Watch that video in the OP. How the fuck could anything survive that?
Gabriel Sanchez
Phillipines
Isaac Gonzalez
since coast guard are operating within US borders and very close to land, they would be very close to US land based aircraft and friendly support systems any attacker would be a long way from any kind of support or supply
unless the attackers were subs or carriers, then the coast guard would have a huge advantage over their foes
Hunter James
Chinese Coast Guard has bigger ships than American Coast Guard.
Gavin Jenkins
if your ciws is your only anti air, you may as well have no anti air at all.
Joshua Jenkins
they were removed from coast guard inventory in 2012, only the navy has those weapons now.
Nicholas Hall
>gets sunk from 400 miles away by anti ship missile
Lucas Barnes
>since coast guard are operating within US borders False, the Coast Guard currently has ships patrolling off Africa, the Black Sea, and the Persian Gulf Why? What’s wrong with the CWIS?
Julian Torres
That’s a lie
Gavin Jackson
That’s the point of having a CWIS... to shoot down the anti-ship missle
Isaac Brown
Technically they've been deployed in a lot of places, even the Persian Gulf. They also operate at pretty distant stations and US territories.
PLACG ships require extra volume to allow for counter-flooding. Otherwise they develop serious list when doors fail.
Robert Turner
False. I see them on the cutters moored in the Harbor all the time.
OP’s question is dumb. USCG exists basically as a federal law enforcement agency and safety service for American coastal waters. Most of what they do is drug interdiction, followed by medical response and search and rescue.
They don’t have military grade anti ship missiles, or anti submarine weapons. Probably don’t even have sonar.
>military grade anti ship missiles They are designed to be outfitted with the Harpoon anti-ship missle launchers >FLEO It says right on their website..
Are you retarded? the type 054 frigate came out like more than 10 years ago
Nolan White
Like anything, even computers aren't perfect. A CIWS DOES have a possibility to fail, especially when 2 or more missiles come its way within close proximity of eachother. As much as he's probably not the best source, Tom Clancy did a nice analysis of it in Red Storm Rising during the chapter when the russian Bears launch cruise missiles disguised as drones at the Nimitz. An turret's AI can be tricked very easily, and this isn't a world where the bad guy only launches one, climatic, end-all-be-all missile...
chinks not only did you copy, you made a smaller and shittier version
Juan Bailey
and that costa guard cutter has been around longer
Michael King
the phalanxs true power is classified, like very classified
but its main advantages are that it is completely self contained weapon, ammo, fire control, and radar guidance are all contained in a single unit its not completely fool proof, but its definitely effective especially when used as part of a very deep combat layer
even as a standalone weapon, its much better than nothing and way more effective than manually aimed M240s their self-contained nature makes them very good at being mounted on even small vessels with primitive fire control, allowing a fleet to have a very good missile defence for its size as well and forcing the enemy to waste so many missiles on vessels as small as the coast guard is a strategic bonus
Cameron Sanders
The fucking Canadian ""Navy"" could sink the coastniggers. You either have VLS, or your crab food.
Jonathan Harris
Oh look. Radars and light cannons and some machine guns. Totally a surface warfare ship equipped for line combat. Wait no. It’s mission is to engage smaller craft and it has no missiles.
The majority of the USCG operations are drug interdiction and maritime safety/rescue/medical and law enforcement. They are very much oriented to that role.
Grayson Perry
Anything Russian and below
Owen Harris
>Phalanx CIWS >failed during only combat use ever against ancient missile