I would not seriously consider this unless it was a last ditch resort but a friend of mine said he could sustain about 100 men if he were to form a civilian militia. Again this is largely hypothetical at the moment but he told me if anything did happen I could join his group. I hope we don't see this happen but it got me thinking.
What would the tactics look like? How would the war be fought? Obviously I don't think conventional warfare on American soil would be the case. Would the war be fought in the suburbs, in the cities or out in the wilderness away from heavily populated areas?
How would die in such a conflict? Would we see war crimes on both sides?
A complete clusterfuck where no one knows who is on who's side, and constant fighting ensues in a free-for-all with the complete collapse of law and order. Eventually warlords will carve out their own new sovereign states among the territory, and the USA will be dead forevermore.
It would be fought everywhere all the time. It would be ugly and there would be foreigners. The lights would go out, the water would stop flowing and their wouldn't be bread on the shelves. The weak would die quickly and every one else soon after
Jayden Gonzalez
There will be a lot of livestreams and GoPro footage to enjoy
Ryder Taylor
Would mostly be rural vs cities with at least four sides left wing, right wing, anti-government, and pro government. Pro government would ultimately have all the big guns and slowly regain power over each area because the other side's would be to busy either fighting each other or starving to death.
Jose Mitchell
>what would it look like Kinda like the balkans kinda like the Russian revolution and kinda like Vietnam all in one
Dylan Diaz
And none of us will have working internet to watch them.
> he could sustain about 100 men if he were to form a civilian militia.
Unless your friend has some serious cash or acreage, I'm going to call bullshit on that claim. Feeding, clothing, and arming 100 men is expensive as fuck.
Alexander Thomas
The trick is to finish off the opposite side before the government can stabilize the situation, and do some basic opsec/coverup so the government is too busy/desperate/hopeful things will settle down to hunt your side afterwards.
Caleb Powell
And the footage would be banned everywhere else
Zachary Hernandez
The US is the sole importer of aid and many good to both Central and south America, Africa, and South East Asia. The US is the only power making russia or china think before they meddle in their spheres of influence. And the vast majority of food aid in the world is made on american soil in the form of corn subsidies and surplus flour.
people will compare it to the Balkans in a hot burn or South Africa/Nambia/Rhodesia, in a slow burn, but honestly with the reliance of the rest of the world on us as much as it is and the shear amount of nukes, if it DID happen western powers would flood every morsel they could to come and stop the eventual flood that would follow, people like Macron who have previously hated us would suddenly get very comfy with trump. This is because most of the world knows that without the US, you lose the last pillar holding up the west's social welfare, post war paradise that both Europe and AUS-NZ have enjoyed for an almost half century.
If it was in their power they would do anything in their power to prevent something like this from happening to start with. You are talking about a civil war that would rage for decades. The Mississippi River Delta is the #1 most fertile soil on earth period, America has more arms than most of the world, factor those both and you have the potential for almost endless total war.
Some sadists look at that and go "thats wonderful", the realist in me says "and thats why it would never happen."
If the deep state exists to even one fraction to what people predict, they are geared toward keeping this rusty boat sailing no matter the cost. If anything it will be a slow burn as the socialists slowly subvert everything and at most a single state may attempt succession... for about a month before it is put down really fucking quick and its forgotten about 2 months later.
>what would a second american civil war look like? A lot like the the bushwhacking campaigns during the first Civil War. Essentially you'd have small groups of guys armed to the teeth doing raids and ambushes against the other side. Some lone wolfs, some more "conventional" forces. Only instead of percussion cap muskets and revolvers you'd see a lot more ARs and foreign/domestic equipment from whoever is supplying the militia.
Sebastian Jackson
Okay it's probably less than that but still a good size number of men probably 20ish men. I'd have to ask him again sometime. I'm not trying to bullshit you on this. I vaguely recall him saying 100 but I think it might be less. Sorry.
Leo Lopez
>endless total war. >Some sadists look at that and go "thats wonderful" :) >the realist in me says "and thats why it would never happen." :(
Dylan Jenkins
Like the Troubles, only on a larger scale. Maybe some elements of the military would go rouge. There would be some conventional fighting, but for the most part it wouldnt be a conventional shooting war.
Oliver Gutierrez
It would be extremely shitty.
The coasts would be cut off from a lot of supplies they need in order to sustain major cities (food, water, Jow Forums loves to harp on about this point constantly). Riots and "terrorist" attacks would be commonplace.
