efront.jpg (1200x806, 235K)

True, but that was a result of wartime production limitations, was it not? I believe there to be a distinct difference of making a profit on an exported product, and a product of inferior quality due to material constraints.
I would just call it a downgrade and call it a day

Attached: Panzer IV AdvthroughHoll-Belg40.jpg (1024x591, 155K)

Attached: Panzer IV AF.jpg (800x701, 152K)

This is the correct definition. A tank being shitty does not make it a monkey model.

shit tanks that a potato farming peasants could disable with a ptrd-41

Attached: sovet_soldati_s_ptrd_41_sfridlyand.b5rb57zk6pwgosc0880gwcc84.ejcuplo1l0oo0sk8c40s8osc4.th.jpg (800x515, 240K)

Did they really have a Child Panzer division?

>I believe there to be a distinct difference of making a profit on an exported produ

Thats not why monkey models exist friend.

Oh fuck this got me good

Pistol ports and side hatches were removed because their openings which were free on earlier models were covered by Schürzen as of the Ausführung H. The "decent" side skirts being replaced by mesh also were mostly a weight saving measure since the main threat from infantry weapons no longer were the Russian AT rifles but rather hollow charges like PIATs or bazookas, these were not downgrades but rather production streamlining that made sense.
I'll give you the exhaust and turret drive though.

>industry completely fucked
>i-it's streamlining!
>w-w-weight saving

Do love me some historical historical revisionism

I’d say it’s accurate to call it a monkey model. The Germans were losing and needed to cut corners in order to keep production up.
The result was a tank that was built along the same lines but was inferior.
A monkey model.

It is exactly why monkey models exist. So that countries like Russia and USA dont get their fancy composite armor copied or studied by foreign entities, like we saw with the six day war with Pattons going to the Russians, and T-62s to the Americans.

My favorite german vehicles are also the ones that are destroyed.
A well-placed grenade would also work.

Attached: Tiger tank.jpg (728x452, 86K)

Edgy, I know I'm probably talking to a tankie but the nazi war machine produced some decent tanks. You dont have to be a wheraboo to appreciate WWII armor types.

>but the nazi war machine produced some decent tanks.
which

>which
Panzer I-VI

jagdpanzer 4, jagdpanther, panzer 4 with the long barrel, hertzer, tiger 1, late model panthers, panzer 3, stug 3. just off the top of my head.

Like literally any armored vehicle ever made, they all had strengths and weaknesses but overall their performance and capabilities generally outweighed their costs, at least when initially deployed and more often then not their weaknesses (mainly logistical) were excabberated massively by influences outside of their control.

>Jagdpanzer 38(t)
>panzer III, IV, V
>tiger I, II
>Sturmgeschütz III
To name a few, they performed their roles well and many proved very capable against allied armor like the T-34 and KV-1. Most of the limitations of the late war vehicles had more to do with logistical and industrial limitations of Germany than they did the design.

Attached: 1542162017788.jpg (4242x3000, 3.56M)

>influences outside of their control.

>industrial limitations of Germany

Panzer I-IV
StuG/StuH guns
They made good use of captured equipment.

The rest of their domestic designs suffered from a myriad of issues. Even the Jagdpanzer 38t suffered from abysmal ergonomics.

>let's pretend the allied war effort did nothing to hurt the amount of raw materials and the infrastructure to create.
Either a brainlet or chink trying to play of the ideological divide.