Hmmm what are we thinking Jow Forums

hmmm what are we thinking Jow Forums

Attached: ss (2019-03-18 at 07.25.07).png (1179x720, 475K)

Canard controlled Attack drone

>flying AK-47

I mean... it already is an unicorn, might as well be a pegasus.

I'm thinking Arby's.

just drop the fuckers on my house so I can finally have an authentic izhmash

>not gimballed
>Needs to fly directly at target to engage it, limiting attacks to ~3 seconds and requiring a minute of altitude gain in-between, and subjecting it to all of the flight turbulence

It is just Vladimir Putin trolling us.

Attached: 1546671343722.jpg (1024x915, 97K)

It's a Saiga, it's an anti drone drone using a shotgun to its face.

This makes it cheap and easy to make.

EPIC free helicopter rides maymay! you should go post in on facebook

>cheap and quick to build
imagine 100s of thousands of these swarming a target.
who cares if they are accurate or even if you lose a ton. would be scary as fuck to see the sky darken with these

Attached: 1470341832842.jpg (800x579, 154K)

seems like alot of work when you could just have one same sized drone with a bomb that weighs the same as an ak in it

Meh, I can see the utility.

drop 50-200 of these on a concentrated target and have them mag dump on a timer/altimeter would be effective and cheap as fuck. Would probably reduce damage on sensitive targets.

Obviously with the MIC theres little incentive to seek unconventional methods for the sake of reducing costs

Way, way cheaper.

yeah i know making a bomb is way cheaper than making an ak

no

>be innaplane
>something starts flying towards you
>it spits 30 rounds of 7.62x39 at your cockpit
>before crashing into your leg wing
Based af

how expensive do you think bombs are? literal chemicals mixed in a barrel vs stamping, casting, milling, heat treating, and assembling a rifle and its ammo with materials that by them selves cost more than the bombs. even if there were an extreme surplus of rifles the effectiveness vs just using the bomb would be enough

reeeeeing about AK designations is lamer than reeeeeing about clipazines

imagine being this guy

Attached: 1478613856039.png (803x469, 30K)

He made a joke, you're the retard reeeeeing about nomenclature

>how expensive do you think bombs are?

Thousands and thousands.

The reduced structural damage to sensitive targets would be worth it alone.

Sergi, Kalishnakov is of good use, but it lacks flying. You see if Kalishnakov is of flying, then it is moving of greater speed and then the bullets are moving of greater speed. And the Imperialist dies better, yes?

Attached: russianscientificgenius.jpg (1200x911, 432K)

Pretty sure you could make a pipe gun capable of mag dumping once for less than $50 each.

You dont need a milled and heat treated gun for single use you mong.

>$50
wow so still more expensive tthat a handgrenade?
well it doesnt have to be super awesome explosives either.

>thousands and thousands
do you a single fact to back that up?

imagine being a commie punk? I'd rather not

Attached: 5533773d9c88f46a8e6bc1f6687875fadedec00e69a3b88953964e86cfef8b3e.jpg (218x232, 10K)

still not as cheap as some bs nitrate shit and sulphur and a simple detonator

It's only ridiculous until it works.

This.

Its just anti drone. Instead of nets, its birdshot upclose.

When you need an A10 on a budget.

What did he mean by this

Looks like the commie shill is mad

Attached: 1516205025947.jpg (889x960, 160K)

Its just another a russian bomber prototype

Read 1972, dipshit