Red states would have to deal with extremely angry, relatively well-armed clusters of "blue supporters". A majority of Memphis, Atlanta and New Orleans, for instance, are black, and I'd doubt they'd take kindly to Jow Forums rolling into town "ironically" waving the stars and bars.
War crimes would likely be relatively limited in comparison to the likes of Serbia but I don't really think that'd matter considering the proliferation of social media. Imagine the outrage that one New Zealand-esque Antifa/Neo-Nazi attack could do. That's all you really need.
Many blues would quickly realize that it was a bad idea not to embrace 2A. Many reds would likely realize that having a 15 pimped out AR15s doesn't mean shit if you're a fat baby boomer who needs to stop every 10 minutes to catch their breath.
War is delightful for those who haven't experienced it.
Luke Garcia
it would look like fucking northern ireland probably. IE: a lot of stupid uncessary violence
Carter Robinson
I don't know but we are going to find out soon.
Grayson Bell
>blacks getting shit done
I don't see it, user. Nor are rural whites likely to enter cities when they're got 90% of what they need available without them.
IMO reds will initially wreck the cities with power/water sabotage, and the hardened survivors of blue will rise from the wreckage and turn the tables to seize food supplies.
Colton Cooper
>The coasts would be cut off from a lot of supplies they need in order to sustain major cities (food, water, Jow Forums loves to harp on about this point constantly). Riots and "terrorist" attacks would be commonplace.
remember these are coastal cities, the second Europe or any other nation that has vested interest in the current federal government staying afloat are able to, they will send all the food aid they can.
Don't under-estimate the left-majority coasts. They're the ones with connections
Gavin Turner
I just want it to happen so we can all sing Dixieland without getting funny looks
Brayden Hall
>The coasts would be cut off from a lot of supplies they need lol sounds good >Red states would have to deal with extremely angry, relatively well-armed clusters of "blue supporters" hi points and Kel Tec carbines don't qualify as "well-armed", but would at least make the conflict sporting >War crimes would likely be relatively limited I guess that's nice >Many blues would quickly realize that it was a bad idea not to embrace 2A. based >fat baby boomer who needs to stop every 10 minutes to catch their breath also based. fuck boomers >It would be extremely shitty I dunno, it doesn't sound too shitty to me
Bentley Cooper
full scale ground operations wouldnt work, or more accurately wouldn't last. Too much ground and logistics to cover and the only reason the first civil war lasted was because you had states supply and organize their own militaries. A few thousand bubbas with ARs and gucci glocks wont amount to much. It'll most likely be civil unrest and domestic terrorism like we've seen in places like Ireland, lots of sneak attacks and mob rule with an occupying force batteling it out until sombody gets tired and quits.
IDK how the military would hold up. I see so mnay different walks of life in the army the only thing keeping the cluster fuck "in line" is the chain of command. Same goes for the different states. It would be interesting to see how they would react to one another, but deep down I think most states are cucked so we'd be dealing with sunday bloody sunday 2.0 IMO
I know this will go against the grain here, but the "Second American Civil War" is, and will remain, a delusional right wing fantasy conceptualized, thought about, wrote about, and prayed for by boomer arfcommers and edgy tacticool LARPers. There is no realistic scenario in which a large enough segment of the population decides it is in their best interest to start killing another group in a large, organized manner consistent with the concept of "Civil War." The first American Civil War proceeded due to a variety of factors, but it was a realistic scenario because a lot of money and political will to separate a large geographic area from the sovereignty of the federal government existed in support of the CSA and the ideals/policies they enacted. The boomer memes of "The People" killing "Not the People" in some anarchic upheaval against The Libs is no more than a masturbatory violence fantasy fueled by too many Jow Forums threads.
It took a decade of starvation under King Louis before a large enough rebellion took hold. They didn't all care about the high minded principles of the revolution- they were starving and wanted their lives back. See: the immediate establishment of the Emperor.
The American Revolution succeeded because a bunch of rich fucks stood to benefit greatly from the new government's policies. See: the backgrounds of the major financiers of the first Congress and the officers of the new military.
The CSA was funded and supported by the southern elites because if slavery were abolished, they would lose a significant amount of money and the economy would be fucked.
In the USA, nobody's lives are so terrible that years of anarchy, death, and war are worth the cost of overthrowing the government, or establishing a new one. Nobody stands to make money from it either, even major MIC prime contractors: they depend too much on the current status quo.
Jonathan Hill
>Jesus Christ.
Asher Morgan
Your friend is a retard for thinking he could, fresh out of whatever basement he is currently watching anime in, command a small company of poorly trained, poorly equipped/sustained, and undisciplined infantry in a sustained wartime environment.
Benjamin Ward
It all depends on who's fighting who.
If it's antifa vs stormfags or some dumb shit like that, the FBI can probably handle it. If it's an actual attempted revolution with popular support, or a secession attempt, or a racial conflict, then the military will get involved and things will go pear shaped in a hurry.
A few general observations:
The US is too big for a foreign entity to successfully impose their own client government on the population. This is the same reason that the US completely failed to prevent the communists from winning either the Russian or Chinese Civil Wars, there were simply too many people in the country for that to be possible at any acceptable cost. Whoever wins the war will win because they have superior organization and are better at mobilizing political support within America, not because of foreign sugar daddies alone.
Civil Wars tend to induce dramatic economic declines. If America experiences sustained political violence, you can expect a Great Depression tier stock market crash, followed by a credit crunch, bank failures, and possibly the complete collapse of industrial supply chains. This will dramatically weaken the ability of the state to finance military operations and to maintain its own legitimacy.
For the same reason that foreign powers can't impose an unpopular government on America, it will be impossible for an unpopular government to hold onto power by force of arms. Current American counterinsurgency manuals prescribe a minimum strength of 20 troops for every thousand civilians in an insurgent effected area. In order to pacify America, this would mean a counterinsurgent force of around seven million men would be required.
There has never been a full scale civil war in a country with nuclear weapons. Theoretically, the permissive action link system should prevent silo operators and other nuclear personnel from being able to detonate nuclear warheads without the permission of the central government, but who knows.
I really hope the USA gets clusterfucked that way. It would also end the jewish control over the US and hence make it possible to get rid of the shitskins, niggers and jews that migrated to Europe. All the open border bullshit comes from the US and all their shlomos and bergs The fall of the USA is key to the freedom of a white Europa. The american society would also learn how it is to get its own society and country destroyed with nothing left working. A nation of majorily fat and overweight spoiled idiots really needs this.
Jayden Lewis
honestly it would look like most modern civil wars. meaning hit and run tactics by guerilla units at the most, but most likely just terrorist activities. you have to realize that you aren't going to be "fielding an army" so much as developing an insurgency. so committing sabotage against infrastructure (train tracks, bridges, etc) for economic damage, using any civilian casualties as propaganda against the state as well as justification for counterattack, and retaliation against small forces of soldiers or police to encourage them to not comply with orders for fear of being killed pointlessly. A modern civil war being an exercise of insurgency, it's extremely important to win the hearts and minds of the people. This isn't as complex as you would think, you just have to give them no reason to hate you. So DO NOT EVER target the power grid, local political structures, or civilian targets no matter how strategic they may be. The war is merely the backdrop for elections, and you need to make the incumbent government your enemy POLITICALLY so that they are voted out. That is the victory in a civil war. Not overthrow, simply change. The insurgent forces must always have the flavor of resistance, never going on the offensive against soft targets unless with the clearest moral reasons that the people would understand. "Rebels ambushed a police checkpoint? Don't have much sympathy honestly, did you hear about the kids that were killed in that raid?" This high lights a major advantage of the American social landscape that often a lot of people on Jow Forums bitch about: the anti-police sentiment in America arising out of police brutality and the history of racism and grievances against the criminal justice system. The moral victory is already for an insurgent group if they're able to be patient and time their counterattacks such that it looks like resistance fighting back against this evil thing we've always hated, rather than just some yahoos.
Nigga, the whole point of guerrilla warfare employed by Special Forces is to take a ragtag group of insurgents, and turn them into a paramilitary, or even full blown conventional fighting force. Think of it like a mafia, you own towns and cities, those towns and cities pay “taxes” to you. You could also seize industrial sites to have your own source of oil and industry to manufacture your own ammo and shit. If a second civil war were to happen, it would be most likely a hybrid war with insurgents and guerrillas supplementing larger conventional forces taking and holding ground. Taxing and extorting the local populace.
What? Literally none of that sounded that bad. That would be an incredibly civil Civil War. Compare with Syria and Iraq where you had a literal doomsday cult fighting everyone to capture sex slaves like Muslim Mad Max.
Isaiah Rogers
You make a good second point, but I think it's an incredibly stupid move to underestimate your "opponents", if you insist on thinking like that. Blacks have had to deal with a lot more shit over the years then bougie hipster antifas, and I feel that experience should count for something. Plus if you know your choice is fighting or the rope, it motivates you a lot harder
Also:
>We'll just strut into this urban area where we are heavily despised and seen as an occupational force, this has never gone wrong in the history of the US military.
I'm also presuming each side is looking for victory, instead of some form of balkanization
Angel Young
>not developing your own encrypted SDR networks with whatever frequency and bandwidth to use in the wake of ignored FCC regulations considering the state of things
This is an excellent way to have the NSA track down you down and then have the CIA drone strike you.
Bentley Gray
>I'm also presuming each side is looking for victory, instead of some form of balkanization Balkanization would be a victory tho.
Jaxon Torres
>Plus if you know your choice is fighting or the rope, it motivates you a lot harder No matter what niggers have encountered in the past or not. After all, they stay sub 80 IQ niggers and this alone, will prevent them from getting things done for real. After all shops, stores and malls are looted, niggers will most likely be starving and will be decimated through their own behavior.
Colton Phillips
I thinks after some fighting between political groups (right and left) some important military general would stage a coup and over take the government and assert himself as the dictator of the united states killing democracy until an uprising kills him
Jaxson Anderson
read a book niggar Civil War Two: The Coming Breakup of America by Thomas W. Chittum
>Would we see war crimes on both sides >war crimes on both sides >on both sides >on both >both user, there are going to be thousands of sides and it will be the greatest clusterfuck in human history.
best comment so far. After all, the US is a non white country and if it gets sacrified for the greater good, i guess that most white americans are willing to pay the price.
It's not illegal to rig a shit-tier faux-Internet in your basement, is it?
Liam Roberts
No one cares if it is legal or not. In an SHTF scenario such as a civil war, don't expect getting a ticket either if you park your car incorrectly.
Carter Brown
and those insurgents need to be supported, I.E. our entire foreign policy during the cold war. You certainty could wage hell with small arms and guerrilla warfare but that'll only do so much. We also tried that SF tactic with mexico, and low and behold the cartels paid the insurgents we trained better than the mexican government and they switched teams. Thats how the Los Zeats became a thing
Kevin Howard
The US is already somewhat parted up. California, Texas and Nevada pretty much belong to Mexico now. If a civil war breaks out, be sure the beaners will instantly claim "their" soil.
Gabriel Fisher
A constitutional convention would do it. States will fight for their money, when the money falls out so will support. Boomers will die and take the world they built with them. States grew fat on 10% per year governmental growth. States need that 10% governmental spending or the debt they took out needs to be bailed out but from where. The shear size of the underlining debt is a civil war waiting to happen. Either all government gets cuts by 90% or the inflation will cut the government for them. The world of the 20th century was built on lies, debt and treason. Nothing is sustainable, it all must come tumbling down. Math doesn't care, there is no money without debt growth and debt can't grow at 10% a year forever.
Adam Campbell
>korbel Wow what a baller
Brody Mitchell
Tell me again why fights over money don't cause wars.
Jason Ortiz
When you have thousands of paramilitary fighters on your side with dozens, of not hundreds of towns and cities with people who can pay taxes for you and can work the factories for you. That includes ammo factories, oil refineries, even car plants that can get retrofitted to makes armored vehicles. As long as you have the manpower and know how to defend these assets, than you can have your logistics.
Josiah Mitchell
>the hardened survivors of blue will rise from the wreckage and turn the tables to seize food supplies. You would then have a guerilla war that would make Vietnam look like child's play and would go on for years.
>They're the ones with connections This is true and it is a major factor that most people don't consider. That being said I can see a ton of sabotage operations going on in most major port cities. Not every coastal enclave is all the way blue and I'm sure there'll be plenty of pissed off right leaning people looking to cause as much chaos in the city as they can. This can be by inciting racial violence or fucking with logistics. The supplies will be coming in but not without a heavy ammount of fuckery due to power outages, blown bridges, sabotaged trucks, and other vital logistical equipment needed to get supplies off of the ship and to the places they are needed. Piracy and privateering would also make a strong comeback. In places like Florida, Virginia, and the more remote parts of the Chesapeake in Maryland. There are only a few cities I would consider genuinely fucked without any hope. >atlanta >los angeles >austin All three are surrounded by people who hate their guts. LA might make it through because it has access to the ocean and is relatively close to a major naval base but if the aquifers are cut off and freshwater can't be shipped in the city will be a nightmare. Gang violence would break out overnight and fires would cause an incredible ammount of damage. The past string of wildfires caused a tremendous ammount of damage. Imagine if there were more, purposefully set and with a limited supply of water for the fires to be fought.
James Miller
We should just give it to them desu.
Jack Nelson
I concede that your scenario is more realistic. But, notably, your scenario does not include any of the popular "Rural white men TAKING BACK THE COUNTRY" so much as a fracturing of federal control over the country, which will be more akin to the Romans leaving Britain than the Balkans removing each other.
Levi Roberts
This would need a somewhat homogenious working society, which is not the case in the US. Since at least 5 decades, the american society is pretty much patrted up and i guess that latinos and niggers will refuse to work for a militia that isn't consiting from "their" people. Especially the last ten years have shown how divided the country is. To eventually clean an area of non conformed people will be an impossible task in itself in most areas considered the weapons and ammo available to civilians. It could take years to accomplish this. Unless it's done, no supply chain will be secured, nor will some industries being used in a larger scale to supply a militia or an entire regional army.
Camden Nelson
>National Debt gaining on WWII levels during an economic “recovery” and relative peacetime >Budget deficits skyrocketing >Most manufacturering outsourced to other countries >Widespread unironic support for socialism >Extreme racial and political division >Massive personal, corperate and student debt >Huge recent societal value shift and the introduction of social media, the effects of which are completely unknown >Huge racial demographic shift Guys, the US economy is going to hit the fan and culturally it could not have come at a worse time. I don’t know if it will turn into Boogaloo or Serbia or whatever, but the old addage that weak men make hard times will come true. The boomers and Gen Xers were weak. They have ruined this country and it’s status as the worlds most powerful economy. It just hasn’t caught up to us quite yet. It nearly did in 2008, but the Federal Reserve reinflated the bubbles even bigger. All I know is that the 2020s are going to be a hell of a decade. The dollar is going to die because of all this spending beyond our means. Arm yourself, keep your head down and your family safe.
I doubt the US will just give it to them. Governmental forces will be occupied with keeping the integrity of the territory of the US, rather than tracking down on guerilla warfare civil wars locally held across the entire USA.
If a civil war breaks out in the US, it will be its end. Not even the law enforcement, combined with the military will be able to stop this, once it's steamrolling. It's just too big then. Many soldiers will desert from the military then. Because they all have family and friends fighting for their own survival while them being in the military. Not really motivation to stay in service if you ask me. And since the military is massively racemixed, this will potentially lead to ugly scenarios as well.
William Collins
18 million ars in circulation
John Morris
>what would a Second American Civil War look like? you know all those jews and free masons? imagine 2.4% of the population hanging from street lights.
Study the Spanish 'Civil War" add modern weapons and primitive tribes manipulated by Globalists, a dash of mussie et al
Robert Bell
>The American Dollars value plummets and becomes virtually worthless >The only currency accepted in the underground safe trading zones are ammunition and rare Combat Webms become a premium >The war devolves into dozens of different factions of soldiers all wearing Go-Pro's, all autistically trying to hit trick shots so to sell black market Webms so they can eat
Noah Sanchez
Can you even imagine what this would do to the meme economy?
Owen Long
I guess within the next 20 years a civil war will happen in the united states. To avoid it, the USA would need to completely change its money system and decluster its society, which i can't see happening.
After Trump, an era of libtard presidents will rule this country into its abyssmal end. Already now, white people are considered the cause of all problems, despite the facts. I see no peaceful solution to this as is.
Jason Sanchez
this is what a 2nd american revolution would look like
It wouldn't look like that though. Overall most people want to be left alone and live on a farm. City riots could hardly be called a civil war, it'd just be mobs of protesters that throw riots. Riots are just going to destroy the infrastructure and supply lines they need, so after a riot they're going to be begging for help because they can't get the supplies they want. So basically it'd look like a combination of hurricane relief, and Michigan in a spot nobody is going to want to open a store front. Michigan can't even get drinking water that isn't contaminated with lead. Riot destroys a grocery store, can't get food either. People are going to turn from rioting to begging to go to a FEMA camp. The economy is going to look like shit, and people just slowed down ever improving anything. Instead of even looking for work they'll be sitting around begging for help.
Christian Richardson
Texas will shit on Mexico better than rest of the states combined. Nobody claims Texas until the last standing Texan outside of Austin is still on his feet. You have clearly never been to Texas, 14 year old girls in Texas shoot better than pretty much any regular soldier in the rest of the planet.
Carson Garcia
Well i have lived in Texas and about 35% of the population of Texas is beaners. How in a civil war scenario will white texans be able to defend their soil, if the neigboring country Mexico will most likely use their entire military forces to reunite Texas with them? This could also make other spics entering Texas in hope to support the annexion of Texas. People usually see their best chances in flocking with likeminded people
Brayden Roberts
Really, really unpleasant on a level not many contemporary Americans can imagine.
Eli Stewart
You mean a full-on nation wide civil war or a small scale war between states, like a Texas vs Louisiana? Because the latter sounds more plausible than the former.
>What would the tactics look like? Like all the 21st century wars. Low scale urban warfare with tons of small groups.
Jacob Butler
You're half right. You have to win "hearts and minds" but really you're talking optics, right? So the heart of that isnt avoiding conflict, its causing it and blaming it on the "bad guys". Go ahead, take down power grids and water distribution. Blame the police, make agitprop that says they cut it off to fuck the rebs in the area, make it the enemies problem. Denial gets less convincing the more you have to do it.
Jayden Fisher
1930s spain and modern day USA look nothing alike t. Spaniard
Zachary Lopez
youre under the impression that all of those paramilitary fighters would be working in unison towards the same goal. Several might work together but all those militias might have conflicting ideas of what should happen and theyre be plenty of infighting. Hell, I bet you the same thing would happen to the actual military
Charles Brown
In all seriousness, there won't be a 2nd civil war. Incels are the only ones who want it and are too small, feeble, and despised to ever do anything
The US is too socially and economically intertwined for civil war to work and the US populace doesn't care enough about these things to commit to violence. It'd be 1000 fat SJWs vs 10 fat incels
a major european conflict was a constant worry before WW1 especially in the decade beforehand.
You're historically illiterate
Carter Johnson
it would be a race war that leads to Balkanization
Asher Price
>giving up territory >ever cuck
Christian Davis
Vietcong style insurgency everywhere. Groups like antifa would get a little more ballsy than normal but eventually somebody will start shooting at them. Cities would become no go zones and the suburbs would turn into enclaves depending on who wins. Rural areas would be the areas where stragglers would camp out until cletus ventilates them with his pump gates or durr rifle. The south west US would see a spic crusade against Americs and the nog enclaves would burn themselves to the ground. The midwest would be the safest bet
Sebastian Young
Jheri curl flamethrower wins every fight.
David Wilson
Burgerfats starve when mcdicks shuts down.
Alexander Foster
I dunno user, Hi Points and Kel Tecs can still put a hole in you.
Austin Morgan
>implying the gubbermin wouldn't be too busy fighting for survival to ban le forbidden pixels
Cameron Torres
Dhalsim lookin swole
Bentley Sullivan
>The battlefield becomes a place of entertainment Sign me the fuck up, I am ready to get no-scoped and teabagged.
Levi Turner
>second Europe Europe is Toast it will not have any food and it's cities will be burning B4 the US's. That leaves Russia or China and they might fight a war to see who gets FUSA
Aiden Thomas
>so we can all sing Dixieland the song is "Dixie", you user!
Kayden Martin
>the beaners will instantly claim "their" soil When was the last war a beaner won? The TX Nat Guard and the Confederate Air Force will turn them into refried beans
Aaron Garcia
pretty sure the entire military of Mexico is still no match for the Texas Military Forces, though how much of that would remain intact during a civil war is anyone's guess.
Jaxson Taylor
> (You)1930s spain and modern day USA look nothing alike Because your a haven for muzzies and commies
Anthony Richardson
>inb4 shitstorm Cities would be absolutely fucked
Jace Wright
Well I don't know about you guys, but I'm going up to the Appalachian mountains and seeing if I can't join up with some of my Pentecostal brothers and sisters in a militia.
On the subject of boogaloo I've been looking for a particular IRA song to add to my boogaloo playlist.
All I remember from it is that it's about an IRA soldier who is wounded in an ambush and is rescued by what later appears to be a ghostly apparition of an Irish Volunteer.
I remember one line
"Just drop those guns down gently a voice called in the dark"
Hudson Price
Second civil war alrdy started the moment whiteoids gave in to bipartisan party system became jewish farm tools as a nation